The power relationships and discursive strategies inherent in the interview as a mode of conversation, production and presentation are fundamental conditions for politics in the mediated public sphere. The journalistic interview sets the terms for politicians' public communication and appearances. This article is based on analyses of 124 broadcast news items which included interviews with Swedish politicians. The analyses are inspired by conversation analysis of news interviews. Discourse analysis, particularly the concepts of decontextualization and recontextualization, has also contributed to this study. The results show that it is a widespread practice in television news to divorce answers from the preceding question. In news stories, political interviews are presented in a fragmentary form. This article focuses on four discursive strategies in the recontextualization of interview answers, whereby the original question is removed and substituted by something else. The analyses show how the recontextualization influences the meaning of both the answers and the interviewee's actions and character.
Asp, Kent (1986) Mäktiga massmedier [The powerful mass media]. Stockholm: Akademilitteratur.
2.
Asp, Kent (1990) `Medialisering, medielogik, mediekrati' [Mediatization, media logic and mediarchy], Nordicom Information4: 7-12. Gothenberg: Nordicom.
3.
Asp, Kent and Esaiasson, Peter (1996) `The Modernization of Swedish Campaigns', in D.L. Swanson and P. Mancini (eds) Media and Modern Democracy, pp. 73-90. Westport, CT: Praeger.
4.
Bavelas, Janet B. , Black, Alex, Bryson, Lisa and Mullett, Jennifer (1988) `Political Equivocation: A Situational Explanation', Journal of Language and Social Psychology7(2): 137-145.
5.
Berger, Asa (1997) Narratives in Popular Culture, Media and Everyday Life. London: Sage.
6.
Blumer, Jay G. and Gurevitch, Michael (1995) The Crisis of Public Communication. London: Routledge.
7.
Bull, Peter (1994) `On Identifying Questions, Replies and Nonreplies in Political Interviews', Journal of Language and Social Psychology13(2): 115-132.
8.
Clayman, Steven (1992) `Footing in the Achievement of Neutrality: The Case of News-Interview Discourse', in P. Drew and J. Heritage (eds) Talk at Work, pp. 163-198. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
Clayman, Steven (1995) `Defining Moments, Presidential Debates, and the Dynamics of Quotability', Journal of Communication45(3): 118-146.
10.
Corner, John (1999) Critical Ideas in Television Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11.
Ekström, Mats (2000) `Information, Storytelling and Attractions: TV Journalism in Three Modes of Communication', Media Culture & Society22(4): 465-492.
12.
Ekström, Mats and Eriksson, Göran (1998) Avslöjande journalistik och underhållande dramatik [Revealing journalism and entertaining drama]. Örebro: Örebro University (Studies in Communication and Media 10).
13.
Ekström, Mats and Eriksson, Göran (1999) `Den medialiserade politikens paradoxer: Exempel från den svenska valrörelsen' [The paradoxes of mediatized politics], Nordicom Information21(4): 39-58.
14.
Fairclough, Norman (1995) Media Discourse. London: Edward Arnold.
15.
Fishman, Mark (1980) Manufacturing the News. Austin: University of Texas Press.
16.
Goffman, Erving (1995) Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
17.
Greatbatch, David (1992) `Disagreement between News Interviewees', in P. Drew and J. Heritage (eds) Talk at Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Harris, Sandra (1991) `Evasive Action: How Politicians Respond to Questions in Political Interviews', in P. Scannell (ed.) Broadcast Talk, pp. 76-99. London: Sage.
19.
Heritage, John (1985) `Analyzing News Interviews: Aspects of the Production of Talk for an Overhearing Audience', in T.A. van Dijk (ed.) Discourse and Dialogue, pp. 95-117. London: Academic Press.
20.
Heritage, John (1999) `Question Design', paper presented at the conference `Broadcast Conversation: Interaction in the Media', Roskilde University25-6 March.
21.
Heritage, John and Greatbatch, David (1991) `On the Institutional Character of Institutional Talk: The Case of News Interviews', in D. Boden and D. H. Zimmerman (eds) Talk and Social Structure, pp. 93-137. Cambridge: Polity Press.
22.
Jucker, Andreas H. (1986) News Interviews. Pragmatics & Beyond VII: 4. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
23.
Larsson, Larsåke (1998) Nyheter i samspel: Studier i kommunjournalistik. [News in interaction: reporting local politics]. Gothenberg: Gothenberg University (Studies for Journalism and Mass Communication).
24.
Linell, Per (1990) `The Power of Dialogue Dynamics', in I. Markovà and K. Foppa (eds) The Dynamic of Dialogue, pp. 173-177. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
25.
Linell, Per (1998) Approaching Dialogue: Talk, Interaction, and Contexts in Dialogical Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
26.
Mårtensson, E. (1998) Det vardagliga småpratet i radio: Från trygghet till utmaning [Small talk on the radio: once trivial now provocative]. Stockholm: Stockholm University (Institutionen för journalistik, medier och kommunikation).
27.
Nylund, Mats (2000) Iscensatt Interaktion: Strukturer och strategier i politiska mediesamtal [Staged interaction: Structures and strategies in political conversation in the media]. Helsingfors: Svenska litteratursällskapet.
28.
Sand, Gunnar and Helland, Knut (1998) Bak TV-nyhetene: Produksjon og presentasjon i NRK og TV2 [Behind the TV news: Production and presentation on NRK and TV2]. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
29.
Schrøder, Kim and Phillips, Louise (1999) `Mediatised Politics: Political Discourses and the Media in Contemporary Danish Democracy: A Project Outline', Nordicom Information21(4): 59-70.
30.
Thompson, John B. (1995) The Media and Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
