Locke is famous for defining madness as an intellectual disorder in the realm of ideas. Numerous commentators take this to be his main and only contribution to the history of psychiatry. However, a detailed exegetical review of all the relevant textual evidence suggests that this intellectualist interpretation of Locke’s account of madness is both misleading and incomplete. Affective states of various sorts play an important role in that account and are in fact primordial in the determination of human conduct generally. Locke’s legacy in this domain must therefore be revised and the intellectualist bias that dominates discussions of his views must be redressed.
BalibarÉ (1998) John Locke: Identité et différence, L’invention de la conscience. Presenté, traduit, et commenté par Étienne Balibar (Bilingue Anglais-Français). Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
2.
BanTA (1964) Conditioning and Psychiatry. Chicago, IL: Aldine Pub. Co.
3.
BerriosGE (1985) The psychopathology of affectivity: conceptual and historical aspects. Psychological Medicine15(4): 745–758.
4.
BerriosGE (1996) The History of Mental Symptoms: Descriptive Psychopathology since the 19th Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5.
DewhurstK (1963) John Locke, 1632–1704, Physician and Philosopher. London: Wellcome Historical Medical Library.
6.
DixonT (2003) From Passion to Emotion: The Creation of a Secular Category. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
DixonT (2012) “Emotion”: the history of a key word in crisis. Emotion Review4(4): 338–344.
8.
DonnellyM (1983) Managing the Mind: A Medical British Psychology in Early Nineteenth-Century Britain. London: Tavistock Publications.
9.
GauchetMSwainG (1980) La pratique de l’esprit humain: l’institution asilaire et la révolution démocratique. Paris: Gallimard.
10.
GoldsteinJE (2001) Console and Classify: The French Psychiatric Profession in the Nineteenth Century, 2nd edn.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11.
GoodeyCF (1994) John Locke’s idiots in the natural history of mind. History of Psychiatry5: 215–250.
HunterRMacalpineI (1982) Three Hundred Years of Psychiatry: 1535–1860. Hartsdale, NY: Carlisle Publishing Incorporated.
14.
LaslettP (1998) Locke: Two Treatises of Government, eds GeussRSkinnerQ, 3rd edn.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought).
15.
LockeJ (1689) An Essay concerning Human Understanding, ed. NidditchPH. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979.
LockeJ (1735) Essai philosophique concernant l’entendement humain, où l’on montre quelle est l’étendue de nos connoissances … par M. Locke, traduit de l’anglois par M. Coste. Troisième édition, revue, corrigée et augmentée de quelques additions importantes de l’auteur qui n’ont paru qu’après sa mort, et de quelques remarques du traducteur. Amsterdam: John P. Mortier. Accessed online (31 Jan. 2014) at: http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k54249426.r=.langFR
20.
PinelP (1809) Traité médico-philosophique sur l’aliénation mentale, Seconde édition, entièrement refondue et très-augmentée. Paris: Chez J. Ant. Brosson.
21.
PorterR (1987) Mind-forg’d Manacles: A History of Madness in England from the Restoration to the Regency. London: Athlone.
22.
RapaportD (1974) The History of the Concept of Association of Ideas. New York: International Universities Press.
23.
RibotT (1907) Essai sur les passions. Paris: l’Harmattan.
24.
RieseW (1969) The Legacy of Philippe Pinel: An Inquiry into Thought on Mental Alienation. New York: Springer.
25.
RoinilaM (2011) Uneasiness and passions in Leibniz’s Nouveaux essais II, xx. In: HerbertBJürgenHSvenE (eds) Natur und Subjekt. IX. Internationaler Leibniz-Kongress Vorträge 3. Teil. Hannover: Leibniz Geschellschaft, 937–946.
26.
SanchezG (1990) Medicine in John Locke’s philosophy. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy15(6): 675–695.
27.
ScullAT (1993) The Most Solitary of Afflictions: Madness and Society in Britain 1700–1900. New Haven & London: Yale University Press.
28.
SkultansV (1979) English Madness: Ideas on Insanity 1580–1890. London: Routledge.
29.
TukeS (1813) Description of the Retreat. With an introduction by Richard Hunter & Ida Macalpine (1964 Ed.) and a Forward by Kathleen Jones (1966 Ed.). London: Process Press.
30.
WalkerC (1991) What did Jasper’s really say?British Journal of Psychiatry (Supplement) 14(Nov.): 94–103.
31.
WebbTE (1857) The Intellectualism of Locke: An Essay. Dublin: William McGee & Company.
