Avise, J.C. (2001) ‘ Evolving Genomic Metaphors: A New Look at the Language of DNA ’, Science294: 86–87 .
2.
Beck, U. (1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
3.
Chew, M.K. and Laubichler, M.D. (2003) ‘ Natural Enemies – Metaphor or Misconception? ’, Science301: 52–53 .
4.
Dingwall, R. (1999) ‘ Risk Society: The Cult of Theory and the Millennium ’, Social Policy and Administration33(4): 474–491 .
5.
Kidd, K. and Nerlich, B. (eds) (2004a) Special issue on ‘The New Genetics: Linguistic and Literary Metaphors and the Social Constructionof the Genome’, Science as Culture, manuscript in preparation.
6.
Kidd, K. and Nerlich, B. (eds) (2004b) Special issue on ‘Historical and Contemporary Perspectives on the Cultural Discourse of Genes’, New Genetics and Society, manuscript in preparation.
7.
Nerlich, B. and Clarke, D.D. (2003) ‘ Anatomy of a Media Event:How Arguments Clashed in the 2001 Human Cloning Debate ’, New Genetics and Society22(1): 43–59 .
8.
Nerlich, B. , Clarke, D.D. and Dingwall, R. (2000) ‘ Clones and Crops: The Use of Stock Characters and Word Play in Two Debates About Bioengineering ’, Metaphor and Symbol15(4): 223–240 .
9.
Nerlich, B. , Clarke, D.D. and Dingwall, R. (2001) ‘ Fictions, Fantasies, and Fears: The Literary Foundations of the Cloning Debate ’, Journal of Literary Semantics30: 37–52 .
10.
Nerlich, B. and Dingwall, R. (2003) ‘Deciphering the Human Genome: The Semantic and Ideological Foundations of Genetic and Genomic Discourse’, in R. Dirven , R. Frank and M. Pütz (eds) Cognitive Models in Language and Thought: Ideologies, Metaphors and Meaning, pp. 395–428. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter .
11.
Nerlich, B. , Dingwall, R. and Clarke, D.D. (2002) ‘ The Book of Life: How the Human Genome Project was Revealed to the Public ’, Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine6(5): 445–469 .
12.
Nerlich, B. , Johnson, S. and Clarke, D.D. (2003) ‘ The First “Designer Baby”: The Role of Narratives, Clichés and Metaphors in the Year 2000 Media Debate ’, Science as Culture12(4): 471–498 .