Although the world wide web has become a popular object of and tool for different kinds of semiotic and linguistic investigation, critical discourse analysis (CDA) does not seem to share this enthusiasm in equal measure. The contemporary relevance of the web as a key site for the articulation of social issues should make it a prime target for critical discourse analysts with a political and emancipatory brief. Nonetheless, CDA publications are still predominantly based on conventional, non-electronic sources of data. This article discusses the analytic potential that web-based data opens up and also identifies the specific challenges that arise as a result. These are linked to the size of the web, its diversity, ephemeral quality, interactivity, and multimodality. Indicating directions in which future research might proceed, the article makes a plea for more critical discourse analysts to work with web-based corpora.
Bailey, B. (2000) ‘Communicative Behaviour and Conflict Between African-American Customers and Korean Immigrant Retailers in Los Angeles’ , Discourse & Society11: 86–108 .
2.
Bergman, M.K. (2001) ‘The Deep Web: Surfacing Hidden Value’ , The Journal of Electronic Publishing7(1). Available [accessed 15 January 2004]: http://www.press.umich.edu/jep/07-01/bergman.html
3.
Billig, M. (2001) ‘Humour and Hatred: The Racist Jokes of the Ku Klux Klan’ , Discourse & Society12: 267–290 .
4.
Burbules, N.C. (2002) ‘The Web as a Rhetorical Place’, in I. Snyder (ed.) Silicon Literacies. Communication, Innovation and Education in the Electronic Age, pp. 75–84. London: Routledge .
5.
Caldas-Coulthard, C.R. (2005) ‘Personal Web Pages and the Semiotic Construction of Academic Identities’, in C.R. Caldas-Coulthard and M. Toolan (eds) The Writer's Craft, The Culture's Technology, pp. 23–46. Amsterdam: Rodopi .
6.
Chadwick, A. and May, C. (2003) ‘Interaction between States and Citizens in the Age of the Internet: “e-Government” in the United States, Britain, and the European Union’ , Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions16: 271–300 .
7.
Chandler, D. and Roberts-Young, D. (1998) ‘The Construction of Identity in the Personal Homepages of Adolescents’, Available [accessed 20 January 2004]: http://www.aber.ac.uk/media/Documents/short/strasbourg.html
8.
Cheng, M. (2002) ‘The Standoff – What Is Unsaid? A Pragmatic Analysis of the Conditional Marker “if ”’ , Discourse & Society13: 309–318 .
9.
Cheung, C. (2000) ‘A Home on the Web: Presentations of Self on Personal Homepages’, in D. Gauntlett (ed.) Web.Studies. Rewiring Media Studies for the Digital Age, pp. 43–51. London: Arnold .
10.
Chouliaraki, L. and Fairclough, N. (1999) Discourse in Late Modernity. Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press .
Dahlberg, L. (2001) ‘The Internet and Democratic Discourse. Exploring the Prospects of Online Deliberative Forums Extending the Public Sphere’ , Information, Communication and Society4: 615–633 .
13.
de Vaus, D. (2004) ‘Internet Surveys’, in S. Becker and A. Bryman (eds) Understanding Research for Social Policy and Practice. Themes, Methods and Approaches, pp. 216–220. Bristol: Policy Press .
14.
DiMaggio, P. , Hargittai, E. , Neuman, W.R. and Robinson, J.P. (2001) ‘Social Implications of the internet’ , Annual Review of Sociology27: 307–336 .
15.
Erjavec, K. (2004) ‘Beyond Advertising and Journalism: Hybrid Promotional News Discourse’ , Discourse & Society15: 553–578 .
16.
Fairclough, N. (2003) Analysing Discourse. Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge .
17.
Fairclough, N. and R. Wodak (1997) ‘Critical Discourse Analysis’, in T.A. van Dijk (ed.) Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. Vol. 2: Discourse as Social Interaction, pp. 258–284. London: Sage .
18.
Fletcher, W.H. (2001) ‘Concordancing the Web with Kwic Finder’ , Paper presented at the Third North American Symposium on Corpus Linguistics and Language Teaching, Boston, MA, 23–25March 2001. Available [accessed 20 November 2003]: http://www.kwicfinder.com/FletcherCLT2001.pdf
19.
Fletcher, W.H. (2004a) ‘Making the Web More Useful as a Source for Linguistic Corpora’, in U. Connor and T. A. Upton (eds) Applied Corpus Linguistics. A Multidimensional Perspective, pp. 191–206. (Language and Computers – Studies in Practical Linguistics 52.) Amsterdam: Rodopi .
20.
Fletcher, W.H. (2004b) ‘Facilitating the Compilation and Dissemination of Ad-Hoc Web Corpora’, in G. Aston , S. Bernardini and D. Stewart (eds) Corpora and Language Learners, pp. 273–300. Amsterdam: John Benjamins .
21.
Garcia, A.C. (2000) ‘Negotiating Negotiation: the Collaborative Production of Resolution in Small Claims Mediation Hearings’ , Discourse & Society11: 315–344 .
22.
Garton, L. , Haythornthwaite, C. and Wellman, B. (1999): ‘Studying On-Line Social Networks’, in S. Jones (ed.) Doing Internet Research: Critical Issues and Methods for Examining the Net, pp. 75–105. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
23.
Gauntlett, D. (2000) ‘Web Studies: A User's Guide’, in D. Gauntlett (ed.) Web.Studies. Rewiring Media Studies for the Digital Age, pp. 2–18. London: Arnold .
24.
Glaser, B.G. and Strauss, A.L. (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago, IL: Aldine .
25.
Hanak, I. (1998) ‘Chairing Meetings: Turn and Topic-Control in Development Communication in Rural Zanzibar’ , Discourse & Society9: 33–56 .
26.
Harasim, L.M. , Hiltz, R. , Turoff, M. and Teles, L. (1995) Learning Networks. A Field Guide to Teaching and Learning Online. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
27.
Hardt-Mautner, G. (1995) ‘Only Connect. Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics’, Unit for Computer Research on the English Language Technical Papers 6, Lancaster University . http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/computing/research/ucrel/papers/techpaper/vol6.pdf
28.
Harrison, S. (2003) ‘Computer-Mediated Interaction: Using Discourse Maps to Represent Multi-Party, Multi-Topic Asynchronous Discussions’, in S. Sarangi and T. van Leeuwen (eds) Applied Linguistics and Communities of Practice. Selected Papers from the Annual Meeting of the British Association for Applied Linguistics, Cardiff University, September 2002, pp. 60–80. London and New York: Continuum .
29.
Herring, S.C. (ed.) (1996) Computer-Mediated Communication. Linguistic, Social and Cross-Cultural Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins .
30.
Hogben, S. and Coupland, J. (2000) ‘Egg Seeks Sperm. End of Story...? Articulating Gay Parenting in Small Ads for Reproductive Partners’ , Discourse & Society11: 459–486 .
31.
Hudson, J. (2002) ‘Digitising the Structures of Government: The UK's Information Age Government Agenda’ , Policy & Politics30: 515–531 .
32.
Janich, N. (2002) ‘Wirtschaftswerbung offline und online – eine Bestandsaufnahme’, in C. Thimm (ed.) Unternehmenskommunikation offline/online. Wandelprozesse interner und externer Kommunikation durch neue Medien.Frankfurt/Main: Lang.
33.
Keat, R. and Abercrombie, N. (eds) (1991) Enterprise Culture. London: Routledge .
34.
Kendall, L. (1999) ‘Recontextualizing ‘Cyberspace’. Methodological Considerations for On-Line Research’, in S. Jones (ed.) Doing internet Research: Critical Issues and Methods for Examining the Net, pp. 57–74. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
35.
Kilgarriff, A. and Grefenstette, G. (2003) ‘Introduction to the Special Issue on the Web as Corpus’ , Computational Linguistics29: 333–347 . Available [accessed 20 January 2004]: http://www-mitpress.mit.edu/journals/pdf/coli_29_3_333_0.pdf
36.
Koller, V. and Mautner, G. (2004) ‘Computer Applications in Critical Discourse Analysis’, in A. Hewings , C. Coffin and K. O’Halloran (eds) Applying English Grammar, pp. 216–228. London: Arnold .
Lawrence, S. and Giles, C.L. (1999, 8 July) ‘Accessibility of Information on the Web’ , Nature400: 107–109 .
39.
Lazar, A. and Lazar, M.M. (2004) ‘The Discourse of the New World Order: ‘Out-Casting’ the Double Face of Threat’ , Discourse & Society15: 223–242 .
40.
Lemke, J. (1999) ‘Discourse and Organizational Dynamics: website Communication and Institutional Change’ , Discourse & Society10: 21–47 .
41.
Lemke, J. (2002) ‘Travels in Hypermodality’ , Visual Communication1: 299–325 .
42.
Lemke, J. (2004) ‘Critical Analysis Across Media: Games, Franchises, and the New Cultural Order’ , Paper presented at the First International Conference on Critical Discourse Analysis, Valencia 2004. Available [accessed 10 January 2005]: http://wwwpersonal.umich.edu/%7Ejaylemke/papers/Franchises/Valencia-CDA-Franchises.htm.
43.
Leudar, I. , and Nekvapil, J. (2000) ‘Presentations of Romanies in the Czech Media: On Category Work in Television Debates’ , Discourse & Society11: 487–514 .
44.
Lynn, N. and Lea, S. (2003), ‘“A Phantom Menace and the New Apartheid”: The Social Construction of Asylum-Seekers in the United Kingdom’ , Discourse & Society14: 425–452 .
45.
Martin, A. (2003), ‘Towards E-literacy’, in A. Martin and H. Rader (eds), Information and IT Literacy: Enabling Learning in the 21st Century, pp. 3–23. London: Facet .
46.
Markoff, J. (2005) ‘Debating the Size of the Web’, International Herald Tribune16 August 2005. Available [accessed 25 September 2005]: http://www.iht.com/articles/2005/08/15/business/web.php
47.
Mautner, G. (2001) ‘Menügesteuert. Konkordanzprogramme im Dienste qualitativer Diskursanalyse’ [Menu-driven. Using Concordance Programs in Qualitative Discourse Analysis.], in H. Gruber and F. Menz (eds), Interdisziplinarität in der Angewandten Sprachwissenschaft. Methodenmenü oder– salat?Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang .
48.
Mautner, G. (forthcoming) ‘The Entrepreneurial University: a Discursive Profile of a Higher Education Buzzword’ . To appear in Critical Discourse Studies2(2).
49.
McIlvenny, P. and Raudaskoski, P. (2005) ‘Mediating Discourses of Transnational Adoption on the Internet’, in S. Norris and R. Jones (eds), Discourse in Action: Introduction to Mediated Discourse Analysis, pp. 62–72. London: Routledge .
50.
Menz, F. (1999) ‘“Who Am I Gonna Do This With?”: Self-Organization, Ambiguity and Decision-Making in a Business Enterprise’ , Discourse & Society10: 101–128 .
51.
Meyer, C.F. (2003) ‘The World Wide Web as Linguistic Corpus’, in P. Leistyna and C.F. Meyer (eds) Corpus Analysis: Language Structure and Language Use, pp. 241–254. Amsterdam: Rodopi .
52.
Mitra, A. and Cohen, E. (1999) ‘Analyzing the Web: Directions and Challenges’, in S. Jones (ed.) Doing Internet Research: Critical Issues and Methods for Examining the Net, pp. 179–202. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
53.
Nakauchi, K. , Ishikawa, Y. , Morikawa, H. and Aoyama, T. (2003) ‘Peer-to-Peer Keyword Search Using Keyword Relationship’ , in Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Global and Peer-to-Peer Computing on Large Scale Distributed Systems (GP2PC 2003). Available [accessed 15 January 2004]: http://www.mlab.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp/publications/2003/nakauchi-gp2pc03.pdf
54.
O’Halloran, K. and Coffin, C. (2004) ‘Checking Overinterpretation and Underinterpretation. Help from Corpora in Critical Linguistics’, in A. Hewings , C. Coffin and K. O’Halloran (eds), Applying English Grammar, pp. 275–297. London: Arnold .
55.
Oteiza, T. (2003) ‘How Contemporary History is Presented in Chilean Middle School Textbooks’ , Discourse & Society14: 639–660 .
56.
Piper, A. (2000) ‘Some Have Credit Cards and Others Have Giro Cheques: “Individuals” and “People” as Lifelong Learners in Late Modernity’ , Discourse & Society11: 515–542 .
57.
Poser, W.J. (2002) ‘Small Languages and Small Language Communities’ , International Journal of the Sociology of Language158: 227–237 .
58.
Richardson, J.E. (2001) ‘Now is the Time to Put an End to All This’: Argumentative Discourse Theory and ‘Letters to the Editor’ , Discourse & Society12: 143–168 .
59.
Richardson, K. (2001) ‘Risk News in the World of internet Newsgroups’ , Journal of Sociolinguistics5(1): 50–72 .
60.
Ryder, M. and Wilson, B. (1996) ‘Affordances and Constraints of the internet for Learning and Instruction’ , Paper presented to the Association for Educational Communications Technology, Indianapolis, 14–18 February. Available [accessed 24 October 2003]: http://carbon.cudenver.edu/%7Emryder/aect_96.html
61.
Scharl, A. , Pollach, I. and Bauer, C. (2003) ‘Determining the Semantic Orientation of web-based Corpora’, in J. Liu et al. (eds) Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning(Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 2016). Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag .
62.
Schmitz, U. (2002) ‘Qualität und Reklame im WWW. Zur Gestaltung von Internet-Auftritten deutscher Wirtschaftsunternehmen’ [Quality and Advertising on the WWW. On the Web-Presence of German Firms.], in C. Thimm (ed.) Unternehmenskommunikation offline/online. Wandelprozesse interner und externer Kommunikation durch neue Medien. Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang .
63.
Seale, C. (2004) ‘Sampling in Qualitative Research’, in S. Becker and A. Bryman (eds) Understanding Research for Social Policy and Practice. Themes, Methods and Approaches, pp. 261–267. Bristol: Policy Press .
64.
Snyder, I. (2002) ‘Silicon Literacies’, in I. Snyder (ed.) Silicon Literacies. Communication, Innovation and Education in the Electronic Age. London: Routledge .
65.
Snyder, I. (ed.) (2002) Silicon Literacies. Communication, Innovation and Education in the Electronic Age. London: Routledge .
66.
Stubbs, M. (1996) Text and Corpus Analysis: Computer-Assisted Studies of Language and Culture. Oxford: Blackwell .
67.
Thurlow, C. , Lengel, L. and Tomic, A. (2004) Computer-Mediated Communication. Social Interaction and the Internet. London: Sage .
68.
Trix, F. and Psenka, C. (2003) ‘Exploring the Color of Glass: Letters of Recommendation for Female and Male Medical Faculty’ , Discourse & Society14: 191–220 .
69.
Volk, M. (2002) ‘Using the Web as Corpus for Linguistic Research’, in R. Pajusalu and T. Hennoste (eds) Tähendusepüüdja. Catcher of the Meaning. A Festschrift for Professor Haldur iim.Publications of the Department of General Linguistics 3. University of Tartu, Estonia . Available [accessed 10 November 2003]: http://www.unizh.ch./cl/volk/papers/OIM_Festschrift_2002.pdf
70.
Wakeford, N. (2000) ‘New Media, New Methodologies: Studying the Web’, in D. Gauntlett (ed.) web.studies. Rewiring Media Studies for the Digital Age, pp. 31–41. London: Arnold .
71.
Wellman, B. , Quan-Haase, A. , Boase, J. , Chen, W. , Hampton, K. , Isla de Diaz, I. and Miyata, K. (2003) ‘The Social Affordances of the Internet for Networked Individualism’ , Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication8(3). Available [accessed 25 November 2003]: http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol8/issue3/wellman.html
72.
Wodak, R. and Wright, S. (forthcoming) ‘The European Union in Cyberspace: Democratic Participation via Online Multilingual Discussion Boards?’, in B. Danet and S. Herring (eds) The Multilingual Internet. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
