Aerodynamic performance and flow characteristics analysis of Tesla turbines with different nozzle and outlet geometries

Abstract

The aerodynamic performance and flow characteristics of a multichannel nozzled Tesla turbine were investigated numerically with different nozzle and outlet geometries at different rotational speeds. Two kinds of nozzle geometries were proposed: one nozzle channel to one disc channel (named as one-to-one turbine) and one nozzle channel to several disc channels (named as one-to-many turbine). Simplified radial outlet and real axial outlet geometries of the Tesla turbines were adopted to research the influence of outlet geometries. The results show that compared with the one-to-many turbine, the isentropic efficiency of the one-to-one turbine is much higher; while the flow coefficient is much lower. In addition, in the middle disc channels (DC1 and DC2) of which two walls are rotating disc walls, the flow fields are almost the same, but different from that in the side channel (DC3) of which one wall is a rotating wall and the other one is a stationary casing wall. DC1 and DC2 generate more torque with less working fluid, thus the disc spacing distance of DC3 should be narrower than that of DC1 and DC2. Compared to the one-to-many turbine, the working fluid flowing through DC1 and DC2 of the one-to-one turbine is much less, and the flow path lines are much longer. The results of different turbine outlet geometries show that compared with the turbines with radial outlet, the isentropic efficiency of the one-to-many turbine with axial outlet is a little higher, while that of the one-to-one turbine with axial outlet is lower. This is due to the larger torque on the disc hole walls, despite a lot more total pressure loss in the exhaust vent of the one-to-many turbine. Therefore, the contribution of disc hole walls to torque cannot be neglected in numerical simulations.

Keywords

Tesla turbine nozzle outlet aerodynamic performance flow characteristics

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Tesla N. Turbine. US Patent 1 061 206, 1913.

Deng QH, Qi WJ and Feng ZP. Improvement of a theoretical analysis method for Tesla turbines. In: ASME conference on turbomachinery technical conference and exposition, San Antonio, TX, USA, 3–7 June 2013, paper no. GT2013-95425.

Hoya

Guha

. The design of a test rig and study of the performance and efficiency of a Tesla disc turbine. Proc IMechE, Part A: J Power and Energy 2009; 223: 451–465.

Epstein

. Millimeter-scale, micro-electro-mechanical-systems gas turbine engines. ASME Trans J Eng Gas Turbines Power 2004; 126: 205–226.

Lemma

Deam

Toncich

et al.

Characterisation of a small viscous flow turbine. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 2008; 33: 96–105.

Carey

. Assessment of Tesla turbine performance for small scale Rankine combined heat and power systems. ASME Trans J Eng Gas Turbines Power 2010; 132: 122301–1-8.

Sengupta

Guha

. A theory of Tesla disc turbines. Proc IMechE, Part A: J Power and Energy 2012; 226: 650–663.

Guha

Sengupta

. The fluid dynamics of the rotating flow in a Tesla disc turbine. Eur J Mech B/Fluid 2013; 37: 112–123.

Sengupta

Guha

. Analytical and computational solutions for three-dimensional flow-field and relative pathlines for the rotating flow in a Tesla disc turbine. Comput Fluids 2013; 88: 344–353.

10.

Lampart

Jedrzejewski

. Investigations of aerodynamics of Tesla bladeless microturbines. J Theory Appl Mech-Pol 2011; 49: 477–499.

11.

Lampart P and Kosowski K. Design analysis of Tesla microturbine operating on a low-boiling medium. Pol Marit Res 2009; Special issue, pp. 28–33.

12.

Qi WJ, Deng QH, Feng ZP, et al. Influence of disc spacing distance on the aerodynamic performance and flow field of Tesla turbines. In: ASME conference on turbomachinery technical conference and exposition, Seoul, South Korea, 13–17 June 2016, paper no. GT2016-57971.

13.

Guha

Smiley

. Experiment and analysis for an improved design of the inlet and nozzle in Tesla disc turbines. Proc IMechE, Part A: J Power and Energy 2010; 224: 261–277.

14.

Beans

. Investigation into the performance characteristics of a friction turbine. J Spacecraft 1966; 3: 131–134.

15.

Rice

. An analytical and experimental investigation of multiple-disk turbines. ASME Trans J Eng Power 1965; 87: 29–36.

16.

Deam

Lemma

Mace

et al.

On scaling down turbines to millimeter size. ASME Trans J Eng Gas Turbines Power 2008; 130: 052301–1-9.

17.

Guha

Sengupta

. Similitude and scaling laws for the rotating flow between concentric discs. Proc IMechE, Part A: J Power and Energy 2014; 228: 429–439.

18.

Hidema T, Okamoto K, Teramoto S, et al. Numerical investigation of inlet effects on Tesla turbine performance. In: Asian joint conference on propulsion and power, Miyazaki, Japan, 4–6 March 2010, paper no. AJCPP2010-080.

19.

Schosser

Lecheler

Pfitzner

. Analytical and numerical solutions of the rotor flow in Tesla turbines. Period Polytech-Mech Eng 2017; 61: 12–22.

20.

Siddiqui MS, Ahmed H and Ahmed S. Numerical simulation of a compressed air driven Tesla turbine. In: ASME conference on power, Baltimore, MD, USA, 28–31 July 2014, paper no. POWER2014-32069.

21.

Romanin VD, Krishnan VG, Carey VP, et al. Experimental and analytical study of sub-watt scale Tesla turbine performance. In: ASME conference on international mechanical engineering congress and exposition, Texas, USA, 9–15 September 2012, paper no. IMECE2012-89675.