The present study analyses plate structures subjected to hydrostatic load. The plates are modelled and analysed using finite element method-based software, ANSYS Workbench. The unstiffened plate structure is first examined, and responses are recorded. Further, the plate is stiffened using one, cross (two) and three flat stiffeners, considering almost the same volume of material as used in the modelling of an unstiffened plate. The static response of plate structures is presented and compared by keeping all edges of the plates either hinged or clamped. The thickness of the plate or stiffener is kept at a minimum of 6 mm as specified in IS 800:1984 (Clause no. 3.8.2). The outstand of the stiffeners are modelled based on IS 800: 2007 (Clause no. 8.7.1.2). The different configurations of stiffened plates are further compared with unstiffened plate, also the stiffeners placements are changed between horizontal and vertical (except in cross stiffened plate). The spacing between the central and extreme stiffeners is kept constant, and the extreme stiffeners are placed at the centre of the central stiffener and the extreme edge of the plate. The results highlight the influence of stiffening configurations or stiffener eccentricity in decreasing deflection and stress under hydrostatic load. It is found that the eccentric position produces a serious impact on the distribution of stiffness, transfer of stress and the overall structural response of the plate. The study offers helpful information for improving plate-stiffener systems in real, practical applications involving hydrostatic pressure.
AmabiliMKwakMK. Vibration of circular plates on a free fluid surface: effect of surface waves. J Sound Vib1999; 226: 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.1998.2304
7.
MaityDBhattacharyyaSK. Time domain analysis of infinite reservoir by finite element method using a novel far-boundary condition. Finite Elem Anal Des1999; 32: 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-874X(98)00077-8
8.
CheungYKZhouD. Coupled vibratory characteristics of a rectangular container bottom plate. J Fluid Struct2000; 14: 339–357. https://doi.org/10.1006/jfls.1999.0272
9.
CheungYKZhouD. Hydroelastic vibration of a circular container bottom plate using the galerkin method. J Fluid Struct2000; 16: 561–580. https://doi.org/10.1006/jfls.2001.0430
SheikhAHMukhopadhyayM. Linear and nonlinear transient vibration analysis of stiffened plate structures. Finite Elem Anal Des2002; 38(6): 477–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-874X(01)00081-6
12.
ViragZ. Optimum design of stiffened plates for different load and shapes of ribs. J Comput Appl Mech2004; 5(1): 165–179.
13.
MaityD. A novel far-boundary condition for the finite element analysis of infinite reservoir. Appl Math Comput2005; 170: 1314–1328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2005.01.020
14.
HasanMM. Optimum design of stiffened square plates for longitudinal and square ribs. Al-Khawarizmi Eng J2007; 3(3): 13–30.
15.
PaniPKBhattacharayyaSK. Hydrodynamic pressure on a vertical gate considering fluid-structure interaction. Finite Elem Anal Des2008; 44: 759–766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2008.04.006
16.
PaniPKBhattacharayyaSK. Finite element analysis of a vertical rectangular plate coupled with an unbounded fluid domain on one side using a truncated far boundary. J Hydrodyn2009; 21: 190–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-6058(08)60136-5
17.
SinghDKDuggalSKPalP. Analysis of stiffened plates using FEM – a parametric study. Int Res J Eng Technol2015; 2(4): 1650–1656.
SinghDKAgarwalP. Static and dynamic analyses of stiffened and unstiffened square steel plates under static and hydrostatic loads using finite element method. Ships Offshore Struct2024; 21(4): 477–497. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2024.2431259
GuiCLeiJLinW, et al.Static performance and elastic buckling analysis of stiffened plates with flat flanges. Int J Steel Struct2021; 21: 1588–1604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-021-00522-w
28.
PengFYuKHuoY, et al.Modal identification of double-layer hollow stiffened plate structure using variational mode decomposition based on high-speed digital image correlation. Aerosp Syst2022; 5: 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42401-022-00146-w
RazakNSAAliasAMohsanNM, et al.Numerical investigation of the failure of stiffened steel plates subjected to near-field blast loads. J Fail Anal Prev2023; 23: 569–591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-023-01628-5
31.
StamatelosDGGeorgeNL. Buckling analysis of laminated stiffened plates with material anisotropy using the rayleigh–ritz approach. Computation2023; 11(6): 110–126. https://doi.org/10.3390/computation11060110
32.
ZhangHDingYHeL, et al.The modeling method for vibration characteristics analysis of composite-laminated rotationally stiffened plate. Shock Vib2024; 2024: 6686343. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/6686343
33.
WangYWangZLiangS, et al.Experimental and numerical study on the failure modes of ship stiffened plate structure under projectile perforation. Int J Impact Eng2023; 177: 104590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2023.104590
34.
ChangXXuFFengW, et al.Similarity laws of geometric distortion for stiffened plate under low velocity impact loads. Thin-Walled Struct2024; 199: 111830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2024.111830
35.
ANSYS Inc. Static structural and modal modules. ANSYS Theory Manual. ANSYS2011; 14.0: 1.
36.
IS 800. General construction in steel – code of practice. New Delhi, India: Bureau of Indian Standards, 1984.
37.
IS 800. General construction in steel – code of practice. New Delhi, India: Bureau of Indian Standards, 2007.
38.
TimoshenkoSKriegerSW. Theory of plates and shells. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill, 1959.
