Researchers have long debated whether self-esteem is associated with aggression. In this preregistered research, we tested the effects of self-esteem on aggression by using statistical models that control for unmeasured time-invariant confounders. Data came from a multi-wave longitudinal study of 674 Mexican-origin families, including multi-informant assessments of children, mothers, and fathers at 1- or 2-year intervals. There was no evidence of systematic self-esteem effects on aggression, and the results held when we controlled for narcissism and when the influence of shared-method variance could be ruled out. Also, there was little evidence for effects in the reverse direction, that is, from engaging in aggression on self-esteem. One limitation was that in most cases it was not possible to test whether the self-esteem effects were curvilinear because of the nonconvergence of these models. Overall, the findings do not support either low or high self-esteem as a risk factor for aggression.
AckermanR. A.WittE. A.DonnellanM. B.TrzesniewskiK. H.RobinsR. W.KashyD. A. (2011). What does the Narcissistic Personality Inventory really measure?Assessment, 18(1), 67–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191110382845
2.
AizpitarteA.AthertonO. E.ZhengL. R.Alonso-ArbiolI.RobinsR. W. (2019). Developmental precursors of relational aggression from late childhood through adolescence. Child Development, 90(1), 117–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13166
3.
AllisonP. D.WilliamsR.Moral-BenitoE. (2017). Maximum likelihood for cross-lagged panel models with fixed effects. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 3, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023117710578
4.
AndersenH. K. (2022). Equivalent approaches to dealing with unobserved heterogeneity in cross-lagged panel models? Investigating the benefits and drawbacks of the latent curve model with structured residuals and the random intercept cross-lagged panel model. Psychological Methods, 27(5), 730–751. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000285
5.
AngR. P.RaineA. (2009). Reliability, validity and invariance of the Narcissistic Personality Questionnaire for Children-Revised (NPQC-R). Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 31(3), 143–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-008-9112-2
6.
BackM. D.MorfC. C. (2018). Narcissism. In Zeigler-HillV.ShackelfordT. K. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of personality and individual differences (pp. 1–9). Springer.
7.
BaileyD. H.HübnerN.ZitzmannS.HechtM.MurayamaK. (2026). Illusory traits: Wrong but sometimes useful. Psychological Review, 133(1), 173–186. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000522
8.
BaumeisterR. F.SmartL.BodenJ. M. (1996). Relation of threatened egotism to violence and aggression: The dark side of high self-esteem. Psychological Review, 103(1), 5–33. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.103.1.5
9.
BodenJ. M.FergussonD. M.HorwoodL. J. (2007). Self-esteem and violence: Testing links between adolescent self-esteem and later hostility and violent behavior. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 42(11), 881–891. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-007-0251-7
10.
BushmanB. J.BaumeisterR. F. (1998). Threatened egotism, narcissism, self-esteem, and direct and displaced aggression: Does self-love or self-hate lead to violence?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 219–229. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.219
CongerR. D.LasleyP.LorenzF. O.SimonsR.WhitbeckL. B.ElderG. H.NoremR. (2011). Iowa Youth and Families Project, 1989-1992 [Data file and codebook]. Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR26721.v2
13.
CroweM. L.LynamD. R.CampbellW. K.MillerJ. D. (2019). Exploring the structure of narcissism: Toward an integrated solution. Journal of Personality, 87(6), 1151–1169. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12464
14.
De Los ReyesA.AugensteinT. M.WangM.ThomasS. A.DrabickD. A. G.BurgersD. E.RabinowitzJ. (2015). The validity of the multi-informant approach to assessing child and adolescent mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 141(4), 858–900. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038498
15.
DonnellanM. B.TrzesniewskiK. H.RobinsR. W. (2015). Measures of self-esteem. In BoyleG. J.SaklofskeD. H.MatthewsG. (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological constructs (pp. 131–157). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-386915-9.00006-1
16.
DonnellanM. B.TrzesniewskiK. H.RobinsR. W.MoffittT. E.CaspiA. (2005). Low self-esteem is related to aggression, antisocial behavior, and delinquency. Psychological Science, 16(4), 328–335. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01535.x
17.
DriverC. C.VoelkleM. C. (2018). Hierarchical Bayesian continuous time dynamic modeling. Psychological Methods, 23(4), 774–799. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000168
18.
EllisL. K.RothbartM. K. (2001). Revision of the early adolescent temperament questionnaire. Poster presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Minneapolis, MN.
19.
FunderD. C.OzerD. J. (2019). Evaluating effect size in psychological research: Sense and nonsense. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919847202
20.
HamakerE. L.KuiperR. M.GrasmanR. P. P. P. (2015). A critique of the cross-lagged panel model. Psychological Methods, 20(1), 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038889
21.
HenryD. B., & The Metropolitan Area Child Study Research Group. (2006). Associations between peer nominations, teacher ratings, self-reports, and observations of malicious and disruptive behavior. Assessment, 13(3), 241–252. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191106287668
22.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
23.
HyattC. S.SleepC. E.LamkinJ.Maples-KellerJ. L.SedikidesC.CampbellW. K.MillerJ. D. (2018). Narcissism and self-esteem: A nomological network analysis. PLOS ONE, 13(8), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201088
24.
KraussS.OrthU.RobinsR. W. (2020). Family environment and self-esteem development: A longitudinal study from age 10 to 16. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119(2), 457–478. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000263
25.
LakensD. (2017). Equivalence tests: A practical primer for t tests, correlations, and meta-analyses. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 355–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617697177
26.
LawsonK. M.RobinsR. W. (2021). Sibling constructs: What are they, why do they matter, and how should you handle them?Personality and Social Psychology Review, 25(4), 344–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/10888683211047101
27.
LeiH.MaoW.CheongC. M.WenY.CuiY.CaiZ. (2020). The relationship between self-esteem and cyberbullying: A meta-analysis of children and youth students. Current Psychology, 39(3), 830–842. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00407-6
28.
LittleT. D.RhemtullaM.GibsonK.SchoemannA. M. (2013). Why the items versus parcels controversy needn’t be one. Psychological Methods, 18(3), 285–300. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033266
29.
LüdtkeO.RobitzschA. (2022). A comparison of different approaches for estimating cross-lagged effects from a causal inference perspective. Structural Equation Modeling, 29(6), 888–907. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2022.2065278
30.
McCarthyJ. D.HogeD. R. (1984). The dynamics of self-esteem and delinquency. American Journal of Sociology, 90(2), 396–410. https://doi.org/10.1086/228085
31.
MorehouseK. N.KurdiB.NosekB. A. (2025). Responsible data sharing: Identifying and remedying possible re-identification of human participants. American Psychologist, 80(6), 928–941. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001346
32.
MurayamaK.GfrörerT. (2025). Thinking clearly about time-invariant confounders in cross-lagged panel models: A guide for choosing a statistical model from a causal inference perspective. Psychological Methods, 30(6), 1311–1325. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000647
33.
MuthénB.AsparouhovT.WitkiewitzK. (2024). Cross-lagged panel modeling with binary and ordinal outcomes. Psychological Methods. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000701
34.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.).
35.
OrthU.ClarkD. A.DonnellanM. B.RobinsR. W. (2021). Testing prospective effects in longitudinal research: Comparing seven competing cross-lagged models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 120(4), 1013–1034. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000358
36.
OrthU.RobinsR. W.MeierL. L.CongerR. D. (2016). Refining the vulnerability model of low self-esteem and depression: Disentangling the effects of genuine self-esteem and narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(1), 133–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000038
37.
OrthU.RobinsR. W.WidamanK. F.CongerR. D. (2014). Is low self-esteem a risk factor for depression? Findings from a longitudinal study of Mexican-origin youth. Developmental Psychology, 50(2), 622–633. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033817
38.
OstrowskyM. K. (2010). Are violent people more likely to have low self-esteem or high self-esteem?Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15(1), 69–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2009.08.004
39.
PaulhusD. L.RobinsR. W.TrzesniewskiK. H.TracyJ. L. (2004). Two replicable suppressor situations in personality research. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(2), 303–328. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3902_7
40.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.PodsakoffN. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
41.
R Core Team. (2024). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org
42.
RevelleW. (2025). psych: Procedures for psychological, psychometric, and personality research. Northwestern University. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych
43.
RobitzschA.LüdtkeO. (2025). A note on the occurrence of the illusory between-person component in the random intercept cross-lagged panel model. Structural Equation Modeling, 32(1), 36–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2024.2379495
44.
RohrerJ. M. (2018). Thinking clearly about correlations and causation: Graphical causal models for observational data. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(1), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917745629
45.
RosenbergM. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton University Press.
46.
RosenbergM.SchoolerC.SchoenbachC. (1989). Self-esteem and adolescent problems: Modeling reciprocal effects. American Sociological Review, 54(6), 1004–1018. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095720
47.
SavaleiV.BraceJ. C.FouladiR. T. (2024). We need to change how we compute RMSEA for nested model comparisons in structural equation modeling. Psychological Methods, 29(3), 480–493. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000537
SchmittN.KuljaninG. (2008). Measurement invariance: Review of practice and implications. Human Resource Management Review, 18(4), 210–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2008.03.003
50.
ShafferD.FisherP.LucasC. P.DulcanM. K.Schwab-StoneM. E. (2000). NIMH Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children Version IV (NIMH DISC-IV): Description, differences from previous versions, and reliability of some common diagnoses. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 39(1), 28–38. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-200001000-00014
51.
TengZ.LiuY.GuoC. (2015). A meta-analysis of the relationship between self-esteem and aggression among Chinese students. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 21, 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2015.01.005
52.
TracyJ. L.RobinsR. W. (2003). “Death of a (narcissistic)salesman:” An integrative model of fragile self-esteem. Psychological Inquiry, 14(1), 57–62. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1401_02
53.
TrzesniewskiK. H.DonnellanM. B.MoffittT. E.RobinsR. W.PoultonR.CaspiA. (2006). Low self-esteem during adolescence predicts poor health, criminal behavior, and limited economic prospects during adulthood. Developmental Psychology, 42(2), 381–390. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.42.2.381
54.
WebsterG. D. (2006). Low self-esteem is related to aggression, but especially when controlling for gender: A replication and extension of Donnellan et al. (2005). Representative Research in Social Psychology, 29, 12–18.
55.
WebsterG. D. (2007). Is the relationship between self-esteem and physical aggression necessarily U-shaped?Journal of Research in Personality, 41(4), 977–982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2007.01.001
56.
WebsterG. D.KirkpatrickL. A. (2006). Behavioral and self-reported aggression as a function of domain-specific self-esteem. Aggressive Behavior, 32(1), 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20102
57.
WeidmannR.AthertonO. E.RobinsR. W. (2024). Bidirectional associations between self-esteem and relational aggression from 5th to 11th grade. European Journal of Personality, 38(2), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/08902070221141581
58.
WetzelE.AthertonO. E.RobinsR. W. (2021). Investigating the link between narcissism and problem behaviors in adolescence. Self and Identity, 20(2), 268–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2019.1609573
59.
Zeigler-HillV.HoldenC. J.SouthardA. C.NoserA. E.EnjaianB.PollockN. C. (2016). The dark sides of high and low self-esteem. In Zeigler-HillV.MarcusD. K. (Eds.), The dark side of personality: Science and practice in social, personality, and clinical psychology (pp. 325–340). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14854-017
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
