We examine the way group membership and its relation with ethnicity is interactionally constructed in an interview between an interviewer who presents himself as favorable towards black music and black people and an interviewee who is a former slave. The interview, which took place in the 1940s Deep South in a context in which racial inequality was still institutionally embedded, focused both on the interviewee’s memories of slave life and on current life and opinions about music. The discussion of each period is characterized by a different genre: while extended turns and lengthy stories occur while discussing the antebellum period, the discussion of the postbellum period is characterized by short and heavily negotiated question and answer sequences. However, throughout the entire interview, the interviewee maintains coherence by frequently shifting alignments and basing group memberships on quite diverse criteria, as such challenging its relation with ethnicity as initiated by the interviewer.
AtkinsonPDelamontS (2006) Rescuing narrative from qualitative research. Narrative Inquiry16(1): 164–172.
3.
BaileyDT (1980) A divided prism: Two sources of black testimony on slavery. The Journal of Southern History46(3): 381–404.
4.
BaynhamM (2006) Performing self, narrative and community in Moroccan narratives of migration and settlement. In: De FinaASchiffrinDBambergM (eds) Discourse and Identity: Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 23. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 376–397.
5.
BlassingameJW (1972) The Slave Community: Plantation Life in the Antebellum South. New York: Oxford University Press.
6.
BlassingameJW (1975) Using the testimony of ex-slaves: Approaches and problems. The Journal of Southern History41(4): 473–492.
7.
BrownSA (1991) On dialect usage. In: DavisCTGatesHLJ (eds) The Slave’s Narrative. New York: Oxford University Press, 37–39.
8.
ButtnyR (2001) Therapeutic humor in retelling the clients’ tellings. Text21(3): 303–327.
9.
CarranzaIE (1998) Low-narrativity narratives and argumentation. Narrative Inquiry8(2): 287–317.
10.
CohenRD (ed.) (2011) Alan Lomax, Assistant in Charge of the Library of Congress: Letters 1935–1945. Jackson, MI: University Press of Mississippi.
11.
De FinaA (2009) Narratives in interview – the case of accounts: For an interactional approach to narrative genres. Narrative Inquiry19(2): 233–258.
12.
De FinaA (2011) Researcher and informant roles in narrative interactions: Constructions of belonging and foreign-ness. Language in Society40: 27–38.
EscottPD (1991) The art and science of reading WPA slave narratives. In: DavisCTGatesHLJ (eds) The Slave’s Narrative. New York: Oxford University Press, 40–47.
15.
GeorgakopoulouA (2007) Small Stories, Interaction and Identities. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
16.
GlennP (2003) Laughter in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17.
HamiltonM (2001) The blues, the folk, and African-American history. Transactions of the Royal Historical Society11: 17–35.
18.
HesterS (1996) Laughter in its place. In: PatonGECPowellCWaggS (eds) The Social Faces of Humour: Practices and Issues. Aldershot: Arena, 243–270.
19.
HesterSEglinP (1997a) Membership categorization analysis: An introduction. In: HesterSEglinP (eds) Culture in Action: Studies in Membership Categorization Analysis. Washington, DC: University Press of America, 1–24.
20.
HesterSEglinP (1997b) Conclusion: Membership categorization analysis and sociology. In: HesterSEglinP (eds) Culture in Action: Studies in Membership Categorization Analysis. Washington, DC: University Press of America, 153–164.
HousleyWFitzgeraldR (2002) The reconsidered model of membership categorization analysis. Qualitative Research2: 59–83.
23.
JayyusiL (1984) Categorization and the Moral Order. Boston, MA: Routledge.
24.
JeffersonG (1979) A technique for inviting laughter and its subsequent acceptance/declination. In: PsathasG (ed.) Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington, 79–96.
25.
KoshikI (2005) Beyond Rhetorical Questions: Assertive Questions in Everyday Interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
26.
LabovW (1982) Speech actions and reactions in personal narrative. In: TannenD (ed.) Analyzing Discourse: Text and Talk. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 219–247.
27.
LepperG (2000) Categories in Text and Talk: A Practical Introduction to Categorization Analysis. London: SAGE.
28.
LeudarIMarslandVNekvapilJ (2004) On membership categorization: ‘us’, ‘them’ and ‘doing violence’ in political discourse. Discourse & Society15(2–3): 243–266.
29.
Library of Congress (2011) The Library of Congress/Fisk University Mississippi Delta Collection. Available at: http://www.loc.gov/folklife/guides/fisk.html (accessed 17 May 2011).
30.
LindeC (1993) Life Stories: The Creation of Coherence. New York: Oxford University Press.
31.
LomaxA (1993) The Land Where the Blues Began. New York: Pantheon Books.
32.
LynchMBogenD (2005) ‘My memory has been shredded’: A non-cognitivist investigation of ‘mental’ phenomena. In: Te MolderHPotterJ (eds) Conversation and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 226–240.
33.
McAdamsDP (2006) The role of narrative in personality psychology today. Narrative Inquiry16(1): 11–18.
34.
Moita-LopesLP (2006) On being white, heterosexual and male in a Brazilian school: Multiple positionings in oral narratives. In: De FinaASchiffrinDBambergM (eds) Discourse and Identity: Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 23. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 288–313.
35.
NorrickNR (2005) The dark side of tellability. Narrative Inquiry15(2): 323–343.
36.
PomerantzA (1984) Giving a source or basis: The practice in conversation of telling ‘how I know’. Journal of Pragmatics8: 607–625.
37.
PomerantzA (1986) Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims. Human Studies9: 219–229.
38.
PotterJWetherellM (1987) Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour. London: SAGE.
39.
PuckettNN (1990) Names of the American Negro slaves. In: DundesA (ed.) Mother Wit from the Laughing Barrel: Readings in the Interpretation of Afro-American Folklore. Jackson, MI and London: University Press of Mississippi, 156–174.
40.
SacksH (1972) An initial investigation of the usability of conversational data for doing sociology. In: SudnowD (ed.) Studies in Social Interaction. New York: Free Press, 31–74.
41.
SacksH (1986) On the analyzability of stories by children. In: GumperzJJHymesD (eds) Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 325–345.
42.
SacksH (1992) Lectures on Conversation, 2 vols (ed. JeffersonG with Introductions by SchegloffEA). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
43.
SchaefferNCMaynardDW (2005) From paradigm to prototype and back again: Interactive aspects of ‘cognitive processing’ in standardized survey interviews. In: Te MolderHPotterJ (eds) Conversation and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 114–133.
44.
SchegloffE (2007) A tutorial on membership categorization. Journal of Pragmatics39: 462–482.
45.
SchiffrinD (1993) ‘Speaking for another’ in sociolinguistic interviews: Alignments, identities, and frames. In: TannenD (ed.) Framing in Discourse. New York: Oxford University Press, 231–263.
46.
SekoraJ (1987) Black message/white envelope: Genre, authenticity, and authority in the antebellum slave narratives. Callaloo32(3): 482–515.
47.
SoapesT (1977) The Federal Writers’ Project slave interviews: Useful data or misleading source. The Oral History Review5(1): 33–38.
48.
SpindelDJ (1996) Assessing memory: 20th century slave narratives reconsidered. Journal of Interdisciplinary History27(2): 247–261.
49.
StiversT (2007) Alternative recognitionals in person reference. In: EnfieldNStiversT (eds) Person Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural and Social Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 73–96.
50.
TannenD (1989) Talking Voices, Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
51.
Van De MieroopDCliftonJ (2011) Standardized relational pairs in interviews with former slaves: Construction, negotation and alignment. Narrative Inquiry21(1): 44–67.
52.
Van DijkTA (2008) Discourse and Context: A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53.
Van DijkTA (2009) Society and Discourse: How Social Contexts Influence Text and Talk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
54.
Vann WoodwardC (1991) History from slave sources. In: DavisCTGatesHLJ (eds) The Slave’s Narrative. New York: Oxford University Press, 48–59.
55.
WetherellMMaybinJ (1996) The distributed self: A social constructionist perspective. In: StevensR (ed.) Understanding the Self. London: SAGE, 219–279.
56.
WetherellMPotterJ (1992) Mapping the Language of Racism, Discourse and the Legitimation of Exploitation. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
57.
WhooleyO (2006) The political work of narratives: A dialogic analysis of two slave narratives. Narrative Inquiry16(2): 295–318.
58.
YetmanNR (1967) The background of the slave narrative collection. American Quarterly19(3): 534–553.
59.
YetmanNR (1984) Ex-slave interviews and the historiography of slavery. American Quarterly36(2): 181–210.
60.
ZimmermanDH (1988) On conversation: The conversation analytic perspective. In: Communication Yearbook 11 (published annually for the International Communication Association). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE, 406–432.
61.
ZimmermanDH (1998) Identity, context and interaction. In: AntakiCWiddicombeS (eds) Identities in Talk. London: SAGE, 87–106.
