The eighteenth century witnessed an intense drive to classify diseases as natural kinds. Together with Linné, Macbride, Cullen, Sagar and Vogel, François Boissier de Sauvages, Professor of Medicine at Montpellier, was an important player in this process. In his monumental Nosologie Méthodique, Sauvages based his nosological system on the more botanico view proposed by Thomas Sydenham, namely, that human diseases (including mental ailments) should be classified in the same way as were plants. Classic Text No. 104 is an abridged translation of the Preliminary Discourse to the Nosologie Méthodique.
BerriosGE (1999) Classifications in psychiatry: a conceptual history. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry33: 145–160.
2.
Boissier de SauvagesF (1731) Nouvelles Classes de Maladies dans un Ordre semblables à celui de Botanistes, comprenant les Genres et les Espéces de toutes les Maladies, avec leurs Signes et leur Indications. Avignon: D’Avanville.
3.
Boissier de SauvagesF (1763) Nosologia methodica sistens morborum classes, genera et species juxta Sydenhaim mentem et botanicorum ordinem. Amsterdam: Fratrum de Tournes.
4.
Boissier de SauvagesF (1772) Nosologie Méthodique, ou distribution des maladies en classes, en genres et en especes, suivant l’esprit de Sydenham, et la méthode des botanistes, 12 vols. Lyon: Jean-Marie Bruyset; translation of Nosologia by GouvionM.
5.
ColinA (1969) François Boissier de sauvages. Revue d’histoire des sciences et de leurs applications22(4): 303–322.
6.
DewhurstK (1966) Dr Thomas Sydenham (1624–1689). London: Wellcome Trust Centre for the History of Medicine.
7.
DulieuL (1969) Françoise Boissier de Sauvages (1706–1767)Revue d’histoire des sciences et de leurs applications22: 303–322.
8.
DulieuL (1970) Bordeu, Théophile de. In: GillispieCC (ed.) Dictionary of Scientific Biography, Vol 2. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 301–302.
9.
DurisP (1993) Linné et la France (1780–1850). Paris: Droz.
10.
Fischer-HombergerE (1970) Eighteenth-century nosology and its survivors. Medical History14(4): 397–403.
11.
HaasF J (1864) Essai sur les avantages cliniques de la Doctrine de Montpellier. Paris: Baillière.
12.
HessV (2014) Sauvages’ paperwork: how disease classification arose from scholarly note-taking. Early Science and Medicine19: 471–503.
13.
HunemanP (2008) Montpellier vitalism and the emergence of alienism in France (1750–1800): the case of the passions. Science in Context21(4): 615–647.
14.
KingLS (1966) Boissier de Sauvages and 18th century nosology. Bulletin of the History of Medicine40(1): 43–51.
15.
LemoineA (1864) Le Vitalisme et l’Animisme de Stahl. Paris: Ballière.
16.
LindrothS (1973) Linnaeus. In: GillispieCC (ed.) Dictionary of Scientific Biography, Vol 8. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 374–381.
17.
MartinJ (1990) Sauvages’s nosology: medical enlightenment in Montpellier. In: CunninghamAFrenchR (eds) The Medical Enlightenment of the Eighteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 111–137.
18.
Michaud [no initial] (1843) Biographie Universelle, New Edition, Vol 38. Paris: Madame C Desplaces, 85–87.
19.
MoraviaS (1978) From ‘Homme Machine’ to ‘Homme Sensible’: changing eighteenth-century models of man’s image. Journal of the History of Ideas39(1): 45–60.
20.
MunscheHWhitakerHA (2012) Eighteenth century classification of mental illness: Linnaeus, de Sauvages, Vogel, and Cullen. Cognitive Behavioral Neurology25(4): 224–239.
21.
WilliamsEA (2003) A Cultural History of Medical Vitalism in EnlightenmentMontpellier. Aldershot: Ashgate.
