This article employs `grammar and interaction' — a new strand of conversation analysis — to contribute to the debate concerning the utility of conversation analysis for feminist research by exploring methods for making gender orientations accessible for analysis. We examine mixed-sex conversations in Japanese, in which participants discuss each other's outward appearance in general, and body weight in particular. We propose that certain `breaches' of conversational organization can usefully be explained in terms of a possibly competing, normative `gender constraint' involving orientations towards a man's expanded rights to topicalize, assess, demand and dictate standards of women's outward appearance. It is further suggested that this constraint may cut across a plethora of rudimentary organizations of conversation. The proposed constraint is shown to be oriented to or resisted by participants through the contingent mobilization of grammatical, prosodic and semantic resources to constitute themselves and others as `men' or `women' vis-à-vis this constraint.
Billig, M. (1999) `Whose Terms? Whose Ordinariness? Rhetoric and Ideology in Conversation Analysis', Discourse & Society10: 543-58.
2.
Couper-Kuhlen, E. and Selting, M. (eds) (1996) Prosody in Conversation: Interactional Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
Davis, K. (1988) `Paternalism Under the Microscope', in A.D. Todd and S. Fisher (eds) Gender and Discourse: The Power of Talk, pp. 19-54. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
4.
Drew, P. (1991) `Asymmetries of Knowledge in Conversational Interactions' , in I. Marková and K. Foppa (eds) Asymmetries in Dialogue , pp. 21-48. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
5.
Edwards, D. (1998) `The Relevant Thing about Her: Social Identity Categories in Use', in C. Antaki and S. Widdicombe (eds) Identities in Talk, pp. 15-33. London: Sage.
6.
Fishman, P.M. (1978) `Interaction: The Work Women Do', Social Problems25: 397-406.
7.
Fukushima, M. (2000) Display of Relationality in Different Contexts in Japanese Conversation. Unpublished M.A. dissertation, University of Essex.
8.
Haig, J.H. (1990) `A Phonological Difference in Male-Female Speech among Teenagers in Nagoya', in S. Ide and N.H. McGloin (eds) Aspects of Japanese Women's Language, pp. 5-22. Tokyo : Kurosio.
9.
Harding, S. (1986) The Science Question in Feminism. Milton Keynes: Open University.
10.
Heritage, J. (1984) Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge, U.K.: Polity Press.
11.
Hopper, R. and LeBaron, C. (1998) `How Gender Creeps into Talk', Research on Language and Social Interaction31(3): 59-74.
12.
Hutchby, I. (1996) `Power in Discourse: The Case of Arguments on a British Talk Radio Show', Discourse & Society7: 481-97.
13.
Ide, S. (1990) `How and Why Do Women Speak More Politely in Japanese?' , in S. Ide and N.H. McGloin (eds) Aspects of Japanese Women's Language, pp. 63-79. Tokyo: Kurosio.
14.
Ide, S., Hori, M., Kawasaki, A., Ikuta, S. and Haga, H. (1986) `Sex Difference and Politeness in Japanese', International Journal of the Sociology of Language58: 25-36.
15.
Ide, S. and McGloin, N.H. (eds) (1990) Aspects of Japanese Women's Language. Tokyo: Kurosio.
16.
Itakura, H. (2001) Conversational Dominance and Gender: A Study of Japanese Speakers in First and Second Language Contexts. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
17.
Kataoka, K. (1995) `Affect in Japanese Women's Letter Writing: Use of Sentence-Final Particles Ne and Yo and Orthographic Conventions', Pragmatics5: 427-53.
18.
Kessler, S.J. and McKenna, W. (1978) Gender: An Ethnomethodological Approach. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kitzinger, C. and Frith, H. (1999) `Just Say No? The Use of Conversation Analysis in Developing a Feminist Perspective on Sexual Refusal', Discourse & Society10: 293-316.
21.
Linell, P. and Luckmann, T. (1991) `Asymmetries in Dialogue: Some Conceptual Preliminaries' , in I. Marková and K. Foppa (eds) Asymmetries in Dialogue , pp. 1-20. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
22.
Loveday, L. (1986) Exploration in Japanese Sociolinguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
23.
McGloin, N.H. (1990) `Sex Difference and Sentence-Final Particles', in S. Ide and N.H. McGloin (eds) Aspects of Japanese Women's Language, pp. 23-41. Tokyo: Kurosio.
24.
Meguro, Y. and Yazawa, S. (eds) (2000) Shooshika Jidai no Gender to Hahaoya Ishiki. [Gender and Maternal Consciousness in the Age of a Reduction in the Number of Children.]Tokyo: Shinyoosha.
25.
Ochs, E. (1992) `Indexing Gender', in A. Duranti and C. Goodwin (eds) Rethinking Context, pp. 335-58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26.
Ochs, E., Schegloff, E.A. and Thompson, S.A. (eds) (1996) Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
27.
Orbach, S. (1978) Fat is a Feminist Issue. London : Arrow Books.
28.
Pomerantz, A.M. (1978) `Compliment Responses: Notes on the Co-operation of Multiple Constraints', in J.N. Schenkein (ed.) Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction , pp. 79-112. New York: Academic Press.
29.
Pomerantz, A.M. (1984) `Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes', in J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis , pp. 57-101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30.
Sacks, H. (1987) `On the Preferences for Agreement and Contiguity in Sequences in Conversation', in G. Button and J.R.E. Lee (eds) Talk and Social Organisation, pp. 54-69. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
31.
Sacks, H. (1995) Lectures on Conversation, Vols I and II. Oxford: Blackwell.
32.
Schegloff, E.A. (1986) `Sequencing in Conversational Openings', in J.J. Gumperz and D. Hymes (eds) Directions in Sociolinguistics, pp. 346-80. Oxford : Blackwell.
33.
Schegloff, E.A. (1991) `Reflections on Talk and Social Structure', in D. Boden and D.H. Zimmerman (eds) Talk and Social Structure: Studies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis, pp. 44-70. Cambridge : Polity Press.
Selting, M. and Couper-Kuhlen, E. (eds) (2001) Studies in Interactional Linguistics . Amsterdam: Benjamins.
36.
Shibamoto, J.S. (1990) `Sex Related Variations in the Ellipsis of wa and ga in Japanese', in S. Ide and N.H. McGloin (eds) Aspects of Japanese Women's Language, pp. 81-104. Tokyo: Kurosio.
37.
Speer, S.A. (1999) `Feminism and Conversation Analysis: An Oxymoron?' , Feminism and Psychology9: 471-8.
38.
Stokoe, E.H. and Smithson, J. (2001) `Making Gender Relevant: Conversation Analysis and Gender Categories in Interaction', Discourse & Society , 12: 243-69.
39.
Tanaka, H. (1999a) Turn-Taking in Japanese Conversation: A Study in Grammar and Interaction. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
40.
Tanaka, H. (1999b) `Grammar and Social Interaction in Japanese and Anglo-American English: The Display of Context, Social Identity and Social Relation', Human Studies22: 363-95.
41.
Tanaka, H. (2001) `The Implementation of Possible Cognitive Shifts in Japanese Conversation: Complementisers as Pivotal Devices', in M. Selting and E. Couper-Kuhlen (eds) Studies in Interactional Linguistics, pp. 81-109. Amsterdam : Benjamins.
42.
Tanaka, K. (1995) `The New Feminist Movement in Japan, 1970-1990' , in K. Fujimura-Fanselow and A. Kameda (eds) Japanese Women: New Feminist Perspectives on the Past, Present, and Future. New York : The Feminist Press.
43.
Weatherall, A. (2000) `Gender Relevance in Talk-in-Interaction and Discourse' , Discourse & Society, 11: 286-8.
44.
Wetherell, M. (1998) `Positioning and Interpretative Repertoires: Conversation Analysis and Post-Structuralism in Dialogue', Discourse & Society9: 387-412.
45.
Wetzel, P. (1988) `Are "Powerless" Communication Strategies the Japanese Norm?', Language in Society17: 555-64.
