Why Should You Trust Research Published in Psychological Science ?

Bauer P. J. (2022). Psychological science stepping up a level. Psychological Science, 33(2), 179–183.

Bauer P. J. (2024). Attention to authenticity: An essential analogue to focus on rigor and replicability. Psychological Science, 35(1), 3–6.

Campbell D. T. (1988). Can we be scientific in applied social science. In Overman E. S. (Ed.), Methodology and epistemology for social sciences: Selected papers (pp. 313–334). University of Chicago Press.

Eich E. (2014). Business not as usual. Psychological Science, 25(1), 3–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613512465

Hardwicke T. E. Szűcs D. Thibault R. T. Crüwell S. van den Akker O. R. Nuijten M. B. Ioannidis J. P. (2021). Citation patterns following a strongly contradictory replication result: Four case studies from psychology. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459211040837

Lindsay D. S. (2015). Replication in Psychological Science. Psychological Science, 26(12), 1827–1832. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615616374

Lindsay D. S. (2017). Sharing data and materials in Psychological Science. Psychological Science, 28(6), 699–702. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617704015

Lindsay D. S. (2019). Swan song editorial. Psychological Science, 30(12), 1669–1673. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619893653

Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Reproducibility Project: Psychology. OSF. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/EZCUJ

Shadish W. R. Cook T. D. Campbell D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.

Smith R. (2006). Peer review: A flawed process at the heart of science and journals. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 99(4), 178–182.

Vazire S. Holcombe A. O. (2022). Where are the self-correcting mechanisms in science? Review of General Psychology, 26(2), 212–223.

Vazire S. Schiavone S. R. Bottesini J. G. (2022). Credibility beyond replicability: Improving the four validities in psychological science. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 31(2), 162–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214211067779

Wager E. (1999). Rapid response: If peer review were a new drug, it would never be approved! BMJ, 318, Article 1637. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.318.7199.1637

Whamond A. Vazire S. Clarke B. Moodie N. Schiavone S. R. Thibault R. T. Hardwicke T. E. (2024). How do psychology journals handle post-publication critique? A cross-sectional study of policy and practice. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/eadhb