The current contribution reports on the validation and analysis of three-dimensional computational results of the flow around four distinct high-pressure turbine blade tip geometries (TG1, 2, 3, and 4 hereinafter), taking into account the effect of the entire internal cooling setup inside the blade, at design exit Mach number: M = 0.8, and high exit Reynolds number: ReC = 900 000. Three of the four geometries represent different tip design solutions – TG1: full squealer rim; TG2: single squealer on the suction side; TG3: partial suction and pressure side squealer, and one (TG4) models TG1 in worn condition. This article provides a comparison between the different geometries from the aerodynamic point of view, analyses the losses, and evaluates the distinct design solutions. An assessment of the effect of the uneven rubbing of the blade tip was performed as well.
TG1 was found to be the top performer followed by TG3 and TG2. According to the investigations, the effect of rubbing increased the kinetic loss coefficient by 10–15 per cent.
XiaoX.McCarterA. A.LakshminarayanaB.Tip clearance effects in a turbine rotor: Part i – pressure field and loss. ASME J. Turbomach., 2001, 123, 296–304.
2.
McCarterA. A.XiaoX.LakshminarayanaB.Tip clearance effects in a turbine rotor: Part ii – velocity field and flow physics. ASME J. Turbomach., 2001, 123, 305–313.
3.
TallmanJ.XiaoX.LakshminarayanaB.Numerical simulation of tip leakage flows in axial flow turbines, with emphasis on flow physics: Part i – effect of tip clearance height. ASME J. Turbomach., 2001, 123, 314–323.
4.
TallmanJ.XiaoX.LakshminarayanaB.Numerical simulation of tip leakage flows in axial flow turbines, with emphasis on flow physics: Part ii – effect of outer casing relative motion. ASME J. Turbomach., 2001, 123, 324–333.
5.
MayleR. E.MetzgerD. E.Heat transfer at the tip of an unshrouded turbine blade. In Heat Transfer 1982, SeventhInternational Conference, Munich, West Germany, 6–10 September 1982, pp. 87–92.
6.
AmeriA. A.SteinthorssonE.RigbyD. L.Effect of squealer tip on rotor heat transfer efficiency. ASME J. Turbomach., 1998, 120, (4), 753–759.
7.
PapaM.GoldsteinR. J.GoriF.Effects of tip geometry and tip clearance on the mass/heat transfer from a large-scale gas turbine blade. ASME J. Turbomach., 2003, 125, 90–96.
8.
KwakJ. S.AhnJ.HanJ.-C.LeeC. P.BunkerR. S.BoyleR.GauglerR.Heat transfer on the squealer tip and near-tip regions of a gas turbine blade with single or double squealer. ASME J. Turbomach., 2003, 125, 778–787.
9.
KwakJ. S.AhnJ.HanJ.-C.Effects of rim location, rim height, and tip clearance on the tip and near tip region heat transfer of a gas turbine blade. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 2004, 47, 5651–5663.
10.
YangH.AcharyaS.EkkadS. V.PrakashC.BunkerR.Flow and heat transfer predictions for a flat-tip turbine bladeIn ASME Turbo Expo, Amsterdam, June 2002, GT-2002-30190.
11.
YangH.AcharyaS.EkkadS. V.PrakashC.BunkerR.Numerical simulation of flow and heat transfer past a turbine blade with a squealer-tipIn ASME Turbo Expo, Amsterdam, June 2002, GT-2002-30193.
12.
AcharyaS.YangH.EkkadS. V.PrakashC.BunkerR.Numerical simulation of film cooling on the tip of a gas turbine bladeIn ASME Turbo Expo, Amsterdam, June 2002, GT-2002-30553.
13.
HoferT.Advanced unshrouded blade tip cooling strategiesPhD Thesis, von Kármán Institute for Fluid Dynamics / Université Catholique de Louvain.
14.
KeyN.ArtsT.Comparison of turbine tip leakage flow for flat tip and squealer tip geometries at high-speed conditions. ASME J. Turbomach., 2006, 128, 213–218.
15.
ArtsT.GinibreP.OksuzO.IliopoulouV.KeyN.Comparison of turbine tip leakage flows for flat tip and squealer tip configurations – experimental and numerical investigationMarch 2005Proceedings of the 6th European Turbomachinery Conference, Lille, France.
16.
VassP.ArtsT.Advanced aero-thermal investigation of high pressure turbine tip flows. Heat Transfer Research, 2011, 42, (2), 165–180.
17.
HoferT.ArtsT.Aerodynamic investigation of the tip leakage flow for blades with different tip squealer geometries at transonic conditions. In Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2009, Power for land, sea, and airOrlando, Florida, USA, 8–12 June 2009, GT-2009-59909.
18.
HoferT.LegrandM.PonsL.ArtsT.Aerodynamic investigation of the leakage flow for a blade with a squealer tip at transonic conditionsProceedings of the 8th European Turbomachinery ConferenceGraz, Austria, 23–27 March 2009.
19.
ArtsT.LambertM.Aerothermal performance of a two-dimensional highly loaded transonic nozzle guide vane: A test case for inviscid and viscous flow computations. ASME J. Turbomach., 1992, 114, 147–159.
20.
CambierL.VeuillotJ.-P.Status of the elsA cfd software for flow simulation and multidisciplinary applicationsIn Proceedings of the 46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada, USA, 7–10 January 2008, AIAA 2008–664.
21.
MenterF. R.Improved two-equation k – omega turbulence models for aerodynamic flowsTechnical Paper 103975, NASA, 1992.
22.
HirschC.Numerical computation of internal & external flows – fundamentals of computational fluid dynamics, 2009Kidlington, Oxford, UKElsevier.
23.
StegerJ.DoughertyF.BenekJ.A chimera grid schemeIn Proceedings of the ASME Mini Symposium on Advances in grid generation, Houston, Texas, USA, June 1983, ASME FED Vol. 5.
24.
JeanfaivreG.BenoitC.LePapeM.-C.Improvement of the robustness of the chimera methodTechnical Paper 95-0353, AIAA, Saint-Louis, Minnesota, USA, June 2002.
25.
MenterF. R.A comparison of some recent eddy-viscosity turbulence models.ASME J. Fluids Engng, 1996, 118, 514–519.
