Influence of external modulation on unsteady flow and heat transfer near the leading edge of a constant thickness aerofoil has been described through large eddy simulation. This is a simplified approach to study film cooling activities near the leading edge of a turbine blade. Discrete jets, which are forced at a Strouhal number (St) of 0.37 with an averaged blowing ratio of unity, are ejected normally from a series of film cooling holes to a separated boundary layer. The results are compared against the corresponding steady injection. Larger coherent structures appear for a forced jet with an augmented vortex dynamics resulting in high jet lift-off, earlier break down, enhanced mixing with the cross flow and dilution of coolant layer. Resolved hairpins, which are the signature of coherent structures, illustrate that the vorticity and thermal field are highly correlated. Furthermore, evolution of hairpins and their advection control scalar transport and mixing. In brief, the modulation of coolant jet near the leading edge appears not beneficial for the combination of blowing ratio and frequency considered here.
SinhaAKBogardDGCrawfordME. Film cooling effectiveness downstream of a single row of holes with variable density ratio. ASME J Turbomach1991; 113: 442–449.
2.
TakeishiKAokiSSatoT, et al.Film cooling on a gas turbine rotor blade. ASME J Turbomach1992; 114: 828–834.
3.
BunkerRS. A review of shaped hole turbine film cooling technology. J Heat Transfer2005; 127: 441–453.
BogardDTholeK. Gas turbine film cooling. J Propul Power2006; 22: 249–270.
6.
YaoJYaoYF. Computational study of hole shape effect on film cooling performance. Proc IMechE, Part A: J Power and Energy2011; 225: 505–519.
7.
AcharyaSKananiY. Advances in film cooling heat transfer. Adv Heat Transf2017; 49: 91–156.
8.
KohliABogardDG. Effects of very high free-stream turbulence on the jet–mainstream interaction in a film cooling flow. ASME J Turbomach1998; 120: 785–790.
9.
SaumweberCSchulzAWittingS. Free stream turbulence effects on film cooling with shaped holes. ASME J Turbomach2003; 15: 65–73.
10.
WomackKMSchultzMPVolinoRJ. Measurements in film cooling flows with periodic wakes. ASME J Turbomach2008; 130: 041008–041008.
11.
CoulthardSVolinoRJFlackKA. Effect of jet pulsing on film cooling. Part I: effectiveness and flowfield temperature results. ASME J Turbomach2007; 129: 232–246.
12.
CoulthardSVolinoRJFlackKA. Effect of jet pulsing on film cooling. Part II: heat transfer results. ASME J Turbomach2007; 129: 247–257.
13.
EkkadSVOuSRivirRB. Effect of jet pulsation and duty cycle on film cooling from a single jet on a leading edge model. ASME J Turbomach2006; 128: 564–571.
14.
RutledgeJLKingPIRivirRB. Influence of film cooling unsteadiness on turbine blade leading edge heat flux. ASME J Eng Gas Turbine Power2012; 134: 071901–071901.
15.
MuldoonFAcharyaS. DNS study of pulsed film cooling for enhanced cooling effectiveness. Int J Heat Mass Transf2009; 52: 3118–3127.
16.
SarkarSBabuH. Large eddy simulation on the interactions of wake and film-cooling near a leading edge. ASME J Turbomach2015; 137: 011005–011005.
17.
LiGYuJChenF, et al.Large eddy simulation of saw tooth plasma actuator for improving film cooling efficiency. Proc IMechE, Part A: J Power and Energy2017; 231: 357–370.
18.
FricTRoshkoA. Vortical structure in the wake of a transverse jet. J Fluid Mech1994; 279: 1–47.
19.
KelsoRMLimTPerryAE. An experimental study of round jets in cross-flow. J Fluid Mech1996; 306: 111–144.
20.
SmithSMungalM. Mixing structure and scaling of the jet in crossflow. J Fluid Mech1998; 357: 83–122.
21.
PetersonSPlesniakM. Evolution of jets emanating from short holes into crossflow. J Fluid Mech2004; 503: 57–91.
22.
BidanGNikitopoulosDE. On steady and pulsed low-blowing-ratio transverse jets. J Fluid Mech2013; 714: 393–433.
23.
DaiCJiaLZhangJ, et al.On the flow structure of an inclined jet in crossflow at low velocity ratios. Int J Heat Fluid Flow2016; 58: 11–18.
24.
HavenBAKurosakaM. Kidney and anti-kidney vortices in crossflow jets. J Fluid Mech1997; 352: 27–64.
25.
NewTHLimTTLuoSC. Elliptic jets in cross-flow. J Fluid Mech2003; 494: 119–140.
26.
GuoXSchröderWMeinkeM. Large-eddy simulations of film cooling flows. Comput Fluid2006; 35: 587–606.
27.
SarkarSBoseTK. Comparison of different turbulence models for prediction of slot film cooling: flow and temperature field. J Numer Heat Transf B1995; 28: 217–238.
28.
HodaAAcharyaS. Predictions of a film coolant jet in crossflow with different turbulence models. ASME J Turbomach2000; 122: 558–569.
29.
WaltersDLeylekJ. A detailed analysis of film-cooling physics: part I: streamwise injection with cylindrical holes. ASME J Turbomach2000; 122: 102–112.
30.
SarkarSDasKBasuD. Film cooling on turbine guide vane: a numerical analysis with multigrid. Proc IMechE, Part A: J Power and Energy2001; 215: 39–53.
31.
AzziAAbidatMJubranBA, et al.Film cooling predictions of simple and compounded angle injection from one and two staggered rows. Numer Heat Transfer A2001; 40: 273–294.
32.
MontisMCiorciariRSalvadoriS, et al.Numerical prediction of cooling losses in a high-pressure gas turbine airfoil. Proc IMechE, Part A: J Power and Energy2014; 228: 903–923.
33.
MedicGDurbinPA. Towards improved prediction of heat transfer on turbine blades. ASME J Turbomach2002; 124: 187–192.
34.
MedicGDurbinPA. Towards improved film cooling prediction. ASME J Turbomach2002; 124: 193–199.
35.
TyagiMAcharyaS. Large eddy simulation of film cooling flow from an inclined cylindrical jet. ASME J Turbomach2003; 125: 734–742.
36.
RenzePSchroderWMeinkeM. Large-eddy simulation of film cooling flows at density gradients. Int J Heat Fluid Flow2008; 29: 18–34.
37.
RozatiATaftiDK. Large-eddy simulations of leading edge film cooling: analysis of flow structures, effectiveness, and heat transfer coefficient. Int J Heat Fluid Flow2008; 29: 1–17.
38.
ZiefleJKleiserL. Assessment of a film-cooling flow structure by large-eddy simulation. J Turbulence2008, pp. 9: 1–25–9: 1–25.
39.
KonopkaMJessenWMeinkeM, et al.Large eddy simulation of film cooling in an adverse pressure gradient flow. ASME J Turbomach2013; 135: 031031–031031.
40.
YangZVokePR. Large-eddy simulation of boundary-layer separation and transition at a change of surface curvature. J Fluid Mech2001; 439: 305–333.
41.
SamsonASarkarS. Effects of free-stream turbulence on transition of a separated shear layer over the leading-edge of a constant thickness aerofoil. ASME J Fluids Eng2016; 138: 021202–19.
42.
SarkarSBabuHSadiqueJ. Interactions of separation bubble with oncoming wakes by LES. ASME J Heat Transfer2016; 138: 021703–12.
43.
ChowdhuryNHKQureshiSAZhangM, et al.Influence of turbine blade leading edge shape on film cooling with cylindrical holes. Int J Heat Mass Transfer2017; 115: 895–908.
LillyDK. A proposed modification of the Germano subgrid-scale closure method. Phys Fluids A1991; 4: 633–635.
46.
FadlunEAVerziccoROrlandiP, et al.Combined immersed-boundary finite-difference methods for three-dimensional complex flow simulations. J Comput Phys2000; 161: 35–60.
47.
KimJChoiH. An immersed-boundary finite-volume method for simulation of heat transfer in complex geometries. KSME Int J2004; 18: 1026–1035.
48.
MuldoonFAcharyaS. A divergence-free interpolation scheme for the immersed boundary method. Int J Numer Meth Fluid2008; 56: 1845–1884.
49.
OrlanskiI. A simple boundary condition for unbounded hyperbolic flows. J Comput Phys1976; 21: 251–269.
50.
Coupland J and Brierley D. Transition in turbomachinery flows. Final report BRITE/EURAM Project AERO-CT92-0050, 1996.
51.
TaftiDKVankaSP. A three-dimensional numerical study of flow separation and reattachment on a blunt plate. Phys Fluids A1991; 3: 2887–2909.
52.
YuenCMartinez-BotasR. Film cooling characteristics of a single round hole at various streamwise angles in a crossflow: part I: effectiveness. Int J Heat Mass Transfer2003; 46: 221–235.
53.
SarkarSVokePR. Large-eddy simulation of unsteady surface pressure over a low-pressure turbine blade due to interactions of passing wakes and inflexional boundary layer. ASME J Turbomach2006; 128: 221–231.
54.
SarkarS. Effects of passing wakes on a separating boundary layer along a low-pressure turbine blade through large-eddy simulation. Proc IMechE, Part A: J Power and Energy2007; 221: 551–564.
55.
SarkarS. Identification of flow structures on a LP turbine blade due to periodic passing wakes. ASME J Fluids Eng2008; 130: 061103–061103.
56.
SarkarS. Influence of wake structure on unsteady flow in a low pressure turbine blade passage. ASME J Turbomach2009; 131: 041016–041016.
57.
SarkarSSarkarS. Large-eddy simulation of wake and boundary layer interactions behind a circular cylinder. ASME J Fluids Eng2009; 131: 091201–091201.
58.
SarkarSSarkarS. Vortex dynamics of a cylinder wake in proximity to a wall. J Fluids Struct2010; 26: 19–40.
59.
SoutherlandKFrederiksenRDahmWJ, et al.Comparisons of mixing in chaotic and turbulent flows. Chaos Solitons Fractals1994; 4: 1057–1089.
