This paper presents an efficient ‘Phase-Lagged’ method developed for turbomachinery applications. The method is based on the generalized-shape-correction model. Moving average techniques as well as double-passage domain formulation were adopted in order to reduce memory requirements and improve the model robustness. The model was used to evaluate the aerodynamic performance of the high-pressure transonic turbine stage CT3, experimentally studied at the von Kármán Institute for Fluid Dynamics in the framework of the EU funded TATEF2 project. The results are discussed and compared with both the available experimental data and the results obtained by means of both steady and unsteady scaled full-annulus approaches. Computational requirements of the generalized-shape-correction model are evaluated and discussed showing that nowadays unsteady results can be obtained at an affordable computational cost.
HallKCEkiciK. Multistage coupling for unsteady flows in turbomachinery. AIAA J2005; 43: 624–632.
2.
HeLChenTWellsRG. Analysis of rotor-rotor and stator-stator interferences in multi-stage turbomachines. ASME J Turbomach2002; 124: 564–571.
3.
Blumenthal R, Hutchinson B and Zori L. Investigation of transient CFD methods applied to a transonic compressor stage. In: Proceedings of ASME turbo expo, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 6--10 June 2011, paper no. GT2011-46635.
4.
Galpin PF, Broberg RB and Hutchinson BR. Three-dimensional Navier stokes predictions of steady state rotor/stator interaction with pitch change. In: Third annual conference of the CFD society of Canada, Banff, Alberta, Canada, 25–27 June 1995.
HallKCLorenceCB. Calculation of three-dimensional unsteady flows in turbomachinery using the linearized harmonic Euler equations. ASME J Turbomach1993; 115: 800–809.
7.
Adamczyk JJ. Model equations for simulating flows in multistage-turbomachinery. In: Proceedings of ASME turbo expo, Huston, TX, USA, 17–21 March 1985, paper no. 85-GT-226.
8.
NingWHeL. Computation of unsteady flows around oscillating blades using linear and nonlinear harmonic Euler methods. ASME J Turbomach1998; 120: 508–514.
9.
He L and Ning W. Nonlinear harmonic aerodynamic modelling. In: Fransson T and Sieverding CH (ed.) von Karman Inst. lecture series programme on Aeroelasticity in axial flow turbomachines, Chaussee de Waterloo, Belgium, 1999, VKI-LS-1999-05.
10.
AdamczykJJ. Aerodynamic analysis of multistage turbomachinery flows in support of aerodynamic design. ASME J Turbomach2000; 122: 189–217.
11.
HallKCThomasJPClarkWS. Computation of unsteady nonlinear flows in cascade using a harmonic balance technique. AIAA J2002; 40: 879–886.
12.
Vilmin S, Larrain E, Hirsch C, et al. Unsteady flow modeling across the rotor/stator interface using the nonlinear harmonic method. In: Proceedings of ASME turbo expo, Barcelona, Spain, 8--11 May 2006, paper no. GT2006-90210.
ChenTVasanthakumarPHeL. Analysis of unsteady blade row interaction using nonlinear harmonic approach. AIAA J Propulsion Power2001; 17: 651–658.
15.
Giles MB. UNSFLO: a numerical method for unsteady inviscid flow in turbomachinery. Report no. GTL 195. 1988. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Dept. of Aero. and Astro.
16.
ErdosJIAlznerEMcNallyW. Numerical solution of periodic transonic flow through a fan stage. AIAA J1977; 15: 1559–1568.
17.
ArnoneA. Viscous analysis of three–dimensional rotor flow using a multigrid method. ASME J Turbomach1994; 116: 435–445.
18.
PaccianiRMarconciniMFadai-GhotbiA. Calculation of high-lift cascades in low pressure turbine conditions using a three-equation model. ASME J Turbomach2011; 133: 031016.1–031016.9.
19.
GerolymosGAChapinVC. Generalized expression of chorochronic periodicity in turbomachinery blade-row interaction. La Recherche Aérospatiale1991; 5: 69–73.
20.
HeL. An Euler solution for unsteady flows around oscillating blades. ASME J Turbomach1990; 112: 714–722.
21.
HeL. Method of simulating unsteady turbomachinery flows with multiple perturbations. AIAA J1992; 30: 2730–2735.
22.
Dewhurst S and He L. Unsteady flow calculations through turbomachinery stages using single-passage domain with shape-correction method. In: Proceedings of 9th ISUAAAT, Lyon, France, 4–8 September 2000, pp.338–350. PUG, Grenoble, France.
23.
GerolymosGAMichonGJNeubauerJ. Analysis and application of chorochronic periodicity in turbomachinery rotor/stator interaction computations. J Propulsion Power2002; 18: 1139–1152.
24.
Neubauer J. Aerodynamique 3-D instationnaire des turbomachines axiales multi-etages. PhD thesis, Universite Paris 6, 2004.
25.
Van ZanteDChenJHathawayM. The influence of compressor blade row interaction modeling on performance estimates from time–accurate, multistage, Navier–stokes simulations. ASME J Turbomach2008; 130: 011009–011009.
26.
Chen JP and Barter JW. Comparison of time-accurate calculations for the unsteady interaction in turbomachinery stage. In: Proceedings of 34th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, Cleveland, OH, USA, 13--15 July 1998, paper no 98-3292.
27.
Barter JW, Vitt PH and Chen JP. Interaction effects in a transonic turbine stage. In: Proceedings of ASME turbo expo, Munich, Germany, 8–11 May 2000, paper no. 2000-GT-0376.
28.
LiHDHeL. Single-passage solution of three-dimensional unsteady flows in a transonic fan rotor. J Power Energy2001; 215: 653–662.
29.
Biesinger T, Cornelius C, Rube C, et al. Unsteady CFD methods in a commercial solver for turbomachinery applications. In: Proceedings of ASME turbo expo, Munich, Glasgow, Scotland, UK, 14--18 June 2010, paper no. GT2010-44021.
30.
ArnoneAPaccianiR. Rotor-stator interaction analysis using the Navier-stokes equations and a multigrid method. ASME J Turbomach1996; 118: 679–689.
31.
De La Loma A, Paniagua G, Verrastro D, et al. Transonic turbine stage heat transfer investigation in presence of strong shocks. In: Proceedings of ASME turbo expo, Montreal, Canada, 14–17 May 2007, paper no. GT2007-27101.
32.
SpalartPRAllmarasSR. A one–equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows. La Recherche Aérospatiale1994; 1: 5–21.
33.
WilcoxDC. Turbulence modeling for CFD, 2nd ed. La Cañada, CA, USA: DCW Industries Inc, 1998.
34.
WilcoxDC. Formulation of the k– ω turbulence model revisited. AIAA J2008; 46: 2823–2838.
35.
De La Calzada P and Fernandez-Castaneda J. Investigation of numerical and physical modelling effects on the CFD simulation of the unsteady flow in a HPT stage. In: Proceedings of ASME turbo expo, Atlanta, GA, USA, 16--19 June 2003, paper no. GT2003-38796.
36.
PaniaguaGYasaTLomaADL. Unsteady strong shock interactions in a transonic turbine: experimental and numerical analysis. J Propulsion Power2008; 24: 722–731.
