Design and evaluation of a mixed mode solar dryer that consumes less energy is the primary goal of this study. In the solar dryer curing cupboard, heated air from an absorber plate gathers solar energy as warm air passes through a pan. In order to maintain temperature and humidity during the drying process, the cotton industry consumes a lot of energy. This study evaluates four different mathematical model derived from the initial assessment of the cabinet photovoltaic dryer’s forced transmission. A variety of observations are observed, and the models are assessed using EMD, RMSE, R2 and 2 parameters. The mass flow rate 0.15 kg/s was considered for this experimental work. Among all the four models Wang and Singh model exhibited adequate fit of data with experimental results. Response surface methodology (RSM) uses time, temperature, and solar radiation as input factors to calculate output parameters including thermal efficiency and moisture content. Present works performed RSM studies at three different time durations of a day. The outcome of RSM study indicates the influencing input parameters exhibited positive, negative, and linear relationship with moisture content and thermal efficiency.
MadhankumarSViswanathanKTaipabuMI, et al.A review on the latest developments in solar dryer technologies for food drying process. Sustain Energy Technol Assessments2023; 58: 103298.
2.
RulaziELMarwaJKichongeB, et al.Development and performance evaluation of a novel solar dryer integrated with thermal energy storage system for drying of agricultural products. ACS Omega2023; 8(45): 43304–43317.
3.
VillagranEEspitiaJJVelázquezFA, et al.Solar dryers: technical insights and bibliometric trends in energy technologies. AgriEngineering2024; 6(4): 4041–4063.
4.
KumarSGhritlahreHKAgrawalS, et al.An experimental investigation of active mixed-mode solar dryer utilizing north wall reflector. Energy Sources, Part A Recovery, Util Environ Eff2024; 46(1): 16813–16835.
5.
HegdeVNHosurVSRathodSK, et al.Design, fabrication and performance evaluation of solar dryer for banana. Energy Sustain Soc2015; 5: 12–23.
6.
ElwakeelAEWapetDEMMahmoudWAEM, et al.Design and implementation of a pv‐integrated solar dryer based on internet of things and date fruit quality monitoring and control. Int J Energy Res2023; 2023(1): 1–17.
7.
NirokaPPanprayunGPeerakiatkhajohnP. Performance of a solar greenhouse dryer for water hyacinth. Int Energy J2022; 22(2): 167–176.
8.
PalAAJrALA. Quality profile of different vegetables dried using simple solar dryers. Int J Postharvest Technol Innovation2022; 8(4): 313–327.
9.
ToshniwalUKaraleSR. A review paper on solar dryer. Int J Eng Res Afr2013; 3(2): 896–902.
10.
QualityJOF. Retracted: design and fabrication of solar dryer system for food preservation of vegetables or fruit. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2023.
11.
Abdul RazakATarminziMASMAzmiMAA, et al.Recent advances in solar drying system: a review. International Journal of Engineering Technology and Sciences2021; 8(1): 1–13.
12.
El-SebaiiAAShalabySM. Solar drying of agricultural products: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2012; 16(1): 37–43.
13.
BolajiBOOlalusiAP. Performance evaluation of a mixed-mode solar dryer. AU Journal of Technology2008; 11(4): 225–231.
14.
SubbianVThirupathieswaranRMurugavelK. Experimental investigation and neural network prediction of the performance of a mixed mode solar dryer for coconut. Journal of Advances in chemistry2016; 12(25): 5635–5644.
15.
SubbianVMurugavelKK. Computational fluid dynamics based experimental analysis of solar tunnel dryer for tapioca using aluminium and copper absorber plate. J Comput Theor Nanosci2017; 14(7): 3405–3409.
16.
SubbianVSiva KumarSChaithanyaK, et al.Optimization of solar tunnel dryer for mango slice using response surface methodology. Mater Today Proc2021; 46: 7844–7847.
17.
YuanGHongLLiX, et al.Experimental investigation of a solar dryer system for drying carpet. Energy Proc2015; 70: 626–633.
18.
RawatPSherwaniAF. Annual assessment of solar air-drying system integrated with photovoltaic and phase change material for cost-effective and efficient productions. Dry Technol2025; 43(5): 878–908.
19.
XiZYangDDanW, et al.Investigation of texturization for monocrystalline silicon solar cells with different kinds of alkaline. Renew Energy2004; 29(13): 2101–2107.
20.
OnuCEK IgbokwePT NwabanneJ, et al.Evaluation of optimization techniques in predicting optimum moisture content reduction in drying potato slices. Artificial intelligence in Agriculture2020; 4: 39–47.
21.
O’CallaghanJRMenziesDJBaileyPH. Digital simulation of agricultural dryer performance. J Agric Eng Res1971; 16(3): 223–244.
22.
HacıhafızoğluOCihanAKahveciK. Mathematical modelling of drying of thin layer rough rice. Food Bioprod Process2008; 86(4): 268–275.
23.
ChhinmanMS. Evaluation of selected mathematical models for describing thin layer drying of in-shell pecans. Trans ASAE (Am Soc Agric Eng)1984; 27: 610–615.
24.
WangCYSinghRP, 1978. A single layer drying equation for rough rice. Newark, DE: Science and Education Publishing.
25.
ZhangQLitchfieldJB. An optimization of intermittent corn drying in a laboratory scale thin layer dryer. Dry Technol1991; 9(2): 383–395.
26.
BoxGEWilsonKB. On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions. Breakthroughs in statistics: methodology and distribution. New York, NY: Springer New York, 1992, pp. 270–310.
27.
JekelCFHaftkaRTVenterG, et al.Lack-of-fit tests to indicate material model improvement or experimental data noise reduction. 2018 AIAA Non-Deterministic Approaches Conference, Kissimmee, FL, USA, 8–12 January, 2018.
28.
KraberS, 2022. Understanding lack of fit: when to worry.
29.
ThirumalaikumarasamyDShanmugamKBalasubramanianV. Influences of atmospheric plasma spraying parameters on the porosity level of alumina coating on AZ31B magnesium alloy using response surface methodology. Prog Nat Sci Mater Int2012; 22(5): 468–479.
30.
HuXGuoLWangJ, et al.Computational fluid dynamics and machine learning integration for evaluating solar thermal collector efficiency-based parameter analysis. Sci Rep2025; 15(1): 24528.
31.
SinuhajiTRFSuhermanSHadiyantoH, et al.Evaluation and comparison of drying models in open sun drying and photovoltaic and LPG burner assisted hybrid solar drying system. Case Stud Chem Environ Eng2025; 11: 101104.
32.
IranshahiKOnwudeDIRubinettiD, et al.Scalable electrohydrodynamic drying configuration for dehydrating biological materials at industrial scale. Augsburg: Man Energy Solutions, 2022.
33.
VooraVBermudezSFarrellJJ, et al.Cotton prices and sustainability. Winnipeg, MB: International Institute for Sustainable Development, 2023, pp. 1–37.
34.
McGarryRCAyreBG. Cotton architecture: examining the roles of SINGLE FLOWER TRUSS and SELF-PRUNING in regulating growth habits of a woody perennial crop. Curr Opin Plant Biol2021; 59: 101968.
35.
ChengS. Techno-economic analysis for the costs of drying chickpeas: an example showing the trade-off between capital and operating costs for different inlet air temperatures. Processes2025; 13(4): 1178.
