Reconfiguration of socio-political identity is an everyday phenomenon, but it intensifies and becomes more pronounced during electoral periods. Through field observations and the qualitative analysis of slogans, speeches, and pamphlets, the paper focuses on discursive practices mobilising the Adivasi identity in Jharkhand. It considers three recent political events, elucidating how they attempt to conceptualise the question of Adivasi identity and delineate the inherent contrasting versions within the discourse. Based on the data collected during the fieldwork, the paper contradicts the notion that the Adivasi identity presents a monolithic picture in Jharkhand. It rather illustrates that the configuration and reconfiguration of identity is a multi-layered phenomenon, expressed through a multitude of narratives and discourses, exhibiting constant challenge and negotiation not only with the state but also within the community. It further argues that while the vocabulary of governing institutions shapes the discourses on Adivasis and their identity on one side, Adivasis actively seek to reshape the political language of the state on the other.
BaviskarA (2006) The politics of being indigenous. In: KarlssonBGSubbaTB (eds) Indigeneity in India. London: Kegan Paul Limited, pp. 33–50.
2.
BraunVClarkeV (2022) Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis. Qualitative Psychology9(1): 3–26.
3.
DamodaranVDasguptaS (2022) Special issue: Multiple worlds of the Adivasi: An introduction. Modern Asian Studies56(5): 1353–74.
4.
DevalleSBC (1989) Discourses of Ethnicity: The Adivasis of Jharkhand. Doctoral thesis, School of Oriental and African Studies: The University of London.
EkkaJN (2011) Christianity and tribal religion in Jharkhand (India): Proclamation, self-definition and transformation. In: BeheraNB (ed) Interfaith Relations after One Hundred Years: Christian Mission among Other Faiths. Oxford: Regnum Books International, pp. 142–62.
7.
ElwinV (1939) The Baiga. London: John Murray.
8.
FaircloughN (2000) New Labour, New Language. London and New York: Routledge.
9.
GaitEA (1913) Census of India, 1911, vol. I, part I. Calcutta: Superintendent Government Printing.
10.
GhuryeGS (1943) The Aborigines-“So-Called”-and Their Future. Pune: Gokhale Institute of Politics and Economics.
11.
Government of India (1996) The Provisions of the Panchayats (Extension to the Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996 (PESA). New Delhi: Ministry of Law and Justice. Available at: panchayat.gov.in/en/pesa-act/ (accessed 23 May 2024).
12.
HembramPC (2006) Return to the sacred grove. In SinghKS (ed) Tribal Movements in India, vol. II, pp. 87–91.
13.
HuttonJH (1933) Census of India, 1931, vol. I, part I. Calcutta: Superintendent Government Printing.
14.
KumarS (2023) Bringing ‘identity’ back in reviving nativism in contemporary Jharkhand. Economic and Political Weekly58(40): 18–20.
15.
LiT (2000) Articulating indigenous identity in Indonesia: Resource politics and the tribal slot. Comparative Studies in Society and History42(1): 149–179.
16.
MartenJT (1923) Census of India, 1921, vol. I, part II tables. Calcutta: Superintendent Government Printing.
17.
Ministry of Tribal Affairs (2011) State / UT wise overall population, ST population, percentage of STs in India / State to total population of India / State and percentage of STs in the State to total ST population. Available at: https://tribal.nic.in/ST/Statistics8518.pdf (accessed 1 March 2024).
18.
MishraAChandraV (2024) Mapping the Politics of Adivasiyat in Jharkhand. Economic and Political Weekly59(13): 57–64.
19.
MundaR (2000) Adi-Dharam: Religious Beliefs of the Adivasis of India. Bhubaneswar: sarini and BIRSA.
ShahA (2007) Keeping the state away: Democracy, Politics, and the State in India’s Jharkhand. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute13(2): 129–145.
TaylorC (1994) The politics of recognition. In: GutmannA (ed) Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, pp. 25-73.
