The role of teacher identity and micro-level interaction in the construction of power relations in the critical classroom is investigated. This study took place in an American university in an English composition program that had implemented ‘critical pedagogy’, an applied critical theory that has the goal of changing the traditional power relations between teachers and students. Analysis of the institutional context and the discursive construction of teachers’ identities revealed contradictions between this goal and some of the teaching practices and suggested that power was not effectively redistributed as intended. The findings suggest that applied critical theories are often too simplistic, assuming that power can be straightforwardly transferred from the ‘powerful’ to the ‘powerless’. It is argued that proponents of such theories have under-theorized the notion of power, overlooking the paradox of ideology, which points to the role of micro-level interaction in the construction of power relations.
Antaki, C. and Widdicombe, S. (eds) (1998) Identities in Talk. London: Sage.
3.
Berlin, J.A. ( 1987) Rhetoric and Reality: Writing Instruction in American Colleges, 1900-1985. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
4.
Berlin, J.A. ( 1988) ‘Rhetoric and Ideology in the Writing Class’ , College English50(5): 477-94.
5.
Billig, M. ( 1991) Ideology and Opinions. London: Sage.
6.
Billig, M., Condor, S., Edwards, D., Gane, M., Middleton, D. and Radley, A.R. ( 1988) Ideological Dilemmas: A Social Psychology of Everyday Thinking. London: Sage.
7.
Bourdieu, P. ( 1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
8.
Bucholtz, M. and Hall, K. ( 2005) ‘Identity and Interaction: A Sociocultural Linguistic Approach’, Discourse Studies7(4-5): 585-614.
9.
Coleman, B., Brittenham, R., Campbell, S. and Girard, S. ( 2002) Making Sense: Constructing Knowledge in the Arts and Sciences . Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
10.
Coupland, N. ( 2001) ‘Language, Situation, and the Relational Self: Theorizing Dialect-Style in Sociolinguistics’, in P. Eckert and J.R. Rickford (eds) Style and Sociolinguistic Variation, pp. 185-210. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11.
Durst, R.K. ( 1999) Collision Course: Conflict, Negotiation, and Learning in College Composition. Urbana, IL: NCTE.
12.
Edley, N. and Wetherell, M. ( 1997) ‘Jockeying for Position: The Construction of Masculine Identities’, Discourse & Society8: 203-17.
13.
Ellsworth, E. ( 1989) ‘Why Doesn’t This Feel Empowering? Working Through the Repressive Myths of Critical Pedagogy’, Harvard Educational Review59(3): 297-324.
14.
Freire, P. ( 1970) Pedagogy of the Oppressed. London: Penguin.
15.
Freire, P. ( 1985) The Politics of Education: Culture, Power, and Liberation . South Hadley, MA: Bergin and Garvey .
16.
Giroux, H.A. ( 1983) Theory and Resistance in Education. South Hadley, MA: Bergin and Garvey.
17.
Giroux, H.A. ( 1988) Schooling and the Struggle for Public Life: Critical Pedagogy in the Modern Age. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
18.
Gore, J.M. ( 1993) The Struggle for Pedagogies: Critical and Feminist Discourses as Regimes of Truth. New York, NY: Routledge.
19.
Heritage, J. ( 1997) ‘Conversation Analysis and Institutional Talk: Analysing Data’, in D. Silverman (ed.) Qualitative Research: Theory, Method, and Practice, pp. 161-82. London : Sage.
20.
hooks, b. ( 1994) Teaching to Transgress: Education as the Practice of Freedom . New York, NY: Routledge.
21.
Lee, A. ( 2000) Composing Critical Pedagogies: Teaching Writing as Revision . Urbana, IL: NCTE.
22.
Luke, C. ( 1992) ‘Feminist Politics in Radical Pedagogy’, in C. Luke and J.M. Gore (eds) Feminisms and Critical Pedagogy, pp. 25-53. New York, NY: Routledge.
23.
McLaren, P. ( 1988) ‘Schooling the Postmodern Body: Critical Pedagogy and the Politics of Enfleshment’, Journal of Education170(3): 53-83.
24.
Maher, F.A. and Tetreault, M.K. ( 1994) The Feminist Classroom. New York, NY : Basic Books.
25.
Mendoza-Denton, N. ( 2002) ‘Language and Identity’, in J.K. Chambers, P. Trudgill and N. Schilling-Estes (eds) The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, pp. 475-99. Oxford : Blackwell.
26.
Orner, M. ( 1992) ‘Interrupting the Calls for Student Voice in "Liberatory" Education: A Feminist Poststructuralist Perspective’, in C. Luke and J.M. Gore (eds) Feminisms and Critical Pedagogy, pp. 74-89. New York, NY: Routledge.
27.
Potter, J. and Wetherell, M. ( 1987) Discourse and Social Psychology. London : Sage.
28.
Richardson, E. ( 2003) African American Literacies. London : Routledge.
29.
Shor, I. ( 1992) Empowering Education: Critical Teaching for Social Change . Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
30.
Shor, I. ( 1996) When Students Have Power: Negotiating Authority in a Critical Pedagogy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
31.
Trimbur, J. ( 1994) ‘Taking the Social Turn: Teaching Writing Post-process’ , College Composition and Communication45(1): 108-18.
32.
Wetherell, M. ( 1998) ‘Positioning and Interpretative Repertoires: Conversation Analysis and Post-Structuralism in Dialogue’, Discourse & Society9: 387-412.
33.
Widdicombe, S. ( 1998) ‘Identity as an Analysts’ and a Participants’ Resource’, in C. Antaki and S. Widdicombe (eds) Identities in Talk, pp. 191-206. London: Sage.
34.
Widdicombe, S. and Wooffitt, R. ( 1995) The Language of Youth Subcultures: Social Identity in Action. New York, NY: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
35.
Wooffitt, R. ( 2005) Conversation Analysis and Discourse Analysis. London: Sage.
36.
Yin, R.K. ( 2003) Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 3rd edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
