Assessment of curvature correction and reattachment modification into the shear stress transport model within the subsonic axial compressor simulations

Abstract

Complicated flows featuring with highly three-dimensionality and intense rotation/curvature in turbomachines have made the steady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) simulation very difficult. In this paper, based on the widely used ω-based shear stress transport (SST) model, two modifications (one is denoted as shear stress transport model with curvature correction (SST-CC), the other is denoted as shear stress transport model with reattachment modification (SST-RM)) are assessed in predicting the tip leakage flow in the rotor passage and the three-dimensional separating flow in the stator passage of a low-speed axial compressor. Based on the comprehensive experimental data, including the compressor characteristics lines, inter-blade-row velocity profiles, and also detailed three-dimensional flows inside both rotor and stator passages, the abilities for capturing both compressor performance characteristics and specific flow details for simulations with different turbulence models were analyzed. The results indicate that the SST-CC model could simulate an approximate operating line with the one simulated by the SST model, which is very close to the experimental results, while the SST-RM model over-predicted the compressor pressure rise characteristics at all mass-flow-rate conditions. For the tip leakage flow inside the rotor passage and the three-dimensional separating flow inside the stator passage, the SST-RM model predicts a more accurate result, while for the outlet flow profile of the rotor and the stator passage the SST-CC model could simulate a more anastomotic result. In conclusion, the SST-RM model has advantage in predicting the flow fields within the blade rows, while the SST-CC model is adept in predicting the inter-row flow profiles. However, neither of them could simulate great comprehensive results in the investigated axial compressor.

Keywords

Shear stress transport curvature correction shear stress transport reattachment modification tip leakage vortex three-dimensional separating flows axial compressor

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Menter

. Review of the shear-stress transport turbulence model experience from an industrial perspective. Int J Comput Fluid Dyn 2009; 23: 305–316.

Spalart

Shur

. On the sensitization of turbulence models to rotation and curvature. Aerosp Sci Technol 1997; 1: 297–302.

Shur

Strelets

Travin

. Turbulence modeling in rotating and curved channels: Assessing the Spalart-Shur correction. AIAA J 2000; 38: 784–792.

Shur M, Strelets M, Travin A, et al. Two numerical studies of trailing vortices. In: 36th AIAA Aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, 1998. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.

Smirnov

Menter

. Sensitization of the SST turbulence model to rotation and curvature by applying the Spalart–Shur correction term. J Turbomach 2009; 131: 041010.

Stephens

Mohanarangam

. Turbulence model analysis of flow inside a hydrocyclone. Prog Comput Fluid Dyn 2010; 10: 366–373.

Tao

Xiao

Yang

. A comparative assessment of Spalart-Shur rotation/curvature correction in RANS simulations in a centrifugal pump impeller. Math Prob Eng 2014; 2014: 342905.

Bourgeois

Martinuzzi

Savory

. Assessment of turbulence model predictions for an aero-engine centrifugal compressor. J Turbomach 2010; 133: 011025.

Da Soghe

Innocenti

Andreini

. Numerical benchmark of turbulence modeling in gas turbine rotor-stator system, New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2010, pp. 771–783.

10.

Walker D and Zausner J. Rans Evaluations of internal cooling passage geometries: Ribbed passages and a 180 degree bend. New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2007, pp.645–660.

11.

auf dem Kampe T, Völker S, Sämel T, et al. Experimental and numerical investigation of flow field and downstream surface temperatures of cylindrical and diffuser shaped film cooling holes. New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2011, pp.21–34.

12.

Volkmer

Kuschel

Hirschmann

. Hub injection flow control in a turbine exhaust diffuser, New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2012, pp. 1713–1723.

13.

Marciniak V, Weber A and Kugeler E. Modelling transition for the design of modern axial turbomachines. In: 11th World Congress on computational mechanics, Barcelona, Spain, 2014.

14.

Cornelius C, Biesinger T, Zori L, et al. Efficient time resolved multistage CFD analysis applied to axial compressors. In: ASME Turbo expo 2014: Turbine technical conference and exposition, Düsseldorf, Germany, GT2014-26846, 2014.

15.

Wallin

Johansson

. Modelling streamline curvature effects in explicit algebraic Reynolds stress turbulence models. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 2002; 23: 721–730.

16.

Dhakal

Walters

. A Three-equation variant of the SST k-ω model sensitized to rotation and curvature effects. J Fluids Eng 2011; 133: 111201.

17.

Liu

Jiang

. Characteristics of the tip leakage vortex in a low-speed axial compressor. AIAA J 2007; 45: 870–878.

18.

Zhang

Liu

. The evolution of the flow topologies of 3D separations in the stator passage of an axial compressor stage. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 2013; 44: 301–311.

19.

Raw M. Robustness of coupled algebraic multigrid for the Navier-Stokes equations. In: 34th Aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, 1996. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.

20.

Rhie

Chow

. Numerical study of the turbulent flow past an airfoil with trailing edge separation. AIAA J 1983; 21: 1525–1532.

21.

ANSYS CFX HELP, Ver. 15.0: ANSYS Inc., 2013.

22.

Jones

Launder

. The calculation of low-Reynolds-number phenomena with a two-equation model of turbulence. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 1973; 16: 1119–1130.

23.

Wilcox

. Reassessment of the scale-determining equation for advanced turbulence models. AIAA J 1988; 26: 1299–1310.

24.

Menter

. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA J 1994; 32: 1598–1605.

25.

Knight DD and Saffman PG. Turbulence model predictions for flows with significant mean streamline curvature. In: AIAA 16th aerospace sciences meeting, Huntscille, Alabama, 1978.

26.

Dener C and Hirsch C. IGG - An interactive 3D surface modelling and grid generation system. In: 30th Aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, 1992. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.

27.

Liu

. Application of SPIV in turbomachinery. Exp Fluids 2006; 40: 621–642.

28.

Zhang

. Relationship between the flow blockage of tip leakage vortex and its evolutionary procedures inside the rotor passage of a subsonic axial compressor. J Therm Sci 2013; 22: 522–531.

29.

Zhang ZB, Yu XJ and Liu BJ. Characteristics of the tip leakage vortex in a low-speed axial compressor with different rotor tip gaps. In: ASME Turbo expo 2012: Turbine technical conference and exposition, 2012, GT2012-69148, pp.311–322.

30.

Delery

. Aspects of vortex breakdown. Prog Aerosp Sci 1994; 30: 1–59.