The vestibular implant is an experimental device that may provide treatment to patients suffering from bilateral vestibulopathy who do not benefit from standard vestibular rehabilitation.
Objective
The objective is to identify the various methodology regarding device designs and surgical approaches in addition to assessing subjective and objective vestibular and clinical outcomes in order to evaluate the future and possible limitations of the vestibular implant.
Methods
A systematic search of Medline and Embase was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines using pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. 350 hits were found, which after 2 rounds of screening by 2 independent reviewers resulted in 21 studies eligible for full-text review.
Results
A total of 36 recipients of a vestibular implant across four centres world-wide were identified. Both surgical approach and devices as well as vestibular and functional outcomes varied greatly across centres and from patient to patient, evaluated using a variety of objective and subjective tests.
Conclusion
Several promising results in vestibular implantation were found using both subjective and objective measurements. However, some questions with regards to hearing preservation and long-term, continuous use of the vestibular implant remain to be answered, and more studies are needed to assess the efficacy and cost-utility of the implant.
Ward BKDSCCAgrawalYHoffmanHJ, et al.Prevalence and impact of bilateral vestibular deficiency (BVD): results from the 2008 United States national health interview survey. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg2013; 139: 803–810.
2.
SunDQWardBKSemenovYR, et al.Bilateral vestibular deficiency: quality of life and economic implications. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg2014; 140: 527–534.
3.
GuinandNBoselieFGuyotJP, et al.Quality of life of patients with bilateral vestibulopathy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol2012; 121: 471–477.
4.
GuittonDKearneyREWereleyN, et al.Visual, vestibular and voluntary contributions to human head stabilization. Exp Brain Res1986; 64: 59–69.
5.
HainTC. Neurophysiology of vestibular rehabilitation. NeuroRehabilitation2011; 29: 127–141.
6.
IsraelIBerthozA. Contribution of the otoliths to the calculation of linear displacement. J Neurophysiol1989; 62: 247–263.
7.
StruppMKimJSMurofushiT, et al.Bilateral vestibulopathy: diagnostic criteria consensus document of the classification committee of the barany society. J Vestib Res2017; 27: 177–189.
8.
KimJSKimHJ. Bilateral vestibulopathy: the causes, diagnosis, and treatments. Curr Opin Neurol2022; 35: 98–106.
9.
StarkovDStruppMPleshkovM, et al.Diagnosing vestibular hypofunction: an update. J Neurol2021; 268: 377–385.
10.
KrebsDEGill-BodyKMParkerSW, et al.Vestibular rehabilitation: useful but not universally so, Otolaryngology. Head Neck Surg2003; 128: 240–250.
11.
ZinglerVCWeintzEJahnK, et al.Follow-up of vestibular function in bilateral vestibulopathy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry2008; 79: 284–288.
12.
FornosAPCavuscensSRanieriM, et al.The vestibular implant: a probe in orbit around the human balance system. J Vestib Res2017; 27: 51–61.
13.
StultiensJJALewisRFPhillipsJO, et al.The next challenges of vestibular implantation in humans. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol2023; 24: 401–412.
14.
MoherDLiberatiATetzlaffJ, et al.Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (reprinted from annals of internal medicine). Phys Ther2009; 89: 873–880.
15.
van de BergRGuinandNKhoa NguyenTA, et al.The vestibular implant: frequency-dependency of the electrically evoked vestibulo-ocular reflex in humans. Front Syst Neurosci2015; 8: 1–12.
16.
van de BergRGuinandNRanieriM, et al.The vestibular implant input interacts with residual natural function. Front Neurol2017; 8: 644.
17.
BoutablaACavuscensSRanieriM, et al.Simultaneous activation of multiple vestibular pathways upon electrical stimulation of semicircular canal afferents. J Neurol2020; 267: 273–284.
ChowMRAyiotisAISchooDP, et al.Posture, gait, quality of life, and hearing with a vestibular implant. N Engl J Med2021; 384: 521–532.
20.
FornosAPvan de BergRArmandS, et al.Cervical myogenic potentials and controlled postural responses elicited by a prototype vestibular implant. J Neurol2019; 266: 33–41.
21.
FornosAPGuinandNVan De BergR, et al.Artificial balance: restoration of the vestibulo-ocular reflex in humans with a prototype vestibular neuroprosthesis. Front Neurol2014; 5: 66.
22.
GuinandNVan de BergRCavuscensS, et al.The video head impulse test to assess the efficacy of vestibular implants in humans. Front Neurol2017; 8: 600.
23.
GuinandNVan de BergRCavuscensS, et al.Restoring visual acuity in dynamic conditions with a vestibular implant. Front Neurosci2016; 10: 1–6.
24.
GuinandNVan De BergRCavuscensS, et al.Vestibular implants: 8 Years of experience with electrical stimulation of the vestibular nerve in 11 patients with bilateral vestibular loss. Orl2015; 77: 227–240.
25.
GuyotJPSigristAPelizzoneM, et al.Adaptation to steady-state electrical stimulation of the vestibular system in humans. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol2011; 120: 143–149.
26.
MaciasARDe MiguelARMontesdeocaIR, et al.Chronic electrical stimulation of the otolith organ: preliminary results in humans with bilateral vestibulopathy and sensorineural hearing loss. Audiol Neurotol2020; 25: 79–90.
27.
NguyenTAKDigiovannaJCavuscensS, et al.Characterization of pulse amplitude and pulse rate modulation for a human vestibular implant during acute electrical stimulation. J Neural Eng2016; 13: 046023.
28.
PhillipsJOLingLNieK, et al.Vestibular implantation and longitudinal electrical stimulation of the semicircular canal afferents in human subjects. J Neurophysiol2015; 113: 3866–3892.
29.
PhillipsJOLingLNowackA, et al.Interactions between auditory and vestibular modalities during stimulation with a combined vestibular and cochlear prosthesis. Audiol Neurootol2020; 25: 96–108.
30.
Rodriguez MontesdeocaIRamos de MiguelAGonzálezJCF, et al.Differences in vestibular-evoked myogenic potential responses by using cochlear implant and otolith organ direct stimulation. Front Neurol2021; 12: 663803.
31.
Rodríguez-MontesdeocaIde MiguelÁRFalcón-GonzálezJC, et al.Dynamic visual acuity results in otolith electrical stimulation in bilateral vestibular dysfunction. J Clin Med2022; 11: 5706.
32.
RubinsteinJTLingLNowackA, et al.Results from a second-generation vestibular implant in human subjects: diagnosis may impact electrical sensitivity of vestibular afferents. Otol Neurotol2020; 41: 68–77.
33.
SchooDPAyiotisAIFernandez BrilletC, et al.Vestibular implantation can work even after more than 20 Years of bilateral vestibular hypofunction. Otol Neurotol2023; 44: 168–171.
34.
StarkovDGuinandNLucieerF, et al.Restoring the high-frequency dynamic visual acuity with a vestibular implant prototype in humans. Audiol Neurootol2020; 25: 91–95.
35.
StarkovDPleshkovMGuinandN, et al.Optimized signal analysis to quantify the non-linear behaviour of the electrically evoked vestibulo-ocular reflex in patients with a vestibular implant. Audiol Neurootol2022; 27: 458–468.
36.
VermorkenBLVolpeBVan BoxelSCJ, et al.The VertiGO! Trial protocol: a prospective, single-center, patient-blinded study to evaluate efficacy and safety of prolonged daily stimulation with a multichannel vestibulocochlear implant prototype in bilateral vestibulopathy patients. PLoS One2024; 19: 1–22.
37.
van de BergRGuinandNGuyotJP, et al.The modified ampullar approach for vestibular implant surgery: feasibility and its first application in a human with a long-term vestibular loss. Front Neurol2012; 3: 18.
38.
LucieerFVonkPGuinandN, et al.Bilateral vestibular hypofunction: insights in etiologies, clinical subtypes, and diagnostics. Front Neurol2016; 7: 1–11.
39.
MoyaertJDobbelsBPeetermansO, et al.Etiologies and hearing status in bilateral vestibulopathy: a retrospective study of 315 patients. Front Neurol2023; 14: 1271012.
40.
SotoEPliegoAVegaR. Vestibular prosthesis: from basic research to clinics. Front Integr Neurosci2023; 17: 1–11.
41.
CurthoysISSmithPFDe MiguelAR. Why should constant stimulation of saccular afferents modify the posture and gait of patients with bilateral vestibular dysfunction? The saccular substitution hypothesis. J Clin Med2022; 11: 1132.
