This study focuses on investigating a PCM based TES unit, which plays a crucial role in temporarily storing thermal energy to mitigate the mismatch between energy supply and demand. Visual inspection confirmed the addition of rGO, with significant increase in the thermal conductivity (∼62%) of PW. The study examined the effects of rGO concentration (0.25-1.00 vol%) and HTF flow rate on TC and TDC of TES. Higher rGO concentration reduced both TC and TDC time due to enhanced heat transfer. Increasing the flow rate from 0.375 to 1.5 L/min decreased overall thermal charging time, with improved efficiency (∼24). The results show a direct correlation between TC, TDC, efficiency, and process parameters (rGO concentration and flow rate), with experimental and predicted values demonstrating satisfactory agreement (±12%, ±12%, and ±2%, respectively). This study provides a practical application and a valuable predictive tool for estimating TC, TDC, and thermal efficiency based on known flow rates and concentrations of rGO in wax-based PCMs, suggesting rGO as an effective additive.
GuangulFMChalaGT. Solar energy as renewable energy source: SWOT analysis. 2019 4th MEC International Conference on Big Data and Smart City (ICBDSC). Muscat, Oman, 2019, pp. 1–5 DOI: 10.1109/ICBDSC.2019.8645580.
2.
CabezaLFMartorellIMiróL, et al.1 - Introduction to thermal energy storage systems. In: CabezaLF (ed). Advances in Thermal Energy Storage Systems. 2nd ed.Woodhead Publishing, 2021, pp. 1–33.
3.
MahdiMSHasanAFMahoodHB, et al.Numerical study and experimental validation of the effects of orientation and configuration on melting in a latent heat thermal storage unit. J Energy Storage2019; 23: 456–468. DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2019.04.013.
4.
EmeemaJMuraliGReddiBV, et al.Investigations on paraffin wax/CQD composite phase change material - improved latent heat and thermal stability. J Energy Storage2024; 85: 111056. DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2024.111056.
5.
ZhangQWangHLingZ, et al.RT100/expand graphite composite phase change material with excellent structure stability, photo-thermal performance and good thermal reliability. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells2015; 140: 158–166. DOI: 10.1016/j.solmat.2015.04.008.
6.
ChengPChenXGaoH, et al.Different dimensional nanoadditives for thermal conductivity enhancement of phase change materials: Fundamentals and applications. Nano Energy2021; 85: 105948. DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.105948.
7.
LiCXieBChenD, et al.Ultrathin graphite sheets stabilized stearic acid as a composite phase change material for thermal energy storage. Energy2019; 166: 246–255. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.10.082.
8.
FikriMAPandeyAKSamykanoM, et al.Thermal conductivity, reliability, and stability assessment of phase change material (PCM) doped with functionalized multi-wall carbon nanotubes (FMWCNTs). J Energy Storage2022; 50: 104676. DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2022.104676.
9.
DongSS Al-ZahraniKA RedaS, et al.Investigation of thermal performance of a shell and tube latent heat thermal energy storage tank in the presence of different nano-enhanced PCMs. Case Stud Therm Eng2022; 37: 102280. DOI: 10.1016/j.csite.2022.102280.
10.
RashidFLKhalafAFAlizadehA, et al.Numerical investigation of the effect of the number of fins on the phase-change material melting inside a shell-and-tube cylindrical thermal energy storage. Case Stud Therm Eng2024; 60: 104754. DOI: 10.1016/j.csite.2024.104754.
11.
LiJDuanWPengZ, et al.An experimental and numerical study on the energy storage and release performance of shell and tube heat exchangers with phase change material for the data center. Appl Therm Eng2024; 255: 123966. DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2024.123966.
12.
Al-AmayrehMIAlahmerA. Efficiency enhancement in direct thermal energy storage systems using dual phase change materials and nanoparticle additives. Case Stud Therm Eng2024; 59: 104577. DOI: 10.1016/j.csite.2024.104577.
13.
LiangKShiLZhangJ, et al.Fabrication of shape-stable composite phase change materials based on lauric acid and graphene/graphene oxide complex aerogels for enhancement of thermal energy storage and electrical conduction. Thermochim Acta2018; 664: 1–15. DOI: 10.1016/j.tca.2018.04.002.
14.
SathishkumarACheralathanM. Charging and discharging processes of low capacity nano-PCM based cool thermal energy storage system: an experimental study. Energy2023; 263: 125700. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.125700.
15.
PássaroJRebolaACoelhoL, et al.Effect of fins and nanoparticles in the discharge performance of PCM thermal storage system with a multi pass finned tube heat exchange. Appl Therm Eng2022; 212: 118569. DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2022.118569.
16.
ChoureBKAlamTKumarR. A review on heat transfer enhancement techniques for PCM based thermal energy storage system. J Energy Storage2023; 72: 108161. DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2023.108161.
17.
BuonomoBRita GoliaMMancaO, et al.A review on thermal energy storage with phase change materials enhanced by metal foams. Therm Sci Eng Prog2024; 53: 102732. DOI: 10.1016/j.tsep.2024.102732.
18.
Al-SalamiHADhaidanNSAbbasHH, et al.Review of PCM charging in latent heat thermal energy storage systems with fins. Therm Sci Eng Prog2024; 51: 102640. DOI: 10.1016/j.tsep.2024.102640.
19.
DiarceGCampos-CeladorÁSalaJM, et al.A novel correlation for the direct determination of the discharging time of plate-based latent heat thermal energy storage systems. Appl Therm Eng2018; 129: 521–534. DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.10.057.
20.
XuYZhengZ-JLiM-J. A half-analytical correlation of total melting time for shell-and-tube latent-heat thermal energy storage unit. Appl Therm Eng2019; 161: 114176. DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.114176.
21.
MekrisuhKUSinghDUdayraj. Performance analysis of a vertically oriented concentric-tube PCM based thermal energy storage system: Parametric study and correlation development. Renew Energy2020; 149: 902–916. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.10.074.
22.
GautamASainiRP. Retracted: development of correlations for Nusselt number and friction factor of packed bed solar thermal energy storage system having spheres with pores as packing elements. J Energy Storage2021; 36: 102362. DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2021.102362.
23.
LiuYYuKYangY, et al.Size effects of nano-rutile TiO2 on latent heat recovered of binary eutectic hydrate salt phase change material. Thermochim Acta2020; 684: 178492. DOI: 10.1016/j.tca.2019.178492.
24.
KalidasanBPandeyAKRahmanS, et al.Experimental investigation of graphene Nanoplatelets enhanced low temperature Ternary eutectic salt hydrate phase change material. Energies2023; 16: 1574. DOI: 10.3390/en16041574.
25.
KalidasanBPandeyAKRahmanS, et al.Graphene–silver hybrid nanoparticle based organic phase change materials for enhanced thermal energy storage. Sustainability2022; 14: 13240. DOI: 10.3390/su142013240.
26.
JiangYLiuMSunY. Review on the development of high temperature phase change material composites for solar thermal energy storage. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells2019; 203: 110164. DOI: 10.1016/j.solmat.2019.110164.
27.
SoomroSGulINaseerH, et al.Improved performance of CuFe2O4/rGO nanohybrid as an anode material for lithium-ion batteries prepared via facile one-step method. Curr Nanosci2018; 15: 420–429. DOI: 10.2174/1573413714666181115122016.
28.
GuptaAMittalMSinghMK, et al.Low temperature synthesis of NbC/C nano-composites as visible light photoactive catalyst. Sci Rep2018; 8: 13597. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-31989-z.
29.
SuyitnoBMRahmalinaDRahmanRA. Increasing the charge/discharge rate for phase-change materials by forming hybrid composite paraffin/ash for an effective thermal energy storage system. AIMS Mater Sci2023; 10: 70–85. DOI: 10.3934/matersci.2023005.
30.
LuoYXiongSHuangJ, et al.Preparation, characterization and performance of paraffin/sepiolite composites as novel shape-stabilized phase change materials for thermal energy storage. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells2021; 231: 111300. DOI: 10.1016/j.solmat.2021.111300.
31.
SuYWangJLiuH. FTIR spectroscopic study on effects of temperature and polymer composition on the structural properties of PEO−PPO−PEO block copolymer micelles. Langmuir2002; 18: 5370–5374. DOI: 10.1021/la020007p.
32.
MemonSALoTYBarbhuiyaSA, et al.Development of form-stable composite phase change material by incorporation of dodecyl alcohol into ground granulated blast furnace slag. Energy Build2013; 62: 360–367. DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.03.026.
33.
MianSAColleyHEThornhillMH, et al.Development of a dewaxing protocol for tissue-engineered models of the oral mucosa used for raman spectroscopic analysis. Appl Spectrosc Rev2014; 49: 614–617. DOI: 10.1080/05704928.2014.882348.
34.
HosseiniMJRahimiMBahrampouryR. Experimental and computational evolution of a shell and tube heat exchanger as a PCM thermal storage system. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf2014; 50: 128–136. DOI: 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2013.11.008.
35.
AliMAFayazVRFViegasRF, et al.Enhancement of heat transfer in paraffin wax PCM using nano graphene composite for industrial helmets. J Energy Storage2019; 26: 100982. DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2019.100982.
36.
ZouDLiuXHeR, et al.High thermal response rate and super low supercooling degree microencapsulated phase change materials (MEPCM) developed by optimizing shell with various nanoparticles. Int J Heat Mass Transf2019; 140: 956–964. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.06.057.
37.
WarzohaRJFleischerAS. Effect of carbon nanotube interfacial geometry on thermal transport in solid–liquid phase change materials. Appl Energy2015; 154: 271–276. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.04.121.
38.
VivekananthanMAmirthamVA. Characterisation and thermophysical properties of graphene nanoparticles dispersed erythritol PCM for medium temperature thermal energy storage applications. Thermochim Acta2019; 676: 94–103. DOI: 10.1016/j.tca.2019.03.037.
39.
Al-WaeliAHASopianKChaichanMT, et al.Evaluation of the nanofluid and nano-PCM based photovoltaic thermal (PVT) system: an experimental study. Energy Convers Manag2017; 151: 693–708. DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2017.09.032.
40.
VenkitarajKPSureshS. Effects of Al2O3, CuO and TiO2 nanoparticles son thermal, phase transition and crystallization properties of solid-solid phase change material. Mech Mater2019; 128: 64–88. DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmat.2018.10.004.
41.
AliAHIbrahimSIJawadQA, et al.Effect of nanomaterial addition on the thermophysical properties of Iraqi paraffin wax. Case Stud Therm Eng2019; 15: 100537. DOI: 10.1016/j.csite.2019.100537.
42.
LeongKYHasbiSKu AhmadKZ, et al.Thermal properties evaluation of paraffin wax enhanced with carbon nanotubes as latent heat thermal energy storage. J Energy Storage2022; 52: 105027. DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2022.105027.
43.
HashempourSVakiliMH. Preparation and characterisation of nano enhanced phase change material by adding carbon nano tubes to butyl stearate. J Exp Nanosci2018; 13: 188–198. DOI: 10.1080/17458080.2018.1502480.
