This article explores the rhetorical accomplishment by British book group members of anti-racist identities through their discussions of fictional texts in exploring themes of race and immigration. ‘Common-sense anti-racism’ is a social action or stance that is presented as self-evidently taken by speakers, yet explicitly flagged at the same time. Speakers in book group discussions routinely display enlightened, anti-racist views, principally by invoking the figure of the ‘racist other’ and their reported speech. Many of the examples of reported speech do not involve explicit markers of quotation or shifts in footing, meaning that the attribution of certain utterances to a racist ‘other’ relies on an assumption of shared values.
The article questions why anti-racism tends to be packaged as an accountable matter in need of some impression management in the way that racism often is, and concludes that this is linked to the way in which it operates in contexts where anxieties around issues of race and racism continue to exist.
BarkerM (1981) The New Racism: Conservatives and the Ideology of the Tribe. London: Junction Books.
2.
BarnesBPalmaryIDurrheimK (2001) The denial of racism: The role of humor, personal experience, and self-censorship. Journal of Language and Social Psychology20: 321–338.
3.
BenwellBProcterJRobinsonG (2012) That may be where I come from, but that’s not how I read: Diaspora, location and reading identities. In: BenwellBProcterJRobinsonG (eds) Postcolonial Audiences: Readers, Viewers and Reception. London: Routledge, pp. 43–56.
4.
BilligM (1996) Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology (rev. edn). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5.
BilligM (2001) Humour and hatred: The racist jokes of the Ku Klux Klan. Discourse & Society12(3): 267–289.
Bonilla-SilvaEFormanT (2000) ‘I am not a racist but …’: Mapping white college students’ racist ideology in the USA. Discourse & Society11(1): 50–85.
8.
ButtnyR (1997) Reported speech in talking race on campus. Human Communication Research23(4): 477–506.
9.
ButtnyR (2003) Multiple voices in talking race: Pakeha reported speech in the discursive construction of the racial other. In: Van Den BergHWetherellMHoutkoop-SteenstraH (eds) Analyzing Race Talk: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on the Research Interview. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 103–118.
10.
ButtnyRWilliamsPL (2000) Demanding respect: The uses of reported speech in discursive constructions of interracial contact. Discourse & Society11(1): 109–133.
11.
ClarkHHGerrigR (1984) On the pretense theory of irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General113(1): 121–126.
12.
ClarkHHGerrigRJ (1990) Quotations as demonstrations. Language66(4): 764–805.
13.
CondorS (2006) Public prejudice as collaborative accomplishment: Towards a dialogic social psychology of racism. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology16(1): 1–18.
14.
EdwardsD (1994) Script formulations: A study of event descriptions in conversation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology13(3): 211–247.
15.
EdwardsD (1997) Discourse and Cognition. London: SAGE.
16.
EdwardsD (2003) Analysing racial discourse: The discursive psychology of Mind–World relationships. In: Van den BergHWetherellMHoutkoop-SteenstraH (eds) Analyzing Race Talk: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on the Research Interview. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 31–48.
17.
FozdarF (2008) Duelling discourses, shared weapons: Rhetorical techniques used to challenge racist arguments. Discourse & Society19(4): 529–547.
18.
GarfinkelH (1956) Some sociological concepts and methods for psychiatrists. Psychiatric Research Reports6: 181–198.
19.
GarfinkelH (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
20.
GilroyP (1987) Two sides of anti-racism. In: GilroyP (ed.) There ain’t No Black in the Union Jack: The Cultural Politics of Race and Nation. London: Hutchinson, pp. 114–152.
21.
GoffmanE (1974) Frame Analysis. New York: Harper and Row.
22.
GunnD (2004) Free indirect discourse and narrative authority in Emma. Narrative12(1): 35–54.
23.
HoltE (1996) Reporting on talk: The use of direct reported speech in conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction29(3): 219–245.
24.
HoltE (2000) Reporting and reacting: Concurrent responses to reported speech. Research on Language and Social Interaction33(4): 425–454.
25.
JeffersonG (1990) List-construction as a task and a resource. In: PsathasG (ed.) Interaction Competence. Washington, DC: University Press of America, pp. 63–92.
26.
LeechGShortM (1981) Style in Fiction. London: Longman.
27.
LongE (2003) Book Clubs: Women and the Uses of Reading in Everyday Life. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
28.
McHoulAWatsonDR (1984) Two axes for the analysis of ‘commonsense’ and ‘formal’ geographical knowledge in classroom talk. British Journal of the Sociology of Education5: 281–302.
29.
MitchellMEveryDRanzijnR (2011) Everyday antiracism in interpersonal contexts: Constraining and facilitating factors for ‘speaking up’ against racism. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology21(4): 329–341.
30.
Mitchell-KernanC (1972) Signifying and marking: Two Afro-American speech acts. In: GumperzJHymesD (eds) Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 161–179.
31.
MyersG (1999) Functions of reported speech in group discussions. Applied Linguistics20(3): 376–401.
32.
New Shorter Oxford English Dictionary (OED) (1993) Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33.
OED online (2011) Available at: http://www.oed.com/ (accessed 6 September 2011).
34.
PollnerM (1987) Mundane Reason: Reality in Everyday Life and Sociological Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35.
PomerantzA (1986) Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims. Human Studies9(2–3): 219–229.
36.
RapleyM (1998) ‘Just an ordinary Australian’: Self-categorisation and the discursive construction of facticity in ‘new racist’ political rhetoric. British Journal of Social Psychology37(3): 325–344.
37.
SacksH (1992) Lectures on Conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.
38.
SchiffrinD (1987) Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39.
ShoapsR (2010) ‘Moral irony’: Modal particles, moral persons and indirect stance-taking in Sakapultek discourse. Pragmatics17(2): 297–335.
40.
SperberDWilsonD (1981) Irony and the use–mention distinction. In: ColeP (ed.) Radical Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, pp. 295–318.
41.
StokoeE (2010) Gender, conversation analysis, and the anatomy of membership categorization practices. Social and Personality Psychology Compass4(7): 428–438.
42.
StokoeE (2012) ‘You know how men are’: Description, categorization and the anatomy of a categorial practice. Gender and Language6(1): 231–253.
43.
StokoeEEdwardsD (2007) ‘Black this, black that’: Racial insults and reported speech in neighbour complaints and police interrogations. Discourse & Society18(3): 337–372.
44.
Van Den BergHWetherellMHoutkoop-SteenstraH (eds) (2003) Analyzing Race Talk: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on the Research Interview. New York: Cambridge University Press.
45.
Van DijkTA (1987) Communicating Racism: Ethnic Prejudice in Thought and Talk. London: SAGE.
46.
Van DijkTA (1991) Racism and the Press. London: Routledge.
47.
Van DijkTA (1992) Discourse and the denial of racism. Discourse & Society3(1): 87–118.
48.
VerkuytenMDe JongWMassonK (2002) Similarities in anti-racist and racist discourse: Dutch local residents talking about ethnic minorities. In: GiltrowJ (ed.) Academic Reading: Reading and Writing in the Disciplines. Peterborough: Broadview Press, pp. 434–452.
49.
WetherellMPotterJ (1992) Mapping the Language of Racism: Discourse and the Legitimation of Exploitation. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
50.
WhiteheadK (2009) ‘Categorizing the categorizer’: The management of racial common sense in interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly72(4): 325–342.
51.
YuleGMathisTHopkinsM (1992) On reporting what was said. ELT Journal46(3): 245–251.
