To effectively identify the rotor–stator rubbing positions in aero-engine, the paper has proposed the combination of intrinsic time-scale decomposition (ITD) and classification algorithm. Regarding that with larger noise component in proper rotation component (PRC) signals after ITD, it will be more difficult to extract the characteristic information of rubbing faults, the PRC correspondings to the largest noise was eliminated. Meanwhile, signals were reconstructed based on residual proper rotation components, and positions of rubbing faults were identified according to the reconstructed signal. As rubbing extent and other factors cannot be completely the same in each rubbing, energy of reconstructed signal has been normalized to reduce the difference. Normalized energy indexes were inputted into classification algorithm as feature vectors to identify the positions of rubbing faults. To identify the superiority of approach, a comparison has been made between the proposed approach and the method of directly extracting normalized energy indexes of acceleration signals. The result of comparison shows that the two methods both work well in the identification rate of training and test samples; as for the identification rate for an unknown sample, the proposed method is superior to the other, with identification rate increasing by 17% and 9.4%.
ZhangHLiX, et al.A review of misalignment of aero-engine rotor system [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica2019; 40(06): 42–53.
2.
LiFGuoC. Dynamics analysis, feature extraction and intelligent diagnosis for rubbing fault of rotor supported on bull bearings [J]. J Aerospace Power2007; 11: 1879–1885.
3.
HaiqinQYaotaoZKejunX. Rubbing vibration response theoretical analysis and experimental verification for a double rotor support casing system. J Mech Eng2019; 55(19): 75–83.
4.
LinXLiB, et al.Rub-impact characteristics of bearing co-cavity turboshaft engine with flexible static parts [J]. J Aerospace Power2019; 34(09): 1914–1926.
5.
QiXYaoH, et al.Quantitative diagnosis method for double rubbing fault locations in a rotor system [J]. J Vibration Shock2014; 33(12): 24–27.
6.
MokhtarADarpeAK, et al. Analysis of stator vibration response for the diagnosis of rub in a coupled rotor-stator system [J]. Int J Mech Sci2018; 144: 392–406.
7.
MaHYangJ, et al.Review and prospect on the research of rub-impact experiment of rotor systems [J]. J Vibration Shock2014; 33(06): 1–12.
8.
AlejandroSZarzoA, et al.Early fault detection of single-point rub in gas turbines with accelerometers on the casing based on continuous wavelet transform [J]. J Sound Vibration, 2020, 487.
9.
HallL.DMbaD. Diagnosis of continuous rotor–stator rubbing in large scale turbine units using acoustic emissions. Ultrasonics2004; 41(09): 765–773.
10.
LuYLiuY. Research on the feature recognition of the coupled rub impact fault based on BP-AdaBoost [J]. Mod Manufacturing Eng2017; 440(05): 162–167.
11.
LiWLiS. Research summary on the rub impact fault of the rotor system [J]. J Machine Des2021; 38(03): 1–9.
12.
JinZYuB, et al.The rub-impact fault diagnosis based on wavelet analysis-least square support vector machine [J]. J Shenyang Univ Chem Tech2019; 33(03): 251–256+288.
13.
YinZShenX. Rubbing acoustic emission recognition based on GMM mean supervector sparse decomposition [J]. Chin J Electron Devices2018; 41(04): 928–935.
14.
HanJZuoYKunF. Response mechanism of thin-walled casing support system under periodic rubbing exciation [J]. J Aerospace Power2021; 36(01): 167–175.
15.
FangJ. Aero-engine rub-impact fault identification based on casing strain in flight [J]. J Air Force Eng University(Natural Sci Edition)2019; 20(03): 22–28.
16.
LiuLGuoC, et al.Intelligent recognition for radial rubbing location of an aero-engine rotor-stator [J]. J Vibration Shock2013; 32(03): 141–145.
17.
SunYJianhuiWTengG. Fault diagnosis of rotor rub-impact based on D-S evidence fusing [J]. J Naval Univ Eng2011; 23(03): 35–38.
18.
XiongXYangS, et al.Recognition method for rotor system under full annular rub and partial rub [J]. J Vibration Shock2012; 31(16): 13–17.
19.
GuoCYuM, et al.Identifying rotor-stator rubbing positions using the cepstrum analysis technique [J]. J Mech Eng2014; 50(07): 32–38.
20.
GuoCLiuY, et al.A novel method for identifying rotor-stator rubbing positions using the cepstrum analysis technique [J]. J Mech Sci Tech2014; 28(9): 3537–3544.
21.
YuMGuoC, et al.Aero-engine rotor-stator rubbing position identification based on casing strain signals [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica2013; 34(06): 1474–1484.
22.
AiLGuoCYuM. Aero-engine rotor-stator rubbing positions diagnosis rule acquisition based on support vector machine [J]. J Aerospace Power2013; 28(10): 2181–2193.
23.
PengWJingL, et al.Rotor rub-impact fault recognition method using features of AE spectrogram [J]. J Vibration Eng2019; 32(06): 1094–1103.
24.
ChenWDuF, et al.Identification of rotor-rubbing malfunctions in aero-engines [J]. J Aerospace Power2009; 24(08): 1707–1713.
25.
WangWGanC. Identification of the vibration responses of a rub-impact rotor under uncertain excitations [J]. J Vibration Shock2019; 38(18): 122–127+200.
26.
YuanSChuF. Diagnostic approach to detect rub-impact fault of shaft based on sphere support vector machines [J]. J Vibration Shock2009; 28(08): 70–73+77+199200.
27.
GaoSWuYJiangZ. Static and dynamic rubbing positions identification of cryocooler based on wavelet packet analysis and support vector machine [J]. J Infrared Millimeter Waves2019; 38(05): 627–632.
28.
ZhangXLiangY, et al.A novel bearing fault diagnosis model integrated permutation entropy, ensemble empirical mode decomposition and optimized SVM [J]. Measurement2015; 69: 164–179.
29.
XuZLiZ, et al.Fault diagnosis of rolling bearing of wind turbines based on the variational mode decomposition and deep convolutional neural networks [J]. Appl Soft Comput J2020; 95: 106515.
30.
WangSXiangJ, et al.Convolutional neural network-based hidden Markov models for rolling element bearing fault identification [J]. Knowledge-Based Syst2018; 144: 65–76.
31.
ChengGChengY, et al.Gear fault identification based on Hilbert–Huang transform and SOM neural network. Measurement2013; 03(46): 1137–1146.
32.
LiJYaoX, et al.Multiscale local features learning based on bp neural network for rolling bearing intelligent fault diagnosis [J]. Measurement2020; 153: 107419.
33.
Frei MarkGOsorioI. Intrinsic time-scale decomposition: time-frequency-energy analysis and real-time filtering of non-stationary signals. Proc Math Phys Eng Sci2007; 463: 321–342.
34.
YuJLiuH, et al.Fault feature extraction method of rolling bearings based on ITD-SCS [J]. J Vibration Shock2018; 37(19): 23–29.
35.
YuMPanX. A novel ITD-GSP-based characteristic extraction method for compound faults of rolling bearing. J Meas2020: 159.
36.
YangYPanH, et al.A roller bearing fault diagnosis method based on the improved ITD and RRVPMCD [J]. Measurement, 2014, p. 55.
37.
ChuD. Research on Fault Signal Analysis and Diagnosis Technology for Rotating Machinery [D]. Beijing): North China Electric Power University, 2017.
38.
YangYWangH, et al.A rotor fault diagnosis method based on ITD improved algorithm and correlation dimension [J]. J Vibration Shock2012; 31(23): 67–70+76.
