Radio phone-in programmes have been the subject of a number of studies using the methodology of conversation analysis. Although this has been successful in making apparent the sequential organization of this type of interaction, little has been said about its categorial organization. Adopting an ethnomethodological approach, it is demonstrated in this article that interaction on public access radio can be seen to rely upon categorial and sequential identities built up and developed upon over the course of interaction. By paying attention to the categorial features within media interaction, together with the sequential organization, it is possible to examine the way identities are reflexively developed in conjunction with the sequential flow of interaction. This in turn allows an analysis able to address the multilayered organizational methods used by members as part of the on-going flow of interaction.
Atkinson, J.M. and Heritage, J. (eds) (1984) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2.
Boden, D. and Zimmerman, D.H. (eds) (1992) Talk and Social Structure . Oxford: Polity Press.
3.
Eglin, P. and Hester, S. (1992) `Category, Predicate and Task: The Pragmatics of Practical Action', Semiotica88(3/4): 243-68.
4.
Fitzgerald, R. (1999) `Method in Media Interaction: An Ethnomethodological Analysis of a Radio Phone-in', unpublished PhD thesis, University of Wales, Bangor.
5.
Hester, S. and Eglin, P. (1997) `Membership Categorization Analysis: An Introduction' , in S. Hester and P. Eglin (eds) Culture in Action. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
6.
Hester, S. and Fitzgerald, R. (1999) `Category, Predicate and Task: Some Organisational Features in a Radio Talk Show', in P. Jalbert (ed.) Media Studies: Ethnomethodological Approaches. SECA , No. 5. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
7.
Housley, W. (2002) `Moral Discrepancy and "Fudging the Issue" in a Radio News Interview', Sociology36(1): 5-23.
8.
Housley, W. and Fitzgerald, R. (2001) `Categorisation, Narrative and Devolution in Wales' , Sociological Research Online6(2).
9.
Housley, W. and Fitzgerald, R. (2002) `The Reconsidered Model of Membership Categorization' , Qualitative Research2(1): 59-74.
10.
Housley, W. and Fitzgerald, R. (in press) Media Discourse, Policy and Debate.
11.
Hutchby, I. (1991) `The Organization of Talk on Talk Radio', in P. Scannell (ed.) Broadcast Talk . London: Sage.
12.
Hutchby, I. (1992a) `Confrontation Talk: Aspects of "Interruption" in Argument Sequences on Talk Radio', Text12(3): 343-71.
13.
Hutchby, I. (1992b) `The Pursuit of Controversy: Routine Scepticism in Talk on "Talk Radio" ', Sociology26(4): 673-94.
14.
Hutchby, I. (1995) `Aspects of Recipient Design in Expert Advice Giving on Call-in Radio', Discourse Processes19: 217- 38.
15.
Hutchby, I. (1996a) Confrontation Talk: Arguments, Asymmetries, and Power on Talk Radio. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
16.
Hutchby, I. (1996b) `Power in Discourse: The Case of Arguments on a British Talk Radio Show', Discourse and Society7(4): 481-97.
17.
Hutchby, I. (1999) `Frame Attunement and Footing in the Organisation of Talk Radio Openings', Journal of Sociolinguistics3(1): 41-63.
18.
Hutchby, I. (2001) `Witnessing: The Use of First Hand Knowledge in Legitimating Lay Opinions on Talk Radio', Discourse Studies3(4): 481-97.
19.
Liddicoat, A., Brown, A., Dopke, S. and Love, K. (1992) `The Effect of the Institution: Openings in Talkback Radio', Text12(4): 541-62.
20.
Sacks, H. (1972) `On the Analyzability of Stories by Children', in J.J. Gumperz and D. Hymes (eds) Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication. New York: Holt, Rhinehart and Winston.
21.
Sacks, H. (1995) Lectures on Conversation, Vols I and II. (ed. G. Jefferson, intro. E.A. Schegloff ). London: Blackwell .
22.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E.A. and Jefferson, G. (1974) `A Simplest Systematics for the Organisation of Turn-Taking for Conversation', Language50(4): 696-735.
23.
Schegloff, E.A. (1995) `In Another Context', in A. Duranti and C. Goodwin (eds) Rethinking Context. Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. Studies in the Social and Cultural Foundations of Language, No. 11. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24.
Scheufele, D.A. (2000) `Talk or Conversation? Dimensions of Interpersonal Discussion and Their Implications for Participatory Democracy', Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly77(4): 727-43.
25.
Silverman, D. (1998) Harvey Sacks: Social Science and Conversation Analysis . Oxford: Polity Press.
26.
Thornborrow, J. (2001a) `Questions and Control: The Organisation of Talk in Calls to a Radio Phone-in', Discourse Studies3(1): 119-43.
27.
Thornborrow, J. (2001b) `Authenticating Talk: Building Public Identities in Audience Participation Broadcasts', Discourse Studies3(4): 459-79.
28.
Watson, D.R. (1978) `Categorization, Authorization and Blame - Negotiation in Conversation', Sociology12(1): 105-13.
29.
Watson, D.R. (1994) `Harvey Sacks' Sociology of Mind in Action. Review Article', Theory Culture and Society11(4): 169-86.
30.
Watson, R. (1997) `Some General Reflections on "Categorization" and "Sequence" in the Analysis of Conversation', in S. Hester and P. Eglin (eds) Culture in Action. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
