This article provides an analysis and typology of the discursive strategies nationalist-populist anti-immigration parties use when responding to racism accusations in mainstream news. The typology is based on a three-party comparative analysis of statements given in national public service media by the representatives of three electorally successful Northwestern European populist parties – the UK Independence Party, the Finns Party and the Sweden Democrats. When responding to racism accusations, populist parties use both submissive and confrontational sets of discursive strategies in varying combinations to communicate an ambivalent attitude towards racism. This ambivalence is communicated both on the level of an individual speaker utilizing several strategies and on the level of multiple speakers communicating contradictory messages. The comparative analysis suggests that country-specific contexts, and the statuses of both the persons under accusation and the responders giving statements, affect to what extent responses to racism accusations tend to be confrontational.
AalbergTEsserFReinemannC. (eds) (2017) Populist Political Communication in Europe. New York: Routledge.
2.
AugoustinosMEveryD (2010) Accusations and denials of racism: Managing moral accountability in public discourse. Discourse & Society21(3): 251–256.
3.
BarkerM (1981) The New Racism: Conservatives and the Ideology of the Tribe. London: Junction Books.
4.
BenoitWL (1997) Image repair discourse and crisis communication. Public Relations Review23(2): 177–186.
5.
BenoitWL (2015) Accounts, Excuses, and Apologies: Image Repair Theory and Research. New York: SUNY Press.
6.
BorgS (2012) Perussuomalaiset [The Finns Party]. In: BorgS (ed.) Muutosvaalit 2011 [Elections of change 2011]. Helsinki: Ministry of Justice, pp. 191–210.
7.
British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) (2013a) UKIP: Amjad Bashir on Heseltine and media racist claims. Available at: www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-24384410 (accessed 25 August 2016).
8.
British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) (2013b) UKIP MEP ‘has regret’ over ‘Bongo Bongo’ phrase. Available at: www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-23608106 (accessed 25 August 2016).
British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) (2014c) Nigel Farage defends Romanian comments amid racism claims. Available at: www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-27474099 (accessed 25 August 2016).
12.
British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) (2014d) Nigel Farage: UKIP is not a racist party. Available at: www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-27315328 (accessed 25 August 2016).
13.
British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) (2014e) No further action against ‘ting tong’ UKIP MEP. Available at: www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-kent-29039503 (accessed 3 November 2016).
14.
British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) (2014f) UKIP criticism is ‘media witch-hunt’, Nathan Gill says. Available at: www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-politics-27471629 (accessed 25 August 2016).
15.
British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) (2014g) UKIP MEP Janice Atkinson uses ‘outrageous’ term for Thai woman. Available at: www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-kent-28840210 (accessed 3 November 2016).
16.
British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) (2014h) UKIP suspends ‘Islam is evil’ tweet candidate. Available at: www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-27268747 (accessed 25 August 2016).
17.
British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) (2015a) Bristol school apology after UKIP appears in far-right list. Available at: www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-bristol-31055349 (accessed 3 November 2016).
CoombsT (2012) Parameters for crisis communication. In: CoombsTHolladayS (eds) The Handbook of Crisis Communication. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 17–53.
20.
CoombsTHolladaySJ (eds) (2012) The Handbook of Crisis Communication. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
21.
CushionSThomasREllisO (2015) Interpreting UKIP’s ‘Earthquake’ in British politics: UK television news coverage of the 2009 and 2014 EU election campaigns. The Political Quarterly86(2): 314–322.
22.
EngelJWodakR (2013) ‘Calculated ambivalence’ and holocaust denial in Austria. In: WodakRRichardsonJE (eds) Analysing Fascist Discourse: European Fascism in Talk and Text. New York: Routledge, pp. 73–96.
23.
EveryDAugoustinosM (2007) Constructions of racism in the Australian parliamentary debates on asylum seekers. Discourse & Society18(4): 411–436.
24.
FeldmanMJacksonP (eds) (2014) Doublespeak: The Rhetoric of the Far Right Since 1945. Stuttgart: Ibidem Press.
25.
FordRGoodwinM (2014a) Understanding UKIP: Identity, social change and the left behind. The Political Quarterly58(3): 277–284.
26.
FordRGoodwinM (2014b) Revolt on the Right: Explaining Support for the Radical Right in Britain. London: Routledge.
27.
GoodmanSJohnsonAJ (2013) Strategies used by the far right to counter Accusations of racism. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis Across Disciplines6(2): 97–113.
28.
HallS (1982) The rediscovery of ideology: Return of the repressed in media studies. In: GurevitchMBennetTCurranJ (eds) Culture, Society and the Media. London: Methuen, pp. 52–86.
29.
HanssonS (2015) Discursive strategies of blame avoidance in government: A framework for analysis. Discourse & Society26(3): 297–322.
30.
HatakkaN (2016) When logics of party politics and online activism collide: The populist Finns Party’s identity under negotiation. New Media & Society. Epub ahead of print 10August2016. DOI: 10.1177/1461444816660728.
31.
HaytonR (2010) Research and analysis: Towards the Mainstream? UKIP and the 2009 elections to the European Parliament. Politics30(1): 26–35.
32.
HellströmANilssonT (2010) ‘We are the Good Guys’: Ideological positioning of the nationalist party Sverigedemokraterna in contemporary Swedish politics. Ethnicities10(1): 55–76.
33.
HellströmANilssonTStoltzP (2012) Nationalism vs. Nationalism: The Challenge of the Sweden Democrats in the Swedish public debate. Government and Opposition47(2): 186–205.
34.
HolstiO (1969) Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
35.
JohnsonAJGoodmanS (2013) Reversing racism and the elite conspiracy: Strategies used by the British National Party leader in response to hostile media appearances. Discourse, Context & Media2(3): 156–164.
36.
JudtT (2007) Postwar: A History of Europe since 1945. London: Pimlico.
37.
KIA-index (2015) Summering av 100 första webbplatserna [Summary of the 100 most popular web pages]. Available at: www.kiaindex.se/?page=1&;site_type=48 (accessed 25 August 2016).
38.
KuckartzU (2014) Qualitative Text Analysis: A Guide to Methods, Practice & Using Software. London: SAGE.
39.
MuddeC (2007) Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40.
NordensvardJKetolaM (2014) Nationalist reframing of the Finnish and Swedish welfare states – The nexus of nationalism and social policy in far-right populist parties. Social Policy & Administration49(3): 356–375.
41.
OskarsonMDemkerM (2015) Room for realignment: The working-class sympathy for Sweden Democrats. Government and Opposition50(4): 629–651.
42.
PernaaVRailoE (eds) (2012) Jytky: Eduskuntavaalien 2011 mediajulkisuus [Media and the 2011 Finnish Parliamentary elections]. Turku: Kirja-Aurora.
43.
ReyesA (2011) Strategies of legitimization in political discourse: From words to actions. Discourse & Society22(6): 781–807.
44.
RuostetsaariI (2011) Populistiset piirteet vennamolais-soinilaisen puolueen ohjelmissa [Populist features in the Finnish Rural Party’s and the Finns Party’s platforms]. In: WibergM (ed.) Populismi: Kriittinen arvio [Populism: A critical assessment]. Helsinki: Edita, pp. 94–146.
45.
RydgrenJRuthP (2013) Contextual explanations of radical right-wing support in Sweden: Socioeconomic marginalization, group threat, and the halo effect. Ethnic and Racial Studies36(4): 711–728.
46.
SannerstedtA (2014) Sverigedemokraternas sympatisörer [Sympathizers of the Sweden Democrats]. In: BergströmAOscarssonH (eds) Mittfåra & Marginal [Middle groove & marginal]. Göteborg: Göteborg University, pp. 445–458.
47.
StewartJMazzoleniGHorsfieldB (2003) Power to the media managers. In: MazzoleniGStewartJHorsfieldB (eds) The Media and Neo-Populism. London: Praeger, pp. 217–237.
48.
SullivanDLandauMBranscombeN. (2012) Competitive victimhood as a response to accusations of ingroup harm doing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology102(4): 778–795.
49.
Sveriges Television AB (SVT) (2012a) ‘De skulle försvara sig’ [‘It was self-defence’]. Available at: www.svt.se/agenda/jimmie-akesson-i-agenda (accessed 25 August 2016).
Sveriges Television AB (SVT) (2013) Åkesson vägrar svara om ‘aphelveten’-skandalen [Åkesson refuses to answer to the ‘damn monkeys’ scandal]. Available at: www.svt.se/nyheter/utrikes/akesson-om-aphelveten-skandalen (accessed 3 November 2016).
Sveriges Television AB (SVT) (2014b) Svarta rubriker för Jimmie Åkesson [Dark headlines for Jimmie Åkesson]. Available at: www.svt.se/kultur/sdmediebilden (accessed 25 August 2016).
ThompsonJ (1995) The Media and Modernity: A Social Theory of the Media. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
60.
Van DijkTA (1984) Prejudice in Discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
61.
Van DijkTA (1987) Communicating Racism: Ethnic Prejudice in Thought and Talk. London: SAGE.
62.
Van DijkTA (1992) Discourse and the denial of racism. Discourse & Society3(1): 87–118.
63.
Van DijkTA (1993) Elite Discourse and Racism. London: SAGE.
64.
Van DijkTA (1997) What is political discourse analysis? In: BlommaertJBulcaenC (eds) Political Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 11–52.
65.
Van DijkTA (2005) Politics, ideology, and discourse. In: WodakR (ed.) Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics: Volume on Politics and Language. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 728–740.
66.
Van DijkTA (2008) Discourse and Power. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
67.
VerkuytenM (2013) Justifying discrimination against Muslim immigrants: Out-group ideology and the five-step social identity model. British Journal of Social Psychology52(2): 345–360.
68.
VlastimilHPinkováA (2015) Populist Political Parties in East-Central Europe. Brno: Masarykova Univerzita.
69.
WalkerI (2001) The changing nature of racism: From old to new? In: AugoustinosMReynoldsK (eds) Understanding Prejudice, Racism, and Social Conflict. London: SAGE, pp. 24–42.
70.
WidfeldtA (2008) Party change as necessity – The case of the Sweden Democrats. Representation44(3): 265–276.
71.
WidfeldtA (2015) Extreme Right Parties in Scandinavia. New York: Routledge.
72.
WodakR (2003) Populist discourses: The rhetoric of exclusion in written genres. Document Design4(2): 132–148.
73.
WodakR (2013) ‘Anything goes!’: The Haiderization of Europe. In: WodakRKhosraviNikMMralB (eds) Right-Wing Populism in Europe: Politics and Discourse. London: Bloomsbury, pp. 23–37.
74.
WodakR (2015) The Politics of Fear: What Right-Wing Populist Discourses Mean. London: SAGE.
75.
WodakRKhosraviNikMMralB (eds) (2013) Right-Wing Populism in Europe: Politics and Discourse. London: Bloomsbury.
76.
Yleisradio (YLE) (2011a) Hakkarainen kiistää neekeripuheet [Hakkarainen denies ‘nigger’ statements]. Available at: www.yle.fi/uutiset/3-5364846 (accessed 3 November 2016).
Yleisradio (YLE) (2011c) Perussuomalaisten ryhmä antoi varoituksen Hakkaraiselle [The Finns Party parliamentary group put Hakkarainen on notice]. Available at: www.yle.fi/uutiset/3-5443519 (accessed 3 November 2016).
79.
Yleisradio (YLE) (2012a) Ehdokkaat väittelivät rasismista Ylen vaalitentissä [Candidates debated racism on YLE’s election debate]. Available at: www.yle.fi/uutiset/3-5052387 (accessed 3 November 2016).
80.
Yleisradio (YLE) (2012b) Soini: Köyliöläinen Rautio erotettaneen puolueesta [Soini: Local councillor Rautio presumably to be dismissed from party]. Available at: www.yle.fi/uutiset/3-5055811 (accessed 3 November 2016).
