The techniques of discursive psychology were used to analyze the discourse of offence descriptions in criminal trial judgments in recent cases of child sexual abuse in Canada. In certain cases, descriptions of the complaints provided resources that judges mobilized as a warrant for doubt by contrasting children's negative reception of sexual abuse with the innocuous or positive character of subsequent social contact with offenders. This argument emphasizes the agency of children in consenting to affiliate with offenders, presuming that authentic victims can and would avoid further involvement. Although a child's consent to sexual contact is no longer a possible defence under Canadian law, these findings show how the notion of consent can enter current trial decisions. Recommendations suggest ways of incorporating alternative conceptions of abuse in which repeated contact with offenders is viewed as consonant with children's dependent relationships with familiar (and often familial) abusers.
Antaki, C. (1994) Explaining and Arguing: The Social Organization of Accounts. London: Sage.
2.
Badgley, C. R. (1984) Sexual Offences Against Children. Ottawa: Supply and Services Canada.
3.
Bal, M. (1985) Narratology: Introduction to the Theory of Narrative. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
4.
Bark, P. and Sheehy, N.P. (1986) `An Empirical Review of Judicial Proceedings in Cases of Child Sexual Abuse', Early Child Development & Care26: 19-27.
5.
Bays, J. and Chadwick, C. (1993) `Medical Diagnosis of the Sexually Abused Child', Child Abuse & Neglect17: 91-110.
6.
Bergmann, J.R. (1992) `Veiled Morality: Notes on Discretion in Psychiatry', in P. Drew and J. Heritage (eds) Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, pp. 137-162. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
Billig, M. (1989) `The Argumentative Nature of Holding Strong Views: A Case Study', European Journal of Social Psychology19: 203-223.
8.
Billig, M. (1996 [1987]) Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
Billig, M. (1999) Freudian Repression: Conversation Creating the Unconscious. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Bumby, K.M. and Maddox, M.C. (1999) `Judges' Knowledge about Sexual Offenders, Difficulties Presiding Over Sexual Offense Cases, and Opinions on Sentencing, Treatment, and Legislation', Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment11: 305-315.
11.
Bussey, K. and Grimbeek, E.J. (1995) `Disclosure Processes: Issues for Child Sexual Abuse Victims', in K.J. Rotenberg (ed.) Disclosure Processes in Children and Adolescents, pp. 106-203. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
Buttny, R. (1993) Social Accountability in Communication. London: Sage.
13.
Cederborg, A.-C. (1999) `The Construction of Children's Credibility in Judgements of Child Sexual Abuse', Acta Sociologica42: 147-158.
14.
Coates, L. (2000, July) `Active vs. Passive Constructions of Consent', in J. Bavelas (chair) Language in Legal Judgments about Sexual Offences. Symposium conducted at the 7th International Conference on Language and Social Psychology, Cardiff, Wales, UK.
15.
Coates, L. , Bavelas, J.B. and Gibson, J. (1994) `Anomalous Language in Sexual Assault Trial Judgments', Discourse & Society5: 189-206.
16.
Danet, B. (1980) `Language in the Legal Process', Law and Society Review14: 445-564.
17.
DeJong, A. and Rose, M. (1991) `Legal Proof of Child Sexual Abuse in the Absence of Physical Evidence', Pediatrics88: 506-511.
18.
Drew, P. and Holt, E. (1988) `Complainable Matters: The Use of Idiomatic Expressions in Making Complaints', Social Problems35: 398-417.
19.
Edwards, D. (1994) `Script Formulations: An Analysis of Event Descriptions in Conversation', Journal of Language and Social Psychology13: 211-247.
20.
Edwards, D. (1997) Discourse and Cognition. London: Sage.
21.
Edwards, D. (1999) `Emotion Discourse', Culture & Psychology5: 271-291.
22.
Edwards, D. (2000) `Extreme Case Formulations: Softeners, Investment, and Doing Nonliteral', Research on Language and Social Interaction33: 347-373.
23.
Edwards, D. and Potter, J. (1992) Discursive Psychology. London: Sage.
24.
Ehrlich, S. (1998) `The Discursive Reconstruction of Sexual Consent', Discourse & Society9: 149-171.
25.
Elliott, M. , Brown, K. and Kilcoyne, J. (1995) `Child Sexual Abuse Prevention: What Offenders Tell Us', Child Abuse & Neglect19: 579-594.
26.
Fitzpatrick, P. (1992) The Myth of Modern Law. London: Routledge.
27.
Frohmann, L. (1991) `Discrediting Victims' Allegations of Sexual Assault: Prosecutorial Accounts of Case Rejections', Social Problems38: 213-226.
28.
Furniss, T. (1991) The Multi-Professional Handbook of Child Sexual Abuse: Integrated Management, Therapy and Legal Intervention. London: Routledge.
29.
Genette, G. (1980) Narrative Discourse. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
30.
Gibbons, J. (1994) `Introduction: Language Constructing Law', in J. Gibbon (ed.) Language and the Law, pp. 3-10. London: Longman.
31.
Gilbert, G.N. and Mulkay, M. (1984) Opening Pandora's Box: A Sociological Analysis of Scientists' Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32.
Hacking, I. (1992) `World-Making by Kind-Making: Child Abuse for Example', in M. Douglas and D. Hull (eds) How Classification Works, pp. 180-238. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
33.
Henry, S. and Milanovic, D. (1996) Constitutive Criminology: Beyond Postmodernism. London: Sage.
34.
Jefferson, G. (1984) `At First I Thought': A Normalizing Device for Extraordinary Events. Unpublished manuscript, Katholieke Hogeschool Tilburg.
35.
Jefferson, G. (1990) `List Construction as a Task and Resource', in G. Psathas (ed.) Interaction Competence, pp. 63-92. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
36.
Jenkins, S. (1997) `Sexual Abuse - A Process, Not an Event: A View from Practice', Psychiatry, Psychology and Law4: 65-71.
37.
Kitzinger, C. and Frith, H. (1999) `Just Say No? The Use of Conversation Analysis in Developing a Feminist Perspective on Sexual Refusal', Discourse & Society10: 293-316.
38.
Kitzinger, J. (1997) `Who Are You Kidding? Children, Power and the Struggle Against Sexual Abuse', in A. James and A. Prout (eds) Constructing and Reconstructing Childhood: Contemporary Issues in the Sociological Study of Childhood, pp. 165-189. London: Falmer.
39.
Levinson, S.C. (1988) `Putting Linguistics on a Proper Footing: Explorations in Goffman's Concepts of Participation', in P. Drew and A. Wooten (eds) Erving Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order, pp. 161-227. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
40.
MacMartin, C. (1999) Discursive Constructions of Child Sexual Abuse: Conduct, Credibility and Culpability in Trial Judgments. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
41.
MacMartin, C. and Yarmey, A.D. (1999) `Rhetoric and the Recovered Memory Debate', Canadian Psychology40: 343-358.
42.
MacMillan, K. and Edwards, D. (1999) `Who Killed the Princess? Description and Blame in the British Press', Discourse Studies1: 151-174.
43.
Martin's Annual Criminal Code (1992) Aurora, ON: Canada Law Books.
44.
Mewitt, A.W. and Manning, M. (1994) Mewitt and Manning on Criminal Law (3rd edn). Toronto: Butterworths.
45.
Mitra, C.L. (1987) `Judicial Discourse in Father-Daughter Incest Appeals', International Journal of the Sociology of Law15: 121-216.
46.
Myers, J.E.B. (1996) `A Decade of International Reform to Accommodate Child Witnesses: Steps Toward a Child Witness Code', in B.L. Bottoms and G.S. Goodman (eds) International Perspectives on Child Abuse and Children's Testimony: Psychological Research and Law, pp. 221-265. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
47.
O'Connor, P.E. (1995) `Speaking of Crime: “I Don't Know What Made Me Do It” ', Discourse & Society6: 429-456.
48.
Paciocco, D.M. (1996) `The Evidence of Children: Testing the Rules Against What We Know', Queen's Law Journal21: 345-393.
49.
Painter, S. (1986) `Research on the Prevalence of Child Sexual Abuse: New Directions', Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science18: 323-339.
50.
Philips, S. (1993) `Evidentiary Standards for American Trials: Just the Facts', in J.H. Hill and J.T. Irvine (eds) Responsibility and Evidence in Oral Discourse, pp. 248-259. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
51.
Philips, S.U. (1998) Ideology in the Language of Judges. New York: Oxford University Press.
52.
Pomerantz, A. (1986) `Extreme Case Formulations: A Way of Legitimizing Claims', Human Studies9: 219-229.
53.
Poole, D.A. and Lindsay, D.S. (1998) `Assessing the Accuracy of Young Children's Reports: Lessons from the Investigation of Child Sexual Abuse', Applied and Preventive Psychology7: 1-26.
54.
Potter, J. (1996) Representing Reality: Discourse, Rhetoric and Social Construction. London: Sage.
55.
Potter, J. (1998) `Discursive Social Psychology: From Attitudes to Evaluative Practices', European Review of Social Psychology9: 233-266.
56.
Potter, J. and Wetherell, M. (1987) Discourse and Social Psychology. London: Sage.
57.
Potter, J. and Wetherell, M. (1995) `Discourse Analysis', in J. Smith, R. Harré and L. van Langenhove (eds) Rethinking Methods in Psychology, pp. 80-92. London: Sage.
58.
Potter, J. , Edwards, D. and Wetherell, M. (1993) `A Model of Discourse in Action', American Behavioural Scientist36: 383-401.
59.
Regina v. M.G., 93 C.C.C.3d 347 (Ont. Ct. App. 1994).
60.
Regina v. W.S., 90 C.C.C.3d 242 (Ont. Ct. App. 1994).
61.
Regina v. A.K. and N.K., 137 C.C.C.3d 225 (Ont. Ct. App. 1999).
62.
Renner, K.E. and Yurchesyn, K. (1994) `Sexual Robbery: The Missing Concept in the Search for an Appropriate Legal Metaphor for Sexual Aggression', Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science26: 41-51.
63.
Renner, K.E. , Alksnis, C. and Park, L. (1997) `The Standard of Social Justice as a Research Process', Canadian Psychology38: 91-102.
64.
Rogers, G. and Renshaw, K. (1993) `Covert Communication Between Sex Offenders and Their Child Victims', Annals of Sex Research6: 185-196.
65.
Rogers, R. (1990) Reaching for Solutions. Ottawa: Ministry of Supply and Services Canada.
Sacks, H. (1995) Lectures on Conversation (Vols 1 and 2; G. Jefferson, ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
68.
Sas, L.D. , Wolfe, D.A. and Gowdy, K. (1996) `Children and the Courts in Canada', Criminal Justice and Behavior23: 338-357.
69.
Saunders, E.J. (1986) `Judicial Attitudes Toward Child Sexual Abuse: A Preliminary Investigation', Judicature70(2): 95-98.
70.
Saunders, E.J. (1988) `A Comparative Study of Attitudes Toward Child Sexual Abuse Among Social Workers and Judicial System Personnel', Child Abuse & Neglect12: 83-90.
71.
Schegloff, E.A. (1972) `Notes on a Conversational Practice: Formulating Place', in D. Sudnow (ed.) Studies in Social Interaction, pp. 75-119. New York: Free Press.
72.
Sgroi, S.M. , Blick, L.C. and Porter, F.S. (1982) `A Conceptual Framework for Child Sexual Abuse', in S.M. Sgroi (ed.) Handbook of Clinical Intervention in Child Sexual Abuse, pp. 9-37. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
73.
Singer, M.I. , Hussey, D. and Strom, K.J. (1992) `Grooming the Victim: An Analysis of a Perpetrator's Seduction Letter', Child Abuse & Neglect16: 877-886.
74.
Smart, C. (1986) `Feminism and Law: Some Problems of Analysis and Strategy', International Journal of the Sociology of Law14: 109-123.
75.
Sopinka, J. , Lederman, S.N. and Bryant, A.W. (1992) The Law of Evidence in Canada. Toronto: Butterworths.
76.
Speer, S.A. and Potter, J. (2000) `The Management of Heterosexist Talk: Conversational Resources and Prejudiced Claims', Discourse & Society11: 543-572.
77.
Standing Committee on Justice and the Solicitor General (1993) Four-Year Review of the Child Sexual Abuse Provisions of the Criminal Code and the Canada Evidence Act (Formerly Bill C-15) (Issue No. 101). Ottawa: Supply and Services Canada.
78.
Vidmar, N. (1997) `Generic Prejudice and the Presumption of Guilt in Sexual Abuse Trials', Law and Human Behavior21: 5-25.
79.
Wade, A. (1997) `Small Acts of Living: Everyday Resistance to Violence and Other Forms of Oppression', Contemporary Family Therapy19: 23-39.
80.
Wooffitt, R. (1992) Telling Tales of the Unexpected: The Organization of Factual Discourse. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
81.
Wood, L.A. and Rennie, H. (1994) `Formulating Rape: The Discursive Construction of Victims and Villains', Discourse & Society5: 125-148.
82.
Woolgar, S. (1988) Science: The Very Idea. Chichester: Ellis Horwood; London: Tavistock.
83.
Woolgar, S. and Pawluch, D. (1985) `Ontological Gerrymandering: The Anatomy of Social Problems Explanations', Social Problems32: 214-227.
84.
Young, A.H. (1992) `Child Sexual Abuse and the Law of Evidence: Some Current Canadian Issues', Canadian Journal of Family Law11: 11-40.
