The Rise,Impact,and Imbalances of Big-Team Psychology

Abstract

The present work evaluates the rise, impact, and imbalances of big-team psychology via an analysis of 3,023,895 articles published in the 21st century. Results indicate that big teams—ranging from 10 to more than 100 authors—are relatively unusual (n = 49,695) but increasing in popularity. More notably, such collaborations generate unusually high impact in terms of yearly mentions in scholarly articles (n = 39,788,158), the news (n = 1,018,639), social media (n = 5,971,965), and policy documents (n = 69,959). An examination of country-level sociocultural indicators revealed that first authors, in general, tend to be in regions that are relatively WEIRD: Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic. However, this imbalance is slightly more pronounced among larger teams. In summary, results suggest that big-team science is an emerging trend in psychology—one that is unevenly deployed across world regions to generate high-impact scientific insights.

Keywords

team science big-team science collaboration collective intelligence metascience WEIRD

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aad

Abajyan

Abbott

Abdallah

Abdel Khalek

Abdelalim

A. A.

Abdinov

Aben

Abi

Abolins

AbouZeid

O. S.

Abramowicz

Abreu

Acharya

B. S.

Adamczyk

Adams

D. L.

Addy

T. N.

Adelman

Adomeit

. . .Zwalinski

(2012). Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC. Physics Letters B, 716(1), 1–29.

Akiyama

Alberdi

Alef

Algaba

J. C.

Anantua

Asada

Azulay

Bach

Baczko

A.-K.

Ball

Baloković

Barrett

Bauböck

Benson

B. A.

Bintley

Blackburn

Blundell

Bouman

K. L.

Bower

G. C.

. . .Zeballos

(2022). First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope results. I. The shadow of the supermassive black hole in the center of the Milky Way. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 930(2), L12.

Aksnes

D. W.

(2003). A macro study of self-citation. Scientometrics, 56, 235–246.

Allen

Scott

Brand

Hlava

Altman

(2014). Publishing: Credit where credit is due. Nature, 508(7496), 312–313.

Baumgartner

H. A.

Alessandroni

Byers-Heinlein

Frank

M. C.

Hamlin

J. K.

Soderstrom

Voelkel

J. G.

Willer

Yuen

Coles

N. A.

(2023). How to build up big team science: A practical guide for large-scale collaborations. Royal Society Open Science, 10(6), Article 230235.

Bindra

Sharma

Parameswar

Dhir

Paul

(2022). Bandwagon effect revisited: A systematic review to develop future research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 143, 305–317.

Buchanan

E. M.

Lewis

S. C.

(2023). Who does big team science? PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/hqta4

Christian

Adie

Derrick

Didegah

Groth

Neylon

Priem

Zahedi

Theng

Y.-L.

Hassan

S.-U.

Aljohani

N. R.

Bowen

T. D.

Patel

V. M.

Haunschild

Bornmann

Taylor

Ross

Konkiel

(2020). The state of altmetrics: A tenth anniversary celebration. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.13010000

Coles

N. A.

(2024). The prevalence, impact, and disruptiveness of big team science. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/q68yv

10.

Coles

N. A.

DeBruine

L. M.

Azevedo

Baumgartner

H. A.

Frank

M. C.

(2023). ‘Big team’science challenges us to reconsider authorship. Nature Human Behaviour, 7(5), 665–667.

11.

Coles

N. A.

Hamlin

J. K.

Sullivan

L. L.

Parker

T. H.

Altschul

(2022). Build up big-team science. Nature, 601(7894), 505–507.

12.

Coles

N. A.

March

D. S.

Marmolejo-Ramos

Larsen

J. T.

Arinze

N. C.

Ndukaihe

I. L. G.

Willis

M. L.

Foroni

Reggev

Mokady

Forscher

P. S.

Hunter

J. F.

Kaminski

Yüvrük

Kapucu

Nagy

Hajdu

Tejada

Freitag

R. M. K.

. . . Liuzza

M. T.

(2022). A multi-lab test of the facial feedback hypothesis by the Many Smiles Collaboration. Nature Human Behaviour, 6(12), 1731–1742.

13.

Coles

N. A.

Tenney

E. R.

Chin

J. M.

Friedrich

J. C.

O’Dea

R. E.

Holcombe

A. O.

(2024). Team scientists should normalize disagreement. Science, 384(6700), 1076–1077.

14.

De Peuter

Reck

Bellekens

Storms

. (2024). Gift and ghost authorship and the use of authorship guidelines in psychology journals: A cross-sectional survey. Research Ethics, 21(3), 408–424. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161241262244

15.

Economist Intelligence Unit (2025). Democracy index [Data set]. Our World in Data. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/democracy-index-eiu

16.

Forscher

P. S.

Wagenmakers

E. J.

Coles

N. A.

Silan

M. A.

Dutra

Basnight-Brown

IJzerman

(2023). The benefits, barriers, and risks of big-team science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 18(3), 607–623.

17.

Galton

(1907). Wisdom of the crowd. Nature, 1949(75), 450–451.

18.

Garg

Anzuoni

Landyn

Hajduk

Waring

Hanson

L. R.

Whitson

H. E.

(2018). The AGING Initiative experience: A call for sustained support for team science networks. Health Research Policy and Systems, 16, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0324-y

19.

Graves

J. L.

Jr. Kearney

Barabino

Malcom

(2022). Inequality in science and the case for a new agenda. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(10), Article e2117831119.

20.

Hall

K. L.

Vogel

A. L.

Huang

G. C.

Serrano

K. J.

Rice

E. L.

Tsakraklides

S. P.

Fiore

S. M.

(2018). The science of team science: A review of the empirical evidence and research gaps on collaboration in science. American Psychologist, 73(4), 532–548.

21.

Henrich

Heine

S. J.

Norenzayan

(2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 61–83.

22.

Henrich

Muthukrishna

(2021). The origins and psychology of human cooperation. Annual Review of Psychology, 72(1), 207–240.

23.

Hsiehchen

Espinoza

Hsieh

(2015). Multinational teams and diseconomies of scale in collaborative research. Science Advances, 1(8), e1500211.

24.

Larsen

Von Ins

(2010). The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index. Scientometrics, 84(3), 575–603.

25.

Leskovec

Rajaraman

Ullman

J. D.

(2020). Mining of massive data sets. Cambridge University Press.

26.

Lin

Frey

C. B.

(2023). Remote collaboration fuses fewer breakthrough ideas. Nature, 623(7989), 987–991.

27.

Mulgan

(2017). Big mind: How collective intelligence can change our world. Princeton University Press.

28.

National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (NCSES). 2025. Survey of Doctorate Recipients: 2023. NSF 25-321. National Science Foundation. https://ncses.nsf.gov/surveys/doctorate-recipients/2023

29.

Nosek

B. A.

Spies

J. R.

Motyl

(2012). Scientific utopia: II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 615–631.

30.

Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), Article aac4716.

31.

Priem

Piwowar

Orr

(2022). OpenAlex: A fully-open index of scholarly works, authors, venues, institutions, and concepts. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2205.01833

32.

Rohrer

J. M.

(2018). Thinking clearly about correlations and causation: Graphical causal models for observational data. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(1), 27–42.

33.

Salganik

M. J.

Lundberg

Kindel

A. T.

Ahearn

C. E.

Al-Ghoneim

Almaatouq

Altschul

D. M.

Brand

J. E.

Carnegie

N. B.

Compton

R. J.

Datta

Davidson

Filippova

Gilroy

Goode

B. J.

Jahani

Kashyap

Kirchner

McKay

. . . McLanahan

(2020). Measuring the predictability of life outcomes with a scientific mass collaboration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(15), 8398–8403.

34.

Tiokhin

Panchanathan

Smaldino

P. E.

Lakens

(2024). Shifting the level of selection in science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 19(6), 908–920.

35.

Turchin

Currie

T. E.

Whitehouse

François

Feeney

Mullins

Hoyer

Collins

Grohmann

Savage

Mendel-Gleason

Turner

Dupeyron

Cioni

Reddish

Levine

Jordan

Brandl

Williams

. . . Spencer

(2018). Quantitative historical analysis uncovers a single dimension of complexity that structures global variation in human social organization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(2), E144–E151.

36.

UNESCO Institute for Statistics. (2025). School enrollment, secondary (% gross) [Data set]. World Bank. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SE.SEC.ENRR

37.

Uzzi

Mukherjee

Stringer

Jones

(2013). Atypical combinations and scientific impact. Science, 342(6157), 468–472.

38.

Venter

J. C.

Adams

M. D.

Myers

E. W.

P. W.

Mural

R. J.

Sutton

G. G.

Smith

H. O.

Yandell

Evans

C. A.

Holt

R. A.

Gocayne

J. D.

Amanatides

Ballew

R. M.

Huson

D. H.

Wortman

J. R.

Zhang

Kodira

C. D.

Zheng

X. H.

Chen

. . . Zhu

(2001). The sequence of the human genome. Science, 291(5507), 1304–1351.

39.

Weitzman

M. L.

(1998). Recombinant growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(2), 331–360.

40.

World Bank. (2025). World Development Indicators [Data set]. World Bank. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators

41.

Wuchty

Jones

B. F.

Uzzi

(2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036–1039.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.56 MB