This article concerns categorizations of Romanies in Czech media. We analysed four television debates which were broadcast in the Czech Republic between 1990 and 1995. All of them concerned Romanies, and Czechs and Romanies participated in each of them. The analytic technique we used was membership categorization analysis (MCA), associated with Sacks (1992), and with contemporary ethnomethodology. Our analysis focused on how descriptions of Romanies were used and warranted, and how the membership categorizations both changed in arguments and resisted change. We found that participants did not simply describe Romanies, they warranted the descriptions and, in doing so, presented some of the descriptions as matters of common knowledge and others as facts. Not all `common knowledge' of Romanies was, however, held in common by both Czechs and Romanies. Czechs know Romanies as those who do not live like normal people, who create problems and commit crimes, but the facts about Romanies as unique people with a valid form of life are only known to Romanies.
Antaki, C. and Leudar, I. (1990) `Claim Backing and other Explanatory Genres in Talk', Language and Social Psychology9: 279-292.
2.
Antaki, C. and Leudar, I. (1992) `Arguing and Explaining in Conversation', European Journal of Social Psychology22: 181-194.
3.
Billig, M. (1985) `Prejudice, Categorization and Particularisation: From a Perceptual to a Rhetorical Approach', European Journal of Social Psychology15: 79-103.
4.
Brewer, J.D. and Yearley, S. (1989) `Stigma and Conversational Competence: A Conversational-Analytic Study of the Mentally Handicapped', Human Studies12: 97-115.
5.
Chomsky, N. (1980) Rules and Representations. New York: Columbia University Press.
6.
Clark, H.H. (1996) Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
Clayman, S.E. (1992) `Footing in the Achievement of Neutrality: The Case of News-interview Discourse', in P. Drew and J. Heritage (eds) Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, pp. 163-198. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Costall, A. and Leudar, I. (1996) Special Issue on Situated Action. Ecological Psychology8.
9.
Drew, P. (1978) `Accusations: The Occasioned Use of Members' Knowledge of Religious Geography in Describing Events', Sociology12: 1-22.
10.
Eglin, P. and Hester, S. (1992) `Category, Predicate and Task: The Pragmatics of Practical Action', Semiotica88: 243-268.
11.
Fodor, J. (1975) The Language of Thought. New York: Crowel.
12.
Gál, E. (1999a) Romové v mad'arském tisku - případ Tura a Kétegyháza (Romanies in the Hungarian Media: On the Affairs in Tura and Kétegyháza). Prague: Department of Linguistics and Finno-Ugric Studies, Charles University.
13.
Gál, E. (1999b) Mediální obraz Rom v mad'arském deníku Új Szó (Images of Romanies in the Hungarian Daily Új Szó). Prague: Department of Linguistics and Finno-Ugric Studies, Charles University.
14.
Goffman, E. (1963 [1986]) Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. London: Penguin.
15.
Hamilton, M. (1976) Fish's Clinical Psychopathology: Signs and Symptoms in Psychiatry. Bristol: Wright and Sons.
16.
Hancock, I. (1997) `Duty and Beauty, Possession and Truth: Lexical Impoverishment as Control', in T. Acton and G. Mundy (eds) Romani Culture and Gypsy Identity, pp. 182-189. Hatfield: University of Hertfordshire Press.
17.
Hester, S. and Eglin, P. (1997) Culture in Action: Studies in Membership Categorization Analysis. Studies in Membership Categorization Analysis. Washington, DC: International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis, University Press of America.
18.
Holšánová, J. and Nekvapil, J. (1995) `Menschen “fünfter” Klasse: Reden über Abwesende in der Alltagskommunikation am Beispiel tschechischsprachiger Daten', in M. Czyzewski, E. Gülich, H. Hausendorf and M Kastner (eds), Nationale Selbst- und Fremdbilder im Gespräch, pp. 145-179. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
19.
Homoláč, J. (1999a) Jedna podoba mediálního diskurzu o Romech - na příkladu zpráv o událostech v Klatovech v únoru 1991 (One Form of the Media Discourse about Romanies: On the Reporting of Klatovy Affair in February 1991). Prague: Department of Linguistics and Finno-Ugric Studies, Charles University.
20.
Homoláč, J. (1999b) Ukázková rasová vražda - psaní o vraždě Tibora Berkiho ve Žd'áru nad Sázavou v květnu 1995 (An Exemplary Racial Murder: Writing about the Murder of Tibor Berki in Žd'ár nad Sázavou in May 1995). Prague: Department of Linguistics and Finno-Ugric Studies, Charles University.
Jayyusi, L. (1984) Categorisation and Moral Order. London: Routledge.
23.
Karhanová, K. (1999) Respekt - jiná podoba mediálního diskursu o Romech (Respekt - A Different Form of the Media Discourse about Romanies). Prague: Department of Linguistics and Finno-Ugric Studies, Charles University.
24.
Leudar, I. (1998) `Who is Martin McGuiness? 1: On Contextualizing Reported Political Talk', in S. Čmejrkováet al. (eds) Dialogue Analysis 6, vol. 2, pp. 217-224. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
25.
Leudar, I. and Antaki, C. (1996) `Discourse Participation, Reported Speech and Research Practices in Social Psychology', Theory and Psychology6 (1): 5-29.
26.
Leudar, I. and Nekvapil, J. (1998) `On the Emergence of Political Identity in the Czech Mass Media: The Case of the Democratic Party of Sudetenland', Czech Sociological Review6: 43-58.
27.
Leudar, I. and Thomas, P. (2000) Voices of Reason, Voices of Insanity. London: Routledge.
28.
Macrae, N. , Milne, A.B. and Bodenhausen, G.V. (1994) `Stereotypes as Energy Saving Devices: A Peek inside the Cognitive Toolbox', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology66: 37-47.
29.
Nekvapil, J. (1996) `Varieties and Levels of Positioning: Troubles of a Romany MP in Czech Political Debate, paper presented to the conference Dialogue in the Heart of Europe, Prague, 17-20 April.
30.
Nekvapil, J. (1997) `O komunikačním překonáváníčesko-německé etnické polarizace' (Surmounting of Czech-German Ethnic Polarisation in Communication), in Prědnášky z XL. běhu LŠSS, pp. 43-57. Praha: Univerzita Karlova.
31.
Nekvapil, J. and Leudar, I. (1998) `Masmediální utváření dialogických sítí a politické identity: případ Demokratické strany Sudety' (Emergence of Dialogical Networks and Political Identity in Mass Media: The Case of Democratic Party of Sudetenland), Slovo a Slovesnost59: 30-52.
32.
Nekvapil, J. and Leudar, I. (2000, forthcoming) `K utváření dialogických sítí v českých masmédiích na po átku roku 1993: spor o migrační zákon' (On the Emergence of Dialogical Networks in Czech Mass Media at the Beginning of 1993: Dispute over Migration Law).
33.
Nekvapil, J. , Gál, E., Homoláč, J., Leudar, I. and Sabatová, A. (1998) `Presentations of Romanies in Mass Media,' In G. Sokolová and O. Šrajerová (eds) Národnostní menšiny a majoritní společnost v České republice a v zemích střední Evropy v 90, letech XX. Století, pp. 265-270. Opava: Slezskýústav Slezského zemského muzea/Praha: Dokumentační a informační středisko Rady Evropy.
34.
Ondrejovič, S. (1999) Médiá na Slovensku o Rómoch - prípad Polichno (How Slovak Media Write about Romanies: The Affair in Polichno). Prague: Department of Linguistics and Finno-Ugric Studies, Charles University.
35.
Quasthoff, U. (1978) `The Uses of Stereotype in Everyday Argument', Journal of Pragmatics2: 1-48.
36.
Šabatová, A. (1999) Smrt Tibora Danihela - Zločin a trest aneb je trestné topit Roma? (Death of Tibor Danihel: Crime and Punishment or is it Punishable to Drown a Romany?). Prague: Department of Linguistics and Finno-Ugric Studies, Charles University.
37.
Sacks, H. (1979) `Hotrodder: A Revolutionary Category', in G. Psathas (ed.) Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, pp. 7-14. New York, Irvington.
38.
Sacks, H. (1992) Lectures on Conversation. Cambridge, MA and Oxford: Blackwell.
39.
Stangor, C.G. (1995) `Stereotyping', in A.S.R. Manstead and M. Hewston (eds) Blackwell Encyclopaedia of Social Psychology, pp. 628-633. Oxford: Blackwell.
40.
Watson, D.R. (1983) `The Presentation of “Victim” and “Motive” in Discourse: The Case of Police Interrogations and Interviews', Victimology: An International Journal8: 31-52.
41.
Watson, D.R. (1987) `Interdisciplinary Considerations in the Analysis of Pro-terms', in G.R. Button and J.R.E. Lee (eds) Talk and Social Organisation, pp. 261-289. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Publishers.
42.
Watson, D.R. (1995) `Angoisse dans la 42e Rue', in P. Paperman and R. Ogien (eds) La couleur des pensees, pp. 197-216. Paris: Éditions de l'École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales.
43.
Widdicombe, S. (1998) ` “But you Don't Class Yourself” ': The Interactional Management of Category Membership and Non-membership', in C. Antaki and S. Widdicombe (eds) Identities in Talk, pp. 52-70. London: Sage.
