Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2026
Computational fluid dynamics analysis and transfer matrix optimisation for evaluating the noise absorption performance of tessellated polyform structure
This study presents the design, development, and acoustic characterisation of a tessellated polyform absorber composed of perforated panels (PPs) made from jute-reinforced rigid composites. A full factorial optimisation involving 72 combinations—spanning 12 geometric variants, six cavity depths, multiple perforation ratios, and orifice diameters—was conducted using impedance tube measurements. Integration of jute fleece within the backing cavity, combined with an L-tromino tessellation, enabled noise absorption (NAC ≥0.9) across 400–6300 Hz in a single modular structure. To explain deviations from the classical Maa model, the transfer matrix was progressively refined: T1 accounted for orifice irregularities caused by jute-fibre fraying; T2 incorporated additional damping from jute fleece in the cavity. CFD simulations were conducted to qualitatively examine the influence of tessellated geometry on local airflow patterns and edge-induced vortical structures around the L-tromino elements. The analysis highlights how geometric discontinuities influence local viscous interaction, supporting the proposed topology-driven acoustic design. The resulting tessellated polyform structure demonstrates high acoustic efficiency along with favourable mechanical strength and fire-retardant characteristics of SMC-based natural fibre composites. This integrated approach offers a sustainable, geometry-driven solution suitable for precision acoustic environments such as recording studios and controlled architectural spaces.
KingEA. Here, there, and everywhere: how the SDGs must include noise pollution in their development challenges. Environment2022; 64: 17–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.2022.2046456
2.
UNESCO Institute for Statistics. SDG 11 synthesis report: tracking progress towards inclusive. In: Safe, resilient and sustainable cities and human settlements, 2018. United Nations.
3.
BasuGDattaMSenguptaS, et al.Jute felt for noise reduction: understanding effect of pore size distribution. J Nat Fibers2022; 19: 6482–6496. https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2021.1921663
4.
FinkD. A new definition of noise: noise is unwanted And/or harmful sound. Noise is the new ‘secondhand smoke. Proc Meet Acoust2020; 39: 050002.
5.
DattaMDasSNathD. Textiles for noise control. In: KumarB (ed). Textiles for Functional Applications. IntechOpen, 2021. Epub ahead of print 22. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.99274
MagoJSunaliNA, et al.Sound insulation: key concepts and technologies. In: GargNGautamCRabS, et al. (eds). Handbook of Vibroacoustics, Noise and Harshness. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, pp. 1–44.
8.
GargNGautamCDeviA. Airborne sound absorption characteristics of acoustical materials for noise control applications. In: GargNGautamCRabS, et al. (eds). Handbook of Vibroacoustics, Noise and Harshness. Singapore: Springer Nature, pp. 1–30.
9.
MedvedS. Building acoustics and noise control in buildings. Building Physics. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 331–406.
10.
American National Standards Institute & Acoustical Society of America. American national standard acoustical performance criteria, design requirements, and guidelines for schools, part 1: permanent schools. Acoustical Society of America.
NoberLWNoberEH. Auditory discrimination of learning disabled children in quiet and classroom noise. J Learn Disabil1975; 8: 656–659. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221947500801010
BradleyJSSatoHPicardM. On the importance of early reflections for speech in rooms. J Acoust Soc Am2003; 113: 3233–3244. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1570439
15.
RakerdBHunterEJBerardiM, et al.Assessing the acoustic characteristics of rooms: a tutorial with examples. Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups2018; 3: 8–24. https://doi.org/10.1044/persp3.SIG19.8
SheikhMozafariMJ. Enhancing sound absorption in micro-perforated panel and porous material composite in low frequencies: a numerical study using FEM. Sound Vib2024; 58: 81–100. https://doi.org/10.32604/sv.2024.048897
18.
NingJFRenSWZhaoGP. Acoustic properties of micro-perforated panel absorber having arbitrary cross-sectional perforations. Appl Acoust2016; 111: 135–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2016.04.012
19.
WangJBennettGJ. Multi-chamber micro-perforated panel absorbers optimised for high amplitude broadband absorption using a two-point impedance method. J Sound Vib2023; 547: 117527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2022.117527
20.
LiYLinYYaoS, et al.Low-frequency broadband sound absorption of the metastructure with extended tube resonators and porous materials. Appl Acoust2024; 217: 109827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2023.109827
CarbajoJPoveda-MartínezPGodinhoL, et al.Tunable perforated panel sound absorbers for variable acoustics room design. Appl Sci2024; 14: 2094. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14052094
23.
MeiZYangHDingY, et al.Ultra-broadband sound absorption via a parallel composite structure consisting of perforated panel resonators with tube bundles and porous material. Appl Acoust2024; 222: 110071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2024.110071
24.
AfsharfardAJafariARadYA, et al.Modifying vibratory behavior of the car seat to decrease the neck injury. J Vib Eng Technol2023; 11: 1115–1126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-022-00627-4
25.
AfsharfardAFarshidianfarA. An efficient method to solve the strongly coupled nonlinear differential equations of impact dampers. Arch Appl Mech2012; 82: 977–984. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00419-011-0605-1
26.
JafariAAfsharfardA. Metamaterial Bi-stable vibration absorbers for railway tracks: experimental study of flexural wave control. Epub ahead of print 232025. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2506.18801
27.
NathDDasDChattopadhyayS, et al.Using polyethylene terephthalate bottle waste as a viable precursor for the synthesis of unsaturated polyester resin in fabrication of jute fibre reinforced composites. Polym Polym Compos2024; 32: 09673911241233171. https://doi.org/10.1177/09673911241233171
28.
DattaMBasuGNathD, et al.Non-destructive reverberant testing of natural fibrous samples in a diffused acoustic field environment. Textil Res J2024; 94: 1724–1736. https://doi.org/10.1177/00405175241235396
29.
HelmholtzHvon. On the sensations of tone as a physiological basis for the theory of music. Longmans, Green1885.
30.
PhongVPapamoschouD. Acoustic transmission loss of perforated plates. In: 18th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference (33rd AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference). American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2012, pp. 2012–2071. Epub ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.2514/6
MathurA. Acoustic metamaterial architectured composite layers, methods of manufacturing the same, and methods for noise control using the same. US9390702B2. https://patents.google.com/patent/US9390702B2/en (2016), (accessed 6 May 2025).
36.
ZhaoXFanX. Enhancing low frequency sound absorption of micro-perforated panel absorbers by using mechanical impedance plates. Appl Acoust2015; 88: 123–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2014.08.015
37.
BravoTMauryC. Sound attenuation and absorption by micro-perforated panels backed by anisotropic fibrous materials: theoretical and experimental study. J Sound Vib2018; 425: 189–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2018.04.006
38.
SongBHBoltonJS. A transfer-matrix approach for estimating the characteristic impedance and wave numbers of limp and rigid porous materials. J Acoust Soc Am2000; 107: 1131–1152. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.428404
PickeringKLEfendyMGALeTM. A review of recent developments in natural fibre composites and their mechanical performance. Compos Part Appl Sci Manuf2016; 83: 98–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.08.038
LiQWuJMaoQ, et al.Optimization design and analysis of the broadband acoustic absorber of the microperforated panel with an interpolated straight tube. J Vib Control2024; 30: 5110–5121. https://doi.org/10.1177/10775463231217780
45.
WangJBennettGJ. Ultra-broadband sound absorption in a compact multi-chamber micro-perforated panel absorber with varying depths. AIP Adv2024; 14: 015009. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0187328
46.
LechnerEMAngleJWPalczewskiAD, et al.Oxide dissolution and oxygen diffusion scenarios in niobium and implications on the bean–livingston barrier in superconducting cavities. J Appl Phys2024; 135: 133902. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0191234
47.
MinHLouHZhaoY. Optimization of parallel coiled cavities of different depths in microperforated panel sound absorbers. Sci Rep2025; 15: 1401. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-85171-3
48.
QianYLiBZhangJ. Dual-gradient multilayer ultra-microperforated panel composite for ultra-broadband and quasi-perfect sound absorption. Appl Phys Lett2025; 126: 131702. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0257704
49.
YangXBaiPShenX, et al.Optimal design and experimental validation of sound absorbing multilayer microperforated panel with constraint conditions. Appl Acoust2019; 146: 334–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2018.11.032
50.
WangXLiangCMeiY. Optimization design of a micro-perforated panel absorber with 8.6 octave bands. ArXiv. 2023; 2305.18298 [eess.AS]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.18298
51.
ShiJLuoJLiuC, et al.Metamaterial sound absorbers based on microperforated panels: an approach toward enhanced flexibility and near-limit broadband performance. ArXiv. 2025; 2501.07012 [physics.app-ph]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2501.07012
52.
ShenXBaiPYangX, et al.Low frequency sound absorption by optimal combination structure of porous metal and microperforated panel. Appl Sci2019; 9: 1507. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9071507
