The expert witnesses and courtroom discourse: applying micro and macro forms of discourse analysis to study process and the 'doings of doings' for individuals and for society
Restricted accessOtherFirst published online November, 2008
The expert witnesses and courtroom discourse: applying micro and macro forms of discourse analysis to study process and the 'doings of doings' for individuals and for society
The expert witness in legal proceedings is both a historically necessary part of modern legal proceedings in a society increasingly influenced by science and technology, and a much maligned figure often accused of purporting 'junk science' and of acting as an ethically empty mercenary. While much of the social action that attempts these various subjectifications is done outside of courtrooms, this article takes as its object verbal interaction in actual court proceedings that involve an expert witness. The study takes a combined conversation analytic (specifically, non-sequential, or membership categorization analyses) and discourse analytic (specifically post-structural) perspective. Findings focus on the particular use of categorizations by lawyers, judges and the expert witness in terms of rules of the law and of relevant science in the process of court proceedings and the way those categorizations are then used in subsequent court activities and decisions.
Atkinson, J.M. (1992) 'Displaying Neutrality: Formal Aspects of Informal Court Proceedings', in P. Drew and J. Heritage (eds) Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, pp. 199-211. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2.
Atkinson, J.M. and Drew, P. (1979) Order in Court: The Organizations of Verbal Interaction in Judicial Settings. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.
3.
Baker, C. (1997) 'Ticketing Rules: Categorization and Moral Ordering in a School Staff Meeting', in S. Hester and P. Eglin (eds) Culture in Action: Studies in Membership Categorization Analysis, pp. 77-98. Washington, DC: International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis & University Press of America.
4.
Bronstein, D. (1999) Law for the Expert Witness, 2nd edn. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press .
5.
Collins, H. and Pinch, T. (1998a) 'The Germs of Dissent: Louis Pasteur and the Origins of Life', in The Golem: What You Should Know About Science . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
Collins, H. and Pinch, T. (1998b) 'The World According to Gold: Disputes About the Origins of Oil', in The Golem at Large: What you Should Know About Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
Cuff, E. (1993) Problems of Versions in Everyday Situations, Vol. 2, Studies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis. Washington, DC: International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis & University Press of America.
8.
Deleuze, G. (1995) Negotiations, 1972-1990. New York: Columbia University Press.
9.
Drew, P. (1992) 'Contested Evidence in Courtroom Cross-Examination: The Case of a Trial for Rape', in P. Drew and J. Heritage (eds) Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, pp. 470-520. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
10.
Foucault, M. (1980) 'The Confession of the Flesh', in C. Gordon (ed.) Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews & Other Writings, 1972-1977. New York: Pantheon Books.
11.
Foucault, M. (1983) 'Afterword: The Subject and Power', in Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
12.
Foucault, M. (1990) The History of Sexuality, Vol. 1. New York: Vintage Books.
13.
Foucault, M. (1991) 'Governmentality', in G. Burchell, C. Gordon and P. Miller (eds) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, pp. 87-104. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
14.
Foucault, M. (1993) 'About the Beginning of the Hermeneutics of the Self: Two Lectures at Dartmouth', Political Theory21: 198-227.
15.
Foucault, M. (2000) '"Omnes et Singulatim": Towards a Critique of Political Reason', in J. Faubion (ed.) Power: Essential Works of Foucault 1954-1984, pp. 298-325. New York: The New Press.
16.
Foucault, M. (2003) 'Psychiatric Power': Lectures at the Collège de France, 1973-1974 (G. Burchell, trans., A. Davidson, ed.). New York: Palgrave .
17.
Foucault, M. (2007) 'Security, Territory, Population': Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977-1978 (G. Burchell, trans., A. Davidson, ed.). New York: Palgrave.
18.
Foucault, M., Dreyfus, H. and Rabinow, P. (1983) 'Afterword (1983): On the Genealogy of Ethics: An Overview of a Work in Progress', in Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, pp. 208-28. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
19.
Garfinkel, H. (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
20.
Garfinkel, H. (1972) 'Studies of the Routine Grounds of Everyday Activities' , in D. Sudnow (ed.) Studies in Social Interaction, pp. 1-30. New York: Free Press.
21.
Golan, T. (2004) Laws of Men and Laws of Nature: The History of Scientific Expert Testimony in England and America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22.
Hester, S. and Eglin, P. (1997) 'The Reflexive Constitution of Category, Predicate and Context in Two Settings', in S. Hester and P. Eglin (eds) Culture in Action: Studies in Membership Categorization Analysis, pp. 25-48. Washington, DC: International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis & University Press of America .
23.
Housley, W. and Fitzgerald, R. (2002) 'The Reconsidered Model of Membership Categorization Analysis', Qualitative Research2: 59-83.
24.
Huber, P. (1993) Galileo's Revenge: Junk Science in the Courtroom . New York: Basic Books.
25.
Jasanoff, S. (1995) Science at the Bar: Law, Science, and Technology in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26.
Jayyusi, L. (1984) Categorization and the Moral Order. Boston, MA: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
27.
Jayyusi, L. (1991) 'Values and Moral Judgement: Communicative Praxis as a Moral Order', in G. Button (ed.) Ethnomethodology and the Human Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
Jones, C. (1994) Expert Witnesses: Science, Medicine, and the Practice of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press .
29.
Kuhn, T. (1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd edn. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
30.
Lynch, M. and Bogen, D. (1997) 'Lies, Recollections and Categorical Judgements in Testimony', in S. Hester and P. Eglin (eds) Culture in Action: Studies in Membership Categorization Analysis, pp. 99-121. Washington, DC : International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis & University Press of America.
31.
Meyer, C. (1999) 'Distinguishing Good Science, Bad Science and Junk Science', in C. Meyer (ed.) Expert Witnessing: Explaining and Understanding Science, pp. 99-120. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
32.
Potter, J. (1996) Representing Reality: Discourse, Rhetoric and Social Construction. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
33.
Rose, N. (1999) Governing the Soul: The Shaping of the Private Self, 2nd edn. New York: Free Association Books.
34.
Sacks, H. (1963) 'Sociological Description', Berkeley Journal of Sociology8: 1-16.
35.
Sacks, H. (1967) 'The Search for Help: No One to Turn To', Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley , USA.
36.
Sacks, H. (1972) 'An Initial Investigation of the Usability of Conversational Data for Doing Sociology', in D. Sudnow (ed.) Studies in Social Interaction, pp. 31-74. New York: The Free Press.
37.
Sacks, H. (1979) 'Hotrodder: A Revolutionary Category', in G. Psathas (ed.) Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, pp. 7-14. New York: Irvington.
38.
Sacks, H. (1984a) 'Notes on Methodology', in J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis , pp. 21-7. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39.
Sacks, H. (1984b) 'On Doing "Being Ordinary"', in J. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, pp. 413-29. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40.
Sacks, H. (1992) Harvey Sacks: Lectures on Conversation (G. Jefferson, ed.), Vol. 1-2. Oxford: Blackwell.
41.
Sacks, H. (1997) 'The Lawyer's Work', in M. Travers and J. Manzo (eds) Law in Action: Ethnomethodological and Conversation Analytic Approaches to Law, pp. 43-9. Aldershot: Ashgate.
42.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. and Jefferson, G. (1978) 'A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn Taking for Conversation', in J. Schenkein (ed.) Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction , pp. 7-55. New York: Academic Press.
43.
Schegloff, E. (1987) 'Between Micro and Macro: Contexts and Other Connections' , in J. Alexander, B. Giesen, R. Munch and N. Smelser (eds) The Micro-Macro Link. Berkeley: University of California Press.
44.
Schegloff, E. (1991) 'Reflections on Talk and Social Structure', in D. Boden and D. Zimmerman (eds) Talk and Social Structure: Studies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis, pp. 44-70. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Schegloff, E. (2007) 'A Tutorial on Membership Categorization', Journal of Pragmatics39: 462-82.
47.
Travers, M. and Manzo, J. (1997) Law in Action: Ethnomethodological and Conversation Analytic Approaches to the Law. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate/Dartmouth.
48.
Watson, R. (1997) 'Some General Reflections on "Categorization" and "Sequence" in the Analysis of Conversation', in S. Hester and P. Eglin (eds) Culture in Action: Studies in Membership Categorization Analysis , pp. 49-76. Washington, DC: International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis & University Press of America .
49.
Wetherell, M. (1998) 'Positioning and Interpretive Repertoires: Conversation Analysis and Post-structuralism in Dialog', Discourse & Society9: 387-412.
