This article aims to fill a gap in the existing research by analysing the construction of leadership and group identity in a corpus of 13 party conference speeches by the party leaders of the German Social Democratic Party (SPD) and the British Labour Party between 1997 and 2003. The comparative approach chosen will demonstrate the context sensitivity and strategic use of the pronominal self-references. The article will demonstrate how changes of pronominal self-reference in party conference speeches can be understood as strategic changes of footing to foreground either the voice of the party leader or the voice of the party. It will conclude with the results of an analysis of the combination of pronominal self-references and verb forms construing competence and responsiveness, as suggested by Fetzer and Bull, and demonstrates that these verb forms are used differently in combination with the various forms of self-reference, a fact neglected in their analysis.
AbromeitHStoiberM (2006) Demokratien im Vergleich: Einführung in die vergleichende Analyse politischer Systeme [Democracies in Comparison: Introduction into the comparative analysis of political systems]. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
2.
BastowSMartinJ (2003) Third Way Discourse: European Ideologies in the Twentieth Century. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
3.
BaumgartenN (2008) Writer construction in English and German popularized academic discourse: The uses of we and wir. Multilingua: Journal of Cross-Cultural and Interlanguage Communication27: 409–438.
4.
BlairT (1995a) Leader’s speech, Blackpool 1994. In: The Labour Party (ed.) Report of Conference: Annual Conference 1994, Special Conference Blackpool/London, 3–7 October 1994/29 April 1995. London: Labour Party, pp. 97–106.
5.
BlairT (1995b) Leader’s speech, Brighton 1995. In: The Labour Party (ed.) Conference Report: Ninety-fourth Annual Conference of the Labour Party Brighton, 2–6 October 1995. London: Labour Party, pp. 95–104.
6.
BlairT (1995c) Speech to the special conference 1995. In The Labour Party (ed.) Report of Conference: Annual Conference 1994, Special Conference 1995, Blackpool/London, 3–7 October 1994/29 April 1995. London: Labour Party, pp. 289–292.
7.
BlairT (1996) Leader’s speech, Blackpool 1996. In: The Labour Party (ed.) The Labour Party Conference Verbatim Report The Labour Party conference Verbatim report. Blackpool, 30 September-4 October 1996. London: Labour Party, pp. 80–87.
8.
BlairT (1997) Leader’s speech, Brighton 1997. In: The Labour Party (ed.) The Labour Party Conference Verbatim Report Brighton, 29 September-3 October 1997. London: Labour Party, pp. 68–73.
9.
BullPFetzerA (2006) Who are we and who are you? The strategic use of forms of address in political interviews. Text & Talk: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse & Communication Studies26: 3–37.
10.
CampbellKKJamiesonKH (2008) Presidents Creating the Presidency: Deeds Done in Words. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
11.
ChantrillPAMioJS (1996) Metonymy in political discourse. In: MioJSKatzAN (eds) Metaphor: Implications and Applications. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 171–184.
12.
ChiltonPSchäffnerC (1997) Discourse and politics. In: Van DijkTA (ed.) Discourse as Social Interaction. London: SAGE, pp. 206–230.
13.
ClarkeHDSandersDStewartMC. (2004) Political Choice in Britain. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
14.
DanielM (2005) Understanding inclusives. In: FilimonovaE (ed.) Clusivity: Typology and Case Studies of Inclusive-Exclusive Distinction. Amsterdam; Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 3–48.
15.
De FinaA (1995) Pronominal choice, identity, and solidarity in political discourse. Text: Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse15: 379–410.
16.
Faucher-KingF (2005) Changing Parties: An Anthropology of British Political Party Conferences. Basingstoke; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
17.
FetzerA (2014) ‘Judge us on what we do’: The strategic use of collective we in British political discourse. In: PavlidouT (ed.) Constructing Collectivity: ‘We’ across Languages and Contexts. Amsterdam; Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 331–350.
18.
FetzerABullP (2012) Doing leadership in political speech: Semantic processes and pragmatic inferences. Discourse & Society23: 127–144.
19.
GaffneyJ (1990) The Language of Political Leadership in Contemporary Britain. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
20.
GoffmanE (1981) Forms of Talk. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
21.
HelbigGBuschaJ (1991) Deutsche Grammatik: Ein Handbuch für den Ausländerunterricht [German Grammar: A Handbook for teaching German as a Foreign Language]. Leipzig: VEB Verlag Enzyklopädie; Langenscheidt.
22.
HelmbrechtJ (2002) Grammar and function of we. In: DuszakA (ed.) Us and Others: Social Identities across Languages, Discourses and Cultures. Amsterdam; Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 31–49.
23.
JunU (2004) Der Wandel von Parteien in der Mediendemokratie: SPD und Labour Party im Vergleich [The change of Parties in the media democracy: A Comparison of the German Social Democrats and the Labour Party]. Frankfurt am Main; New York: Campus-Verlag.
24.
KammererP (1995) Die veränderten Konstitutionsbedingungen politischer Rhetorik: Zur Rolle der Redenschreiber, der Medien und zum vermeintlichen Ende öffentlicher Rede [The changed conditions of political rhetoric: About the role of speech writers, the media and the alleged end of public oratory] . Rhetorik: ein internationales Jahrbuch14: 14–29.
25.
KleinJ (2000) Textsorten im Bereich politischer Institutionen [Genres in Political Institutions]. In: BrinkerKAntosGHeinemannW. (eds) Text- und Gesprächslinguistik: Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung [Linguistics of Text and Conversation: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research]. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 732–755.
26.
KleinJ (2007) Linguistische Hermeneutik politischer Rede.: Eine Modellanalyse am Beispiel von Kanzler Schröders Verkündung der Agenda 2010 [Linguistic hermeneutics of political speech: A model analysis of Schröders announcement of the ‘Agenda 2010’]. In: HermannsFHollyW (eds) Linguistische Hermeneutik: Theorie und Praxis des Verstehens und Interpretierens. Tübingen: Niemeyer, pp. 201–238.
27.
KranertM (2016) Text and context in the discourses of the third way in Germany and the UK: A comparative study of the language of ‘new labour’ and ‘Die Neue Mitte’. PhD Thesis, UCL, London.
28.
KühnP (1992) Adressaten und Adressatenkarussell in der öffentlich politischen Auseinandersetzung[The merry-go-round of addressees in political discourse.]. Rhetorik: ein internationales Jahrbuch11: 51–66.
LafontaineO (1997) Rede des Parteivorsitzenden. In Vorstand derSPD (ed.) Protokoll Parteitag Hannover. With assistance of Doris Schäfer, Gerd Ernst, Claudia Dahremöller, Peter Hinrichs. Parteitag: Hannover, 2–4. Dezember1997. SPD Parteivorstand, pp. 31–70.
31.
LafontaineO (1998a) Rede des Parteivorsitzenden. In Vorstand derSPD (ed.) Die Kraft des Neuen. Protokoll Wahlparteitag Leipzig 17, April 1998. Die Kraft des Neuen: Leipzig, 17. April1998, SPD Parteivorstand, pp. 71–81.
32.
LafontaineO (1998b) Rede des Parteivorsitzenden. In Vorstand derSPD (ed.) Innovation und Gerechtigkeit. Deutschland erneuern. Protokoll Parteitag Bonn 25. Oktober1998. With assistance of Doris Schäfer, Claudia Dahremöller, Peter Hinrichs. Innovation und Gerechtigkeit. Detuschland erneuern. Bonn, 25. Oktober1998. SPD Parteivorstand, pp. 17–35.
33.
MühlhäuslerPHarréR (1990) Pronouns and People: The Linguistic Construction of Social and Personal Identity. Oxford; Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
34.
NachtweyO (2009) Marktsozialdemokratie: Die Transformation von SPD und Labour Party [Market social democracy: The Transformations of the German social democracy and the Labour Party]. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
35.
PeeleG (2004) Governing the UK: British Politics in the 21st Century. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
36.
PoguntkeT (2005) A presidentializing party state? The Federal Republic of Germany. In: PoguntkeTWebbP (eds) The Presidentialization of Politics: A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 63–87.
37.
PoguntkeTWebbP (2005) The presidentialization of politics in democratic societies: A framework for analysis. In: PoguntkeTWebbP (eds) The Presidentialization of Politics: A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–25.
38.
PrechtRD (2011) Who Am I? – And if so, How Many? A Philosophical Journey. New York: Spiegel & Grau.
39.
PyykköR (2002) Who is ‘us’ in Russian political discourse. In: DuszakA (ed.) Us and Others: Social Identities across Languages, Discourses and Cultures. Amsterdam; Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 233–248.
40.
QuirkRGreenbaumSLeechGN. (1985) A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
41.
ReisiglM (2008) Rhetoric of political speeches. In: WodakRKollerV (eds) Handbook of Communication in the Public Sphere. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 243–270.
42.
RudzioW (2003) Das politische System der Bundesrepublik Deutschland [The Political System of Germany]. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
43.
SchröderGerhard (1997): Innovationen für Deutschland. In Vorstand derSPD (ed.) Protokoll Parteitag Hannover. With assistance of Doris Schäfer, Gerd Ernst, Claudia Dahremöller, Peter Hinrichs. Parteitag: Hannover, 2–4, Dezember1997, SPD Parteivorstand, pp. 719–737.
44.
SchröderG (1998a) Die Kraft des Neuen: Rede auf dem Wahlparteitag der SPD in Leipzig [The power of the new: Speech at the election party conference of the SPD in Leipzig], 17. April1998. In: Die Kraft des Neuen: Protokoll Wahlparteitag [The Power of the new. Verbatim report of the election party conference. Vorstand der SPD, Leipzig, 17April, pp. 19–54.
45.
SchröderG (1998b) Rede Gerhard Schröder [Speech of Gerhard Schröder]. In: Innovation und Gerechtigkeit. Deutschland erneuern: Protokoll Parteitag [Innovation and Justice. Renewing Germany. Verbatim Report of the Party conference] Vorstand der SPD, Bonn, 25October, pp. 36–47.
46.
SchröderG (2003a) Rede des Parteivorsitzenden Gerhard Schröder [Speech of the Party Chairman Gerhard Schröder]. In: Vorstand DerSPD (ed.) Außerordentlicher Bundesparteitag: Agenda 2010, Berlin: SPD Parteivorstand pp. 13–27.
47.
SchröderGerhard (2003): Rede des Parteivorsitzenden. Das Wichtige tun [Speech of the Party Chairman. To do the Important]. In ParteivorstandSPD (Ed.), Das Wichtige Tun. Bundesparteitag Bochum 2003. With assistance of Claudia Dahremöller. Das Wichtige Tun: Bochum, 17November2003/19November2003, Berlin: SPD Parteivorstand, pp. 47–68.
48.
SkarżyńskaK (2002) WE and THEY in Polish political discourse: A psychological approach. In: DuszakA (ed.) Us and Others: Social Identities across Languages, Discourses and Cultures. Amsterdam; Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 249–264.
49.
St. ClairR (1973) Inclusive and exclusive pronouns in English. Journal of English Linguistics7: 43–49.
50.
StewartMCClarkeHD (1992) The (un)importance of party leaders: Leader images and party choice in the 1987 British election. The Journal of Politics54: 447–470.
51.
TurowskiJ (2010) Sozialdemokratische Reformdiskurse [Social democratic reform discourses]. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
52.
WalesK (1996) Personal Pronouns in Present-day English. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
53.
WilsonJ (1990) Politically Speaking: The Pragmatic Analysis of Political Language. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
54.
WorthamSEF (1996) Mapping participant deictics: A technique for discovering speakers’ footing. Journal of Pragmatics25: 331–348.
55.
ZifonunG (2001) Grammatik des Deutschen im Europäischen Vergleich. Das Pronomen [Grammar of German in Comparison. The Pronoun]. Mannheim: Inst. für Dt. Sprache.
