This paper is to analyse 180 speeches of the Iranian Supreme Leader (SL), Ayatollah Sayyid Ali Khamenei, from 2005 to 2013 which are concentrated upon characterising the threats of doshman [enemy] and depicting the future space of Iran. Adopting the Proximisation Theory, the investigation of the Iranian Supreme Leader’s speeches reveals that doshman poses futuristic spatial-axiological threats to the central values, programmes and policies of the Islamic Republic of Iran (IRI). Furthermore, the future space of Iran is figured in multifarious policies to preempt the construed spatial-axiological threats of doshman. In this regard, I indicated that the Supreme Leader resorts to the characterisation of the pre-revolutionary states of affairs (the past) to analogously characterise the opposite futures space of the IRI. Therefore, the SL programmes to mould the futures based on the present time values and programmes in order to abort the re-birth of the past. It was also indicated that the future space in this discourse serves to preempt the reification of the construed threats in the future.
AchugarM (2008) What We Remember: The Construction of Memory in Military Discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
2.
AchugarM (2009) Constructing the past and constructing themselves: The Uruguayan military’s memory of the dictatorship. Critical Discourse Studies6(4): 283–295.
3.
AdibzadeM (2008) Zaban, Gofteman va Siyasat-e Khareji: Diyalectic-e Baznamayi az Gharb da Jahan-e Nemadin-e Irani [Language, Discourse and Foreign Policy: The Dialectic Representation of the West in the Iranian Symbolic World]. Tehran: Akhtaran Publications.
4.
AlessandriniA (2003) Reading the future. Cultural Studies17(2): 211–229.
5.
BellW (2009 [1997]) Foundations of Future Studies: History, Purposes, and Knowledge, vol. 1. New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers.
6.
BinaOInchAPereiraL (2020) Beyond techno-utopia and its discontents: On the role of utopianism and speculative fiction in shaping alternatives to the smart city imaginary. Futures115(102475): 1–14.
7.
BrôneGFeyaertsK (2006) Headlines and cartoons in the Economic Press: Double grounding as a discourse supportive strategy. In: ErreygersGJacobsG (eds) Language, Communication and the Economy. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp.73–100.
8.
CapP (2006) Legitimization in Political Discourse: A Cross Disciplinary Perspective on the Modern US War Rhetoric. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press.
9.
CapP (2008) Towards the proximization model of the analysis of legitimization in political discourse. Journal of Pragmatics40(1): 17–41.
10.
CapP (2010) Axiological aspects of proximization. Journal of Pragmatics42(2): 392–407.
11.
CapP (2013) Proximization: The Pragmatics of Symbolic Distance Crossing. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
12.
CapP (2014) Expanding CDS methodology by cognitive-pragmatic tools: Proximization theory and public space discourses. In: HartCCapP (eds) Contemporary Critical Discourse Studies. London and New York: Bloomsbury, pp.189–210.
13.
CapP (2017) The Language of Fear: Communicating Threat in Public Discourse. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
14.
CapP (2018) Spatial Cognition. In: FlowerdewJRichardsonJ (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies. New York: Routledge, pp.92–105.
15.
ChiltonP (2004) Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.
16.
ChiltonP (2014) Language, Space and Mind: The Conceptual Geometry of Linguistic Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17.
CoffinC (2003) Re-construals of the past – Settlement or invasion? The role of Judgement Analysis. In: MartinJRWodakR (eds) Re/Reading the Past: Critical and Functional Perspective on Time and Value. Amesterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp.219–246.
18.
DuncanPT (2011) Commemorating Israel, Forgetting Palestine: Representation and Remembering in Dispensational Discourses. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS
19.
DuncanPT (2014) Remembering the future: Temporal tensions in the discursive construction and commemoration of Israel. Critical Discourse Studies11(4): 416–440.
20.
DunmirePL (2005) Preempting the future: Rhetoric and ideology of the future in political discourse. Discourse & Society16(4): 481–513.
21.
DunmirePL (2007) “Emerging Threats” and “Coming Dangers”. In: HodgesANilepC (eds) Discourse, War and Terrorism. Amesterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp.19–43.
22.
DunmirePL (2008) The Rhetoric of temporality: The future as linguistic construct and rhetorical resource. In: JohnstoneBEisenhartC (eds) Rhetoric in Detail. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp.81–111.
23.
DunmirePL (2011) Projecting the Future Through Political Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
24.
DunmirePL (2014) American ways of organizing the World: Designing the global future through US National Security Policy. In: HartCCapP (eds) Contemporary Critical Discourse Studies. London and New York: Bloomsbury, pp.321–345.
25.
DunmirePL (2015) Beyond space and time: Temporal and geographical configurations in us national security discourse. Critical Discourse Studies12(3): 297–312.
26.
EdelmanM (1964) The Symbolic Uses of Politics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
27.
EdelmanM (1971) Politics as Symbolic Action: Mass Arousal and Quiescence. Chicago: Markham.
28.
EdelmanM (1988) Constructing the Political Spectacle. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29.
ElmerGOpelA (2006) Surviving the inevitable future: Preemption in an age of faulty intelligence. Cultural Studies20(4-5): 477–492.
30.
Filardo-LlamasL (2015) Re-contextualizing political discourse: An analysis of shifting spaces in songs used as a political tool. Critical Discourse Studies12(3): 279–296.
31.
ForchtnerBKølvraaC (2012) Narrating a ‘New Europe’: From ‘Bitter Past’ to self-righteousness?Discourse & Society23(4): 377–400.
32.
HalbwachsM (1992) On Collective Memory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
33.
HartC (2015) Viewpoint in linguistic discourse: Space and evaluation in news reports of political protests. Critical Discourse Studies12(3): 238–260.
34.
HartleyPL (1953) The Go-Between. London: Hamish Hamilton Ltd.
35.
InayatullahS (1990) Deconstructing and reconstructing the future: Predictive, cultural and critical epistemologies. Futures22(2): 115–141.
36.
LanglotzA (2006) Occasional adnominal idiom modification – A cognitive linguistic approach. International Journal of English Studies 6(1): 85–108.
37.
MahonyNClarkeJ (2013) Public crises, public futures. Cultural Studies27(6): 933–954.
38.
MasiniEB (2002) A vision of futures studies. Futures34(3–4): 249–259.
39.
McAllumM (2017) Reconceiving the other: Possibilities beyond the seduction of popularist and authoritarian polarities. Journal of Future Studies21(3): 15–25.
40.
MuellerKPCastilloJJMorganFE, et al. (2006) Striking First: Preemptive and Preventive Attack in US National Security Policy. Santa Monika: Rand Corporation.
41.
MusolffA (2004) Metaphor and Political Discourse: Analogical Reasoning in Debates About Europe. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
42.
OrwellG (1987 [1949]) Nineteen Eighty-Four. New York and London: Everyman’s Library.
43.
PayneRA (2005) Deliberating preventive war: The strange case of Iraq’s disappearing nuclear threat. University Review35: 63–73.
44.
RichardsonJEWodakR (2009) Recontextualising fascist ideologies of the past: Right-Wing discourses on employment and nativism in Austria and the United Kingdom. Critical Discourse Studies6(4): 251–267.
45.
ScollonR (2001) Action and text: Towards an integrated understanding of the place of text in Social (Inter) action, mediated discourse analysis and the problem of social action. In: WodakRMeyerM (eds) Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: SAGE Publications, pp.113–139.
46.
WerthP (1999) Text Worlds: Representing Conceptual Space in Discourse. London: Longman.
