BayshaO (2020) The impossible totality of Ukraine’s “people”: On the populist discourse of the Ukrainian Maidan. In:KranertM (ed.) Discursive Approaches to Populism Across Disciplines. Springer, pp.63–90.
2.
Charteris-BlackJ (2006) Britain as a container: Immigration metaphors in the 2005 election campaign. Discourse & Society17(5): 563–581.
3.
LaclauE (2005) On Populist Reason. Verso Books.
4.
LaclauE (2014) The Rhetorical Foundations of Society. Verso Books.
5.
PortoMD (2022) Water metaphors and evaluation of Syrian migration: The flow of refugees in the Spanish press. Metaphor and Symbol37(3): 252–267.
6.
ReisiglM (2018) Normative Standards for Critical Discourse Analysis – A Discourse-Historical Model. Keynote lecture presented at the 7th Conference On Critical Approaches To Discourse Analysis Across Disciplines, Aalberg, Denmark, 4–6 July.
7.
TaylorC (2020) Representing the Windrush generation: Metaphor in discourses then and now. Critical Discourse Studies17(1): 1–21.
8.
TaylorC (2022) The affordances of metaphor for diachronic corpora & discourse analysis: Water metaphors and migration. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics27(4): 451–479.
Törnquist-PlewaBYurchukY (2019) Memory politics in contemporary Ukraine: Reflections from the postcolonial perspective. Memory Studies12(6): 699–720.
11.
Van DijkTA (1998) Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Sage.
12.
Van DijkTA (2012) The role of the press in the reproduction of racism. In MesserMSchroederRWodakR (eds) Migrations: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Springer, pp.15–29.
13.
WodakR (2001) The Discourse-Historical Approach. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis1: 63–95.
14.
WodakR (2011) The Discourse of Politics in Action. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
15.
YekelchykS (2015) The Conflict in Ukraine. Oxford University Press.