In this article I apply the notion of scaling as agentive discursive practice to analyze the construction of moral positionings by migrant women. I draw from semi-structured interviews with Uzbek women in the United States and use discourse analytic methods to focus on the relationship between linguistic choices and existing power structures. I show that although these women are caught between multiple moral orders, by linking behaviors associated with these orders to different time–space configurations and different scopes of generalizability, they are able to justify their choices and highlight the stability of their own morality. I further demonstrate that while these acts of scaling are agentive, they may also be used to reinforce rather than dismantle existing hierarchies, pointing to the need for further investigation of the relationship between agency, discourse and power in contemporary globalization.
AghaA (2007) Recombinant selves in mass mediated spacetime. Language & Communication27: 320–335.
2.
AtkinsonMHeritageJ (2006) Jefferson’s transcript notation. In: JaworskiACouplandN (eds) The Discourse Reader, 2nd edn. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 158–165.
3.
BaileyACanagarajahSLanSet al. (2016) Scalar politics, language ideologies, and the sociolinguistics of globalization among transnational Korean professionals in Hong Kong. Journal of Sociolinguistics20(3): 312–334.
4.
BakhtinM (1981) The Dialogic Imagination. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
5.
BaumanR (1992.) Contextualization, tradition, and the dialogue of genres: Icelandic legends of the Kraftaskald. In: DurantiAGoodwinC (eds) Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. New York; Oakleigh, VIC, Australia; Melbourne, VIC, Australia: Cambridge University Press, pp. 125–146.
6.
BhabhaH (1994.) The Location of Culture. London: Routledge.
BlommaertJ (2015) Chronotopes, scales, and complexity in the study of language in society. Annual Review of Anthropology44: 105–116.
9.
BlommaertJ (2017) Commentary: Mobility, contexts, and the chronotope. Language in Society46(1): 95–99.
10.
BlommaertJ (in press) Durkheim and the Internet: Sociolinguistics and the Sociological Imagination. London: Bloomsbury.
11.
CameronD (2005) Communication and commodification: Global economic change in sociolinguistic perspective. In: ErreygersGJacobsG (eds) Language, Communication and the Economy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 9–24.
12.
CanagarajahSDe CostaP (2016) Introduction: Scales analysis, and its uses and prospects in educational linguistics. Linguistics and Education34: 1–10.
13.
CatedralL (in press). Fate, forehead, and the neoliberal subject: Talk about success among Uzbek women in the United States. In: DjuraevaMTochonF (eds) Language Policy or the Politics of Language: Re-imagining the role of Language in a Neoliberal Society. Blue Mounds, WI: Deep University Press.
14.
DickH (2010) Imagined lives and modernist chronotopes in Mexican nonmigrant discourse. American Ethnologist37: 275–290.
15.
DickH (2017) Una Gabacha Sinvergüenza (A shameless white-trash woman): Moral mobility and interdiscursivity in a Mexican migrant community. American Anthropologist119(2): 223–235.
16.
FoucaultM (1991) Governmentality. In: BurchellGGordonCMillerP (eds) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 87–104.
17.
HallK (2014) Hypersubjectivity: Language, anxiety, and indexical dissonance in globalization. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication24(2): 261–273.
18.
HofmannEBuckleyC (2012) Cultural responses to changing gender patterns of migration in Georgia. International Migration50(5): 77–94.
19.
InoueM (2007) Language and gender in an age of neoliberalism. Gender and Language1(1): 79–91.
20.
IsabaevaE (2011) Leaving to enable others to remain: Remittances and new moral economies of migration in southern Kyrgyzstan. Central Asian Survey30(3–4): 541–554.
21.
KarimzadFCatedralL (2017) ‘No, we don’t mix languages’: Ideological power and the chronotopic organization of ethnolinguistic identities. Tilburg Papers in Culture Studies179: 1–36.
22.
KendziorS (2014) Reclaiming Ma’naviyat: Morality, criminality and dissent politics in Uzbekistan. In: ReevesMRasanayagamJBeyerJ (eds) Ethnographies of the State in Central Asia: Performing Politics. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, pp. 223–242.
23.
KovenM (2016) Essentialization strategies in the storytellings of young Luso-descendant women in France: Narrative calibration, voicing, and scale. Language & Communication46: 19–29.
24.
MooreA (2008) Rethinking scale as a geographical category: From analysis to practice. Progress in Human Geography32(2): 203–225.
25.
PillerI (2016) Linguistic Diversity and Social Justice: An Introduction to Applied Sociolinguistics. New York: Oxford University Press.
26.
RottenbergC (2014) The rise of neoliberal feminism. Cultural Studies28(3): 418–437.
27.
SilversteinM (1993) Metapragmatic discourse and metapragmatic function. In: LucyJ (ed.) Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 33–58.
28.
SmithMPGuarnizoLE (1998) Transnationalism from Below. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
29.
Van DijkTA (1998) Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
30.
Van DijkTA (2008) Discourse and Power. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
