This article presents findings from a critical historical analysis of UK education policy discourse from 1972 onwards. It argues that the pronoun we was introduced as an important rhetorical tool by which New Labour was able to legitimate its policy decisions through the idea of a neoliberal ‘consensus’ on the context of education, while at the same time articulating a ‘politics of inclusion’. The study combined a corpus-aided approach to critical discourse analysis with political economic theory in order to interpret the data in relation to its historical context of a profound rethink of the relationship between education, the state and the economy. The analysis reveals how the flexible semantics of person deixis are exploited in a highly systematic way so as to claim consensus over politically contestable claims.
AinleyP (2000) From Earning to Learning: What is Happening to Education and the Welfare State?London: Tufnell Press.
2.
BrownPLauderH (2006) Globalisation, knowledge and the myth of the magnet economy. Globalisation, Societies and Education4(1): 25–57.
3.
BühlerK (1934/1982) Sprachtheorie: Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache (Theory of Language: the Representational Function of Language). Stuttgart and New York: Fischer.
4.
ChiltonP (2004) Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.
5.
CramerJ (2010) Do we really want to be like them? Indexing Europeanness through pronominal use. Discourse & Society21(6): 619–637.
6.
DaleR (1989) The State and Education Policy. Buckingham: Open University Press.
7.
DaleRRobertsonS (2006) The case of the UK: Homo sapiens Europaeus vs. homo quaestuosus Atlanticus? European learning citizen or Anglo-American human capitalist? In: KuhnMSultanaR (eds) Creating the European Learning Citizen. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 21–46.
8.
DeanM (1999) Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society. London: SAGE.
9.
Department for Education and Skills (DfES) (2003) 21st Century Skills: Realising our Potential. White Paper Cm 5810. London: HMSO.
10.
EagletonT (1991) Ideology: An Introduction. London: Verso.
11.
FaircloughN (1989) Language and Power. London: Longman.
12.
FaircloughN (1992) Discourse and Social Change. Oxford: Blackwell.
13.
FaircloughN (2000) New Labour, New Language? London: Routledge.
14.
FaircloughN (2003) Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.
15.
FaircloughN (2006) Language and Globalisation. London: Routledge.
16.
FaircloughIFaircloughN (2012) Political Discourse Analysis: A Method for Advanced Students. London: Routledge.
17.
FaircloughNWodakR (2008) The Bologna process and the knowledge-based economy: A critical discourse analysis approach. In: JessopBFaircloughNWodakR (eds) Education and the Knowledge-based Economy in Europe. Amsterdam: Sense Publishers, pp. 109–125.
18.
FaircloughNMulderrigJWodakR (2011) Critical discourse analysis. In: Van DijkT (ed.) Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. London: SAGE, pp. 357–378.
19.
FarrellyM (2010) Critical discourse analysis in political studies: An illustrative analysis of the ‘empowerment’ agenda. Politics30(2): 98–104.
20.
FillmoreC (1997) Lectures on Deixis. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
21.
FowlerR (1991) Language in the News: Discourse and Ideology in the Press. London: Routledge.
22.
GiddensA (1998) The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy. Cambridge: Polity.
23.
GrahamP (2002) Predication and propagation: A method for analyzing evaluative meanings in technology policy. Text – Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse22(2): 227–268.
HallidayM (1978) Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
26.
HallidayMMatthiessenM (2004) An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 3rd edn.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27.
HarveyD (2005) A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28.
HayC (1996) Re-stating Social and Political Change. Buckingham: Open University Press.
29.
HayC (1999) The Political Economy of New Labour: Labouring Under False Pretences?Manchester: Manchester University Press.
30.
JessopB (1994) The transition to post-Fordism and the Schumpeterian workfare state. In: BurrowsRLoaderB (eds) Towards a Post-Fordist Welfare State?London: Routledge, pp. 30–54.
31.
JessopB (2002) The Future of the Capitalist State. Cambridge: Polity.
32.
JessopB (2006) From Thatcherism to New Labour: Neo-Liberalism, Workfarism, and Labour Market Regulation. Department of Sociology, Lancaster University. Available at: http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/sociology/soc131rj.pdf (accessed 5 September 2012).
33.
KollerVDavidsonP (2008) Social exclusion as conceptual and grammatical metaphor: A cross-genre study of British policy-making. Discourse & Society19(3): 307–332.
34.
LemkeJ (1998) Resources for attitudinal meaning: Evaluative orientations in text semantics. Functions of Language5: 33–56.
35.
LevinsonS (1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36.
LevitasR (1999) The concept of social exclusion and the new Durkheimian hegemony. Critical Social Policy16(1): 5–20.
37.
LevitasR (2004) Let’s hear it for Humpty: Social exclusion, the third way and cultural capital. Cultural Trends13(2): 41–56.
38.
MautnerG (2005) Time to get wired: Using web-based corpora in critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society16(6): 809–828.
39.
MolesworthMScullionRNixonL (eds) (2010) The Marketisation of Higher Education and the Student as Consumer. London: Routledge.
40.
MulderrigJ (2003) Consuming education: A critical discourse analysis of social actors in New Labour’s education policy. The Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies1(1). Available at: http://www.jceps.com
41.
MulderrigJ (2008) Using keywords analysis in CDA: Evolving discourses of the knowledge economy in education. In: JessopBFaircloughNWodakR (eds) Education and the Knowledge-based Economy in Europe. Amsterdam: Sense Publishers, pp. 149–170.
42.
MulderrigJ (2009) The Language of Education Policy: From Thatcher to Blair. Saarbrucken: Verlag Dr Muller.
43.
MulderrigJ (2011a) Manufacturing consent: A corpus-based critical discourse analysis of New Labour’s educational governance. Journal of Educational Philosophy and Theory43(6): 562–578.
44.
MulderrigJ (2011b) The grammar of governance. Critical Discourse Studies8(1): 45–68.
45.
O’KeefeAClancyBAdolphsS (2011) Introducing Pragmatics in Use. London: Routledge.
46.
PearceM (2001) Getting behind the image: Personality politics in a Labour party election broadcast. Language and Literature10(3): 211–228.
47.
PearceM (2005) Informalization in UK party election broadcasts 1966–97. Language and Literature14(1): 65–90.
48.
PeckJ (2001) Neoliberalizing states: Thin policies/hard outcomes. Progress in Human Geography25: 445–455.
49.
PennycookA (1994) The politics of pronouns. ELT Journal48(2): 173–178.
50.
PetersooP (2007) What does ‘we’ mean? National deixis in the media. Journal of Language and Politics6(3): 419–436.
51.
PutnamR (1995) Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy6(1): 65–78.
52.
ReisiglMWodakR (2001) Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London: Routledge.
53.
RobertsonS (2002) Changing governance/changing equality? Understanding the politics of public–private partnerships in education in Europe, European Science Foundation. In: Exploratory Workshop, Globalization: Education Restructuring and Social Cohesion in Europe, Barcelona, 3–5October.
54.
RoseN (1999a) Inventiveness in politics. Economy and Society28(3): 467–493.
55.
RoseN (1999b) Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56.
ScottM (1997) Wordsmith Tools, Version 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
57.
SilversteinM (2003) Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language and Communication: Comparative Perspectives23: 193–229.
Van DijkT (1991) Racism and the Press. London: Routledge.
60.
Van DijkT (2002) Ideology: Political discourse and cognition. In: ChiltonPSchaffnerC (eds) Politics as Text and Talk: Analytical Approaches to Political Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 203–238.
61.
Van DijkT (2008) Discourse and Context: A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
62.
WilsonJ (1990) Politically Speaking: The Pragmatic Analysis of Political Language. Oxford: Blackwell.
63.
WodakRKollerV (eds) (2008) Handbook of Communication in the Public Sphere. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
64.
WodakRMeyerM (eds) (2009) Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: SAGE.
