Drawing on discursive psychology, critical discourse analysis and conversation analysis, this study examines the discursive procedures in which accusations and refutations are made in public discourse on hate speech against immigrants in the United States. The data under study are two extended interviews on CNN regarding illegal immigration. The matter of analytic interest in this article is the verbal formulations of rhetorical devices and their interactive uses in accusing and denying racial hatred. A close analysis of the argumentation in each debate reveals that the use of a rhetorical device may be interactively called for and contextually sensitive in relation to an interactional goal, and its local and global function may be inferred from the sequential procedures wherein participants make an effort at a particular juncture to constrain the course of interaction in an attempt to execute their respective agenda. It is argued here that the performance and the structure of a public discourse on race or ethnicity may be explained in reference to the US societal and cultural orientations to individuals’ positive and negative face wants.
Augoustinos, M. and Every, D. ( 2007) ‘The Language of Race and Prejudice: A Discourse of Denial, Reason, and Liberal-practical Politics’, Journal of Language and Social Psychology26(2): 123-41.
2.
Augoustinos, M., Tuffin, K. and Rapley, M. ( 1999) ‘Genocide or a Failure to Gel? Racism, History and Nationalism inAustralian Talk’, Discourse & Society10(3): 351-78.
3.
Augoustinos, M., LeCouteur, A. and Soyland, J. ( 2002) ‘Self-sufficient Arguments in Political Rhetoric: Constructing Reconciliation and Apologizing to the Stolen Generations’ , Discourse & Society13(1): 105-42.
4.
Augoustinos, M., Tuffin, K. and Every, D. ( 2005) ‘New Racism, Meritocracy and Individualism: Constraining Affirmative Action in Education’, Discourse & Society16(3): 315-40.
5.
Billig, M. ( 1991) Ideology and Opinions. London: Sage.
6.
Billig, M. ( 2001) ‘Humour and Hatred: The Racist Jokes of the Ku Klux Klan’, Discourse & Society12(3): 267-89.
7.
Billig, M., Condor, S., Edwards, D., Gane, M., Middleton, D. and Radley, A.R. ( 1988) Ideological Dilemmas. London: Sage.
8.
Bonilla-Silva, E. and Forman, T.A. ( 2000) ‘"I’m not a Racist, but . . . ": Mapping White College Students’ Racial Ideology in the USA’, Discourse & Society11(1): 50-85.
9.
Brown, P. and Levinson, S.C. ( 1978) ‘Universals in Language Usage: Politeness Phenomena’ , in E.N. Goody (ed.) Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction, pp. 56-289. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
10.
Brown, P. and Levinson, S.C. ( 1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11.
Buttny, R. ( 1999) ‘Discursive Constructions of Racial Boundaries and Self-segregation on Campus’, Journal of Language and Social Psychology18(3): 247-68.
12.
Buttny, R. and Williams, L.P. ( 2000) ‘Demanding Respect: The Uses of Reported Speech in Discursive Construction of Interracial Contact’, Discourse & Society11(1): 109-33.
13.
Calvert, C. ( 1997) ‘Hate Speech and its Harms: A Communication-theory Perspective’, Journal of Communication47(1): 4-19.
14.
Chiang, S.Y. ( 2009) ‘Personal Power and Positional Power in a Power-full "I"’, Discourse & Communication3(3): 255-71.
15.
Clayman, S. and Whalen, J.(1988/1989) ‘When the Medium Becomes Message: The Case of the Rather-Bush Encounter’, Research on Language and Social Interaction22: 241-72.
16.
Cohen, R. ( 1997) Negotiating Across Cultures: International Communication in an Interdependent World. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.
17.
Davies, B. and Harré, R. ( 1990) ‘Positioning: The Discursive Production of Selves’ , Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour20(1): 44-63.
18.
Downing, J.D.H. ( 1999) ‘Hate Speech and First Amendment Absolutism Discourses in the US’, Discourse & Society10(2): 175-89.
19.
Edwards, D. and Potter, J. ( 1992) Discursive Psychology. London: Sage.
20.
Every, D. and Augoustinos, M. ( 2007) ‘Constructions of Racism in the Australian Parliamentary Debates on Asylum Seekers’, Discourse & Society18(4): 411-36.
21.
Fozdar, F. ( 2008) ‘Duelling Discourses, Shared Weapons: Rhetorical Techniques Used to Challenge Racist Arguments’, Discourse & Society19(4): 529-47.
22.
Goffman, E. ( 1967) Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. New York: Pantheon Books.
23.
Goffman, E. ( 1981) Forms of Talk. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
24.
Grice, P.H. ( 1978) ‘Further Notes on Logic and Conversation’ , in P. Cole (ed.) Syntax and Semantics: Pragmatics, pp. 183-97. New York: Academic Press.
25.
Harré, R. and Gillett, G. ( 1994) The Discursive Mind. London: Sage.
26.
Harris, S. ( 2001) ‘Being Politically Impolite: Extending Politeness Theory to Adversarial Political Discourse’, Discourse & Society12(4): 451-72.
27.
Haskell, R.E. ( 2009) ‘Unconscious Linguistic Referents to Race: Analysis and Methodological Frameworks’, Discourse & Society20(1): 59-84.
28.
Heritage, J. ( 2002) ‘The Limits of Questioning: Negative Interrogatives and Hostile Question Content’, Journal of Pragmatics34: 1427-46.
29.
Hofstede, G. ( 2001) Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30.
Hutchby, I. ( 1992) ‘Confrontation Talk: Aspects of "Interruption" in Argument Sequence on Talk Radio’, Text12(3): 343-71.
31.
International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (1965) www.unhchr.ch/html/menu3/b/d_icerd.htm [accessed 15 May 2009].
32.
Lakoff, R. ( 1989) ‘The Limits of Politeness: Therapeutic and Courtroom Discourse’, Multilingua8: 101-29.
33.
Leeper, R. ( 2000) ‘Keegstra and R.A.V.: A Comparative Analysis of theCanadian and U.S. Approaches to Hate Speech Legislation’, Communication Law and Policy5(3): 295-321.
34.
Lynn, N. and Lea, S. ( 2003) ‘"A Phantom Menace and the New Apartheid": The Social Construction of Asylum-seekers in the United Kingdom’, Discourse & Society14(4): 425-52.
35.
Pomerantz, A. ( 1984) ‘Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/ Dispreferred Turn Shapes’, in J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, pp. 57-101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36.
Pomerantz, A. ( 1986) ‘Extreme Case Formulation: A Way of Legitimizing Cases’, Human Studies9: 219-29.
37.
Pomerantz, A. (1988/1989) ‘Constructing Skepticism: Four Devices Used to Engender the Audience’s Skepticism’, Research on Language and Social Interaction22: 293-313.
38.
Potter, J. ( 1996) Representing Reality: Discourse, Rhetoric and Social Construction . London: Sage.
39.
Sanders, R. ( 1991) ‘The Two-way Relationship Between Talk in Social Interaction and Actors’ Goals and Plans’, in K. Tracy (ed.) Understanding Face-to-Face Interaction: Issues Linking Goals and Discourse, pp. 167-88. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
40.
Sanders, R. ( 1995a) ‘A Neo-rhetorical Perspective: The Enactment of Role-identities as Interactive and Strategic’, in S. Sigman (ed.) The Consequentiality of Communication , pp. 67-121. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
41.
Sanders, R. ( 1995b) ‘The Sequential Inferential Theories of Sanders and Gottman’, in D.P. Cushman and B. Kovacic (eds) Watershed Research Traditions in Human Communication Theory, pp. 101-41. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
42.
Schauer, F. ( 2005) The Exceptional First Amendment. Available at: http://ksgnotes1.harvard.edu/Research/wpaper.nsf/rwp/RWP05-021 [accessed 1 July 2009].
43.
Schegloff, E.A. (1988/1989) ‘From Interview toConfrontation: Observations of the Bush-Rather Interview’, Research on Language and Social Interaction22: 215-40.
44.
Simmons, K. and LeCouteur, A. ( 2008) ‘Modern Racism in the Media: Constructions of "the Possibility of Change" in Accounts of Two Australian "Riots"’, Discourse & Society19(5): 667-87.
45.
Smolla, R.A. ( 1992) Free Speech in an Open Society. New York: Knopf.
46.
Smolla, R.A. ( 2000) Smolla and Nimmer on Freedom of Speech. St. Paul, MN: West Group.
47.
Toulmin, S. ( 1958) The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Van Dijk, T.A. ( 1984) Prejudice in Discourse: An Analysis of Ethnic Prejudice in Cognition and Conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
50.
Van Dijk, T.A. ( 1987) Communicating Racism: Ethnic Prejudice in Thought and Talk. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
51.
Van Dijk, T.A. ( 1992) ‘Discourse and the Denial of Racism’, Discourse & Society3(1): 87-118.
52.
Van Dijk, T.A. ( 1993) Elite Discourse and Racism. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
53.
Van Dijk, T.A. ( 1997) ‘Political Discourse and Racism: Describing Others in Western Parliaments’, in S.H. Riggins (ed.) The Language and Politics of Exclusion: Others in Discourse, pp. 31-64. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
54.
Van Dijk, T.A. ( 1999) ‘Discourse and Racism: An Editorial’, Discourse & Society10(2): 147-8.
55.
Van Dijk, T.A. ( 2000) ‘New(s) Racism: A Discourse Analytical Approach’ , in S. Cottle (ed.) Ethnic Minorities and the Media. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
56.
Verkuyten, M. ( 2001) ‘"Abnormalization" of Ethnic Minorities in Conversation’ , British Journal of Social Psychology40: 257-78.
57.
Verkuyten, M. ( 2005) ‘Accounting for Ethnic Discrimination: A Discursive Study among Minority and Majority Groups’, Journal of Language and Social Psychology24: 66-92.
58.
Walker, S. ( 1994) Hate Speech: The History of an American Controversy. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska.
59.
Wetherell, M. and Potter, J. ( 1992) Mapping the Language of Racism: Discourse and the Legitimation of Exploitation. New York: Columbia University Press.
60.
Whillock, R.K. and Slayden, D. (eds) (1995) Hate Speech. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
61.
Wodak, R. and Reisigl, M. ( 2003) ‘Discourse and Racism’, in D. Shiffrin, D. Tannen and H.E. Hamilton (eds) The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, pp. 372-98. Malden, MA: Blackwell .
