Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is extensively studied as a neuromodulation tool in neurological disorders. However, its use with the central vestibular disorders is limited.
Objective
To evaluate the utility of TMS as an assessment and treatment of chronic vestibular disorders and propose recommendations for future work.
Methods
A comprehensive search of four electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine Source) identified 206 records of which 16 studies were included.
Results
One study used TMS as a neurophysiological assessment tool and 15 used repetitive TMS (rTMS) as a neuromodulatory intervention. Mal de Debarquement syndrome was the most frequently explored diagnosis. Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and the cerebellum were the most frequent sites for rTMS application. Statistically significant improvements were noted on the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (3/7 studies) but clinically significant improvements were not observed. Postural control (7/7 studies) showed improvements along with VOR gain (1/1 studies).
Conclusions
TMS shows promise as both a neurophysiological assessment tool and a neuromodulatory intervention for chronic vestibular disorders. Methodological limitations of the studies warrant caution while interpreting the results. Larger sample sizes, control groups, optimal neuroanatomical targeting, and dosing along with active rehabilitation are required to determine effectiveness in chronic vestibular disorders.
DunlapPMKhojaSSWhitneySL, et al.Assessment of health care utilization for dizziness in ambulatory care settings in the United States. Otol Neurotol2019; 40(9): e918–e924.
2.
BeneckeHAgusSKuessnerD, et al.The burden and impact of vertigo: findings from the REVERT patient registry. Front Neurol2013; 4: 136.
3.
NeuhauserHKRadtkeAvon BrevernM, et al.Burden of dizziness and vertigo in the community. Arch Intern Med2008; 168(19): 2118–2124.
4.
BhattacharyyaNGubbelsSPSchwartzSR, et al.Clinical practice guideline: benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (update). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg2017; 156: S1–S47.
5.
HallCDHerdmanSJWhitneySL, et al.Vestibular rehabilitation for peripheral vestibular hypofunction: an updated clinical practice guideline from the academy of neurologic physical therapy of the American physical therapy association. J Neurol Phys Ther2022; 46(2): 118–177.
6.
WhitneySLSpartoPJFurmanJM. Vestibular rehabilitation and factors that can affect outcome. Semin Neurol2020; 40(01): 165–172.
7.
SteensnaesMHKnapstadMKGoplenFK, et al.Persistent Postural-Perceptual Dizziness (PPPD) and quality of life: a cross-sectional study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol2023; 280(12): 5285.
8.
BatinovićFSunaraDKoštaV, et al.Psychiatric comorbidities and quality of life in patients with vestibular migraine and migraine without vertigo: a cross-sectional study from a tertiary clinic. Audiol Res2024; 14(5): 778–789.
9.
BalciBAkdalG. Outcome of vestibular rehabilitation in vestibular migraine. J Neurol2022; 269(12): 6246–6253.
10.
NadaEHIbraheemOAHassaanMR. Vestibular rehabilitation therapy outcomes in patients with persistent postural-perceptual dizziness. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol2019; 128(4): 323–329.
11.
SharonJDKrauterRChaeR, et al.A placebo controlled, randomized clinical trial of galcanezumab for vestibular migraine: the INVESTMENT study. Headache2024; 64(10): 1264–1272.
12.
MinSKimJSParkHY. Predictors of treatment response to pharmacotherapy in patients with persistent postural–perceptual dizziness. J Neurol2021; 268(7): 2523–2532.
13.
WaterstonJChenLMahonyK, et al.Persistent Postural-Perceptual Dizziness: precipitating conditions, co-morbidities and treatment with cognitive behavioral therapy. Front Neurol2021; 12: 795516.
14.
KuwabaraJKondoMKabayaK, et al.Acceptance and commitment therapy combined with vestibular rehabilitation for persistent postural-perceptual dizziness: a pilot study. Am J Otolaryngol2020; 41(6): 102609.
15.
IbrahimNMKHazzaNMAYaseenDM, et al.Effect of vestibular rehabilitation games in patients with persistent postural perceptual dizziness and its relation to anxiety and depression: prospective study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol2024; 281(6): 2861–2869.
VucicSStanley ChenKHKiernanMC, et al.Clinical diagnostic utility of transcranial magnetic stimulation in neurological disorders. Updated report of an IFCN committee. Clin Neurophysiol2023; 150: 131–175.
18.
StampanoniBMButtariFGilioL, et al.Inflammation and corticospinal functioning in multiple sclerosis: a TMS perspective. Front Neurol2020; 11: 566.
19.
Valls-SoléJPascual-LeoneABrasil-NetoJP, et al.Abnormal facilitation of the response to transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Neurology1994; 44(4): 735.
20.
ChenMSummersRLSPrudenteCN, et al.Transcranial magnetic stimulation and functional magnet resonance imaging evaluation of adductor spasmodic dysphonia during phonation. Brain Stimul2020; 13(3): 908–915.
21.
FangLZhangWWuJ, et al.Effects of combining rTMs and augmented reality gait adaptive training on walking function of patients with stroke based on three-dimensional gait analysis and sEMG: a randomized controlled trial. Physiother Theory Pract2024; 1–11.
22.
YassineIAShehataHHamdyS, et al.Effect of high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on the balance and the white matter integrity in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a long-term follow-up study. Mult Scler Relat Disord2024; 83: 105471.
23.
PrudenteCNChenMStipancicKL, et al.Effects of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in adductor laryngeal dystonia: a safety, feasibility, and pilot study. Exp Brain Res2022; 240(2): 561–574.
24.
TriccoACLillieEZarinW, et al.PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med2018; 169(7): 467–473.
25.
MunnZBarkerTHMoolaS, et al.Methodological quality of case series studies: an introduction to the JBI critical appraisal tool. JBI Evid Synth2019; 18(10): 2127.
26.
AhmadHRobertsREPatelM, et al.Downregulation of early visual cortex excitability mediates oscillopsia suppression. Neurology2017; 89(11): 1179–1185.
27.
BrowneCJSheebaSRAstillT, et al.Assessing the synergistic effectiveness of intermittent theta burst stimulation and the vestibular ocular reflex rehabilitation protocol in the treatment of Mal de Debarquement Syndrome: a randomised controlled trial. J Neurol2024; 271(5): 2615–2630.
28.
Grobe-EinslerMBorkFFaikusA, et al.Feasibility of a randomized, sham-controlled pilot study for accelerated rTMS-treatment of the cerebellum plus physiotherapy in CANVAS patients. NRE2024; 54(4): 691–698.
29.
BuardILopez-EsquibelNSchoenebergerS, et al.Transcranial magnetic stimulation as treatment for Mal de Debarquement Syndrome: Case report and literature review. Cognit Behav Neurol2020; 33(2): 145–153.
30.
LeaoMTMachetanzKSandritterJ, et al.Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for Tinnitus treatment in vestibular Schwannoma: a pilot study. Front Neurol2021; 12: 646014.
31.
ChaYHDeblieckCWuAD. Double-blind sham-controlled crossover trial of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for Mal de Debarquement Syndrome. Otol Neurotol2016; 37(6): 805–812.
32.
DingLShouGYuanH, et al.Lasting modulation effects of rTMS on neural activity and connectivity as revealed by resting-state EEG. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng2014; 61(7): 2070–2080.
33.
PaxmanEStillingJMercierL, et al.Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) as a treatment for chronic dizziness following mild traumatic brain injury. BMJ Case Rep2018; 2018: bcr-2018-226698.
34.
PearceAJDaviesCPMajorBP. Efficacy of neurostimulation to treat symptoms of Mal de Debarquement Syndrome. A preliminary study using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Neuropsychol2015; 9(2): 336–341.
35.
ChaYHShouGGleghornD, et al.Electrophysiological signatures of intrinsic functional connectivity related to rTMS treatment for Mal de Debarquement Syndrome. Brain Topogr2018; 31(6): 1047–1058.
36.
ChenYLiCShouG, et al.Assessing rTMS effects in MdDS: cross-modal comparison between resting state EEG and fMRI connectivity. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc2017; 2017: 1950–1953.
37.
ChaYHCuiYBalohRW. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for Mal de Debarquement Syndrome. Otol Neurotol2013; 34(1): 175–179.
38.
ChaYHGleghornDDoudicanB. Occipital and cerebellar theta burst stimulation for mal de debarquement syndrome. Otol Neurotol2019; 40(9): e928–e937.
39.
JohkuraKKudoYSugawaraE, et al.Effects of cerebellar magnetic stimulation on chronic post-lateral medullary infarction dizziness: a proof-of-principle cohort study. J Neurol Sci2018; 392: 56–62.
40.
KudoYSugawaraETakahashiK, et al.An attempt to treat ocular flutter and opsoclonus by cerebellar magnetic stimulation. J Neurol Sci2018; 395: 119–120.
41.
MasudaMGotoFHasegawaT, et al.Transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of vestibular decompensation. B-ENT2017; 13: 309–314.
42.
RizkHGVelozoCShahS, et al.Item level psychometrics of the dizziness handicap inventory in vestibular migraine and meniere’s disease. Ear Hear2024; 45(1): 106–114.
43.
TamberALWilhelmsenKTStrandLI. Measurement properties of the Dizziness Handicap Inventory by cross-sectional and longitudinal designs. Health Qual Life Outcome2009; 7(1): 101.
44.
WrisleyDMStephensMJMosleyS, et al.Learning effects of repetitive administrations of the sensory organization test in healthy young adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2007; 88(8): 1049–1054.
45.
LemayKRTullochHEPipeAL, et al.Establishing the minimal clinically important difference for the hospital anxiety and depression scale in patients with cardiovascular disease. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev2019; 39(6): E6–E11.
46.
MucciVIndovinaIBrowneCJ, et al.Mal de Debarquement Syndrome: A matter of loops?Front Neurol2020; 11: 576860.
47.
ChaYHChakrapaniSCraigA, et al.Metabolic and functional connectivity changes in Mal de Debarquement Syndrome. PLoS One2012; 7(11): e49560.
48.
FitzgeraldPB. An update on the clinical use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of depression. J Affect Disord2020; 276: 90–103.
49.
FernandezLMajorBPTeoWP, et al.Assessing Cerebellar Brain Inhibition (CBI) via Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS): a systematic review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev2018; 86: 176–206.
50.
RodriguesPAZaninottoALNevilleIS, et al.Transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of anxiety disorder. NDT2019; 15: 2743–2761.
51.
ArvanitiCKBrotisAGPaschalisT, et al.Localization of vestibular cortex using electrical cortical stimulation: a systematic literature review. Brain Sci2024; 14(1): 75.
52.
SharmaHVishnuVYKumarN, et al.Efficacy of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in ischemic stroke: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl2020; 2(1): 100039.
53.
LiuYMaYZhangJ, et al.Effects of non-invasive brain stimulation on hereditary ataxia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cerebellum2023; 23(4): 1614–1625.
54.
LefaucheurJPAlemanABaekenC, et al.Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS): an update (2014–2018). Clin Neurophysiol2020; 131(2): 474–528.
55.
KangNLeeRDLeeJH, et al.Functional balance and postural control improvements in patients with stroke after noninvasive brain stimulation: a meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2020; 101(1): 141–153.
56.
BoscoGCarrozzoMLacquanitiF. Contributions of the human temporoparietal junction and MT/V5+ to the timing of interception revealed by transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Neurosci2008; 28(46): 12071–12084.
57.
KheradmandALaskerAZeeDS. Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) of the supramarginal gyrus: a window to perception of upright. Cerebr Cortex2015; 25(3): 765–771.
58.
TarnutzerAALaskerAGZeeDS. Continuous theta-burst stimulation of the right superior temporal gyrus impairs self-motion perception. Exp Brain Res2013; 230(3): 359–370.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
