Thermodynamic performance study of an integrated gasification fuel cell combined cycle: An energy analysis

Abstract

In this paper, an energy analysis of an integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) with a high-temperature, pressurized solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) in the topping cycle and a single-pressure nonreheat steam bottoming cycle has been presented. The objective is to identify the components responsible for major exergy losses and to optimize the design and operating parameters with respect to second law performance of the combined cycle. This analysis reveals that the gasifier and SOFC contribute to the major part of the total exergy loss arising from the gasification and electrochemical reactions occurring respectively in these components. A higher pressure ratio across the gas turbine is found to reduce exergy losses in the gasifier, SOFC, and the stack. On the other hand, higher SOFC operating temperature is found to increase the exergy losses in the combustion chamber, economizer, and stack, while it decreases the loss in the SOFC.

Keywords

IGCC SOFC exergy loss exergetic efficiency

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Birol

Argiri

World energy prospects to 2020. Energy, 1999, 24, 905–918.

McMullan

J. T.

Williams

B. C.

Sloan

E. P.

Clean coal technologies. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part A: J. Power and Energy, 1997, 211, 95–107.

Beve

Advances in solid oxide fuel cells and integrated power plants. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part A: J. Power and Energy, 1997, 211, 359–366.

Watanabe

Fuel cell power system applications in Japan. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part A: J. Power and Energy, 1997, 211, 113–119.

Pangalis

N. G.

Martinez-Butas

R. F.

Brandom

N. P.

Integration of solid oxide fuel cells into gas turbine power generation cycles. Part-I: Fuel cell thermodynamic modeling. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part A: J. Power and Energy, 2002, 216, 129–144.

Fry

M. R.

Watson

Hatchman

J. C.

Design of a prototype fuel cell/composite cycle power station. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part A: J. Power and Energy, 1997, 211, 171–180.

Rao

A. D.

Samuelsen

G. S.

Analysis strategies for tubular solid oxide fuel cell based hybrid systems. J. Engng for Gas Turbine Power, 2002, 124, 503–509.

Cunnel

Pangalis

N. G.

Martinez-Butas

R. F.

Integration of solid oxide fuel cells into gas turbine power generation cycles: Part-II. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part A: J. Power and Energy, 2002, 216, 145–154.

Massardo

A. F.

Lubelli

Internal reforming solid oxide fuel cell-gas turbine: Part A — Cell model and cycle thermodynamic analysis. J Engng for Gas Turbine Power, 2000, 122, 27–35.

10.

Eg & G Services, Parsons Inc., Sc. Applications Int. Corporation. Fuel Cell Handbook, 5th edition, 2000 (US DOE, National Energy Technology Laboratory, West Virginia).

11.

Lobachyov

Richter

H. J.

Combined cycle gas turbine power plant with coal gasification and solid oxide fuel cell. J. Energy Resources Technol., 1996, 118, 285–292.

12.

Ghosh

Thermodynamic performance study of an integrated gasification fuel cell combined cycle — an energy analysis. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part A: J. Power and Energy, 2003, 217, 137–147.

13.

Gardner

F. J.

Thermodynamic processes in solid oxide and other fuel cells. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part A: J. Power and Energy, 1997, 211, 367–380.

14.

Bedringas

K. W.

Ertesvag

I. S.

Byggestoyl

Magnussen

Exergy analysis of solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) systems. Energy, 1997, 22, 403–412.

15.

Kotas

T. J.

The exergy method of thermal plant analysis, 1985 (Butterworths, London).

16.

Moran

M. J.

Availability analysis: A guide to efficient energy use, 1982 (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).

17.

Horlock

J. H.

The rational efficiency of power plants and their components. J. Engng for Gas Turbine Power, 1992, 114, 603–611.