The study aimed to investigate the within-person relationship between religious-service attendance and mental health using data from the British Household Panel Survey (N = 29,298), a longitudinal survey of adult British households between 1991 and 2009. The outcome variables were mental health (as measured with the General Health Questionnaire) and life satisfaction. Using random-intercept cross-lagged panel models over 10 waves of data spanning over 18 years, the associations between religious-service attendance and mental health at the within-person level were mostly nonsignificant. The few significant findings indicated that an increase in religious-service attendance is associated subsequently with either higher or lower levels of mental health, suggesting both detrimental and beneficial effects. A series of robustness analyses (including the use of marginal structural models) mainly supported these findings. The results suggest that there is a need to question the assumption that religious-service attendance provides mental health benefits.
BalboniT. A.VanderWeeleT. J.Doan-SoaresS. D.LongK. N. G.FerrellB. R.FitchettG.KoenigH. G.BainP. A.PuchalskiC.SteinhauserK. E.SulmasyD. P.KohH. K. (2022). Spirituality in serious illness and health. JAMA, 328(2), 184–197. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2022.11086
2.
ChenF. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
3.
ChenY.KimE. S.VanderWeeleT. J. (2020). Religious-service attendance and subsequent health and well-being throughout adulthood: Evidence from three prospective cohorts. International Journal of Epidemiology, 49(6), 2030–2040. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyaa120
4.
CurranP. J.BauerD. J. (2010). The disaggregation of within-person and between-person effects in longitudinal models of change. Annual Review of Psychology, 62(1), 583–619. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100356
5.
EisingaR.GrotenhuisM.PelzerB. (2013). The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown?International Journal of Public Health, 58(4), 637–642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-012-0416-3
6.
EllisonC. G.FlannellyK. J. (2009). Religious involvement and risk of major depression in a prospective nationwide study of African American adults. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 197(8), 568–573. https://doi.org/10.1097/NMD.0b013e3181b08f45
7.
EllisonC. G.ZhangW.KrauseN.MarcumJ. P. (2009). Does negative interaction in the church increase psychological distress? Longitudinal findings from the Presbyterian Panel Survey. Sociology of Religion, 70(4), 409–431. https://doi.org/10.1093/socrel/srp062
8.
GarssenB.VisserA.PoolG. (2021). Does spirituality or religion positively affect mental health? Meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 31(1), 4–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2020.1729570
9.
GebauerJ. E.SedikidesC.NeberichW. (2012). Religiosity, social self-esteem, and psychological adjustment: On the cross-cultural specificity of the psychological benefits of religiosity. Psychological Science, 23(2), 158–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611427045
10.
GoldbergD. P.GaterR.SartoriusN.UstunT. B.PiccinelliM.GurejeO.RutterC. (1997). The validity of two versions of the GHQ in the WHO study of mental illness in general health care. Psychological Medicine, 27(1), 191–197. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291796004242
11.
HamakerE. L. (2023). The within-between dispute in cross-lagged panel research and how to move forward. Psychological Methods. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000600
12.
HamakerE. L.KuiperR. M.GrasmanR. P. P. P. (2015). A critique of the cross-lagged panel model. Psychological Methods, 20(1), 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038889
13.
HamakerE. L.MulderJ. D.van IJzendoornM. H. (2020). Description, prediction and causation: Methodological challenges of studying child and adolescent development. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 46, Article 100867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2020.100867
14.
JoinerR. J.MartinezB. S.NelsonN. A.BergemanC. S. (2022). Within-person changes in religiosity, control beliefs, and subjective well-being across middle and late adulthood. Psychology and Aging, 37(7), 848–862. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000713
15.
JoshanlooM. (2021). Within-person relationship between religiosity and life satisfaction: A 20-year study. Personality and Individual Differences, 179, Article 110933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110933
16.
JoshanlooM. (2022). Temporal associations between religiosity and subjective well-being in a nationally representative Australian sample. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 33(2), 107–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2022.2108257
17.
JoshanlooM. (2024). No evidence of longitudinal association between religiosity and psychological well-being: Challenging prevailing assumptions. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 18. https://doi.org/10.1177/18344909241262209
18.
JoshanlooM.GebauerJ. E. (2020). Religiosity’s nomological network and temporal change: Introducing an extensive country-level religiosity index based on Gallup World Poll data. European Psychologist, 25(1), 26–40. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000382
19.
KoenigH. G.KingD. E.CarsonV. B. (2012). Handbook of religion and health (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
20.
KrauseN.EllisonC. G.WulffK. M. (1998). Church-based support, negative interaction and psychological well-being: Findings from a national sample of Presbyterians. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 37(4), 725–741. https://doi.org/10.2307/1388153
21.
LawR. W.SbarraD. A. (2009). The effects of church attendance and marital status on the longitudinal trajectories of depressed mood among older adults. Journal of Aging and Health, 21(6), 803–823. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264309338300
22.
LiS.OkerekeO. I.ChangS.-C.KawachiI.VanderWeeleT. J. (2016). Religious service attendance and lower depression among women—a prospective cohort study. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 50(6), 876–884. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-016-9813-9
23.
LucasR. E. (2023). Why the cross-lagged panel model is almost never the right choice. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459231158378
24.
MoonJ. W.CohenA. B.LaurinK.MacKinnonD. P. (2022). Is religion special?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 18(2), 340–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916221100485
25.
MulderJ. D. (2023). Power analysis for the random intercept cross-lagged panel model using the powRICLPM R-package. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 30(4), 645–658. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2022.2122467
26.
MulderJ. D.LuijkenK.Penning de VriesB. B. L.HamakerE. L. (2024). Causal effects of time-varying exposures: A comparison of structural equation modeling and marginal structural models in cross-lagged panel research. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 31(4), 575–591. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2024.2316586
OmanD.SymeS. L. (2018). Weighing the evidence: What is revealed by 100+ meta-analyses and systematic reviews of religion/spirituality and health? In OmanD. (Ed.), Why religion and spirituality matter for public health: Evidence, implications, and resources (pp. 261–281). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73966-3_15
29.
PawlikowskiJ.BiałowolskiP.Węziak-BiałowolskaD.VanderWeeleT. J. (2019). Religious service attendance, health behaviors and well-being—an outcome-wide longitudinal analysis. European Journal of Public Health, 29(6), 1177–1183. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckz075
30.
PloyhartR. E.MacKenzieW. I. J. (2015). Two waves of measurement do not a longitudinal study make. In LanceC. E.VandenbergR. J. (Eds.), More statistical and methodological myths and urban legends (pp. 85–99). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428110391814
31.
PratiG. (2023). Religion and well-being: What is the magnitude and the practical significance of the relationship?Psychology of Religion and Spirituality. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000515
32.
PratiG. (2024). The reciprocal relationship between political participation and mental health in Germany: A random-intercept cross-lagged panel analysis. Social Science Quarterly, 105, 1751–1762. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13440
33.
RosmarinD. H.KoenigH. G. (2020). Handbook of spirituality, religion, and mental health (2nd ed.). Academic Press.
34.
SchiemanS.BiermanA.EllisonC. G. (2013). Religion and mental health. In AneshenselC. S.PhelanJ. C.BiermanA. (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of mental health (pp. 457–478). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4276-5_22
35.
ShevlinM.AdamsonG. (2005). Alternative factor models and factorial invariance of the GHQ-12: A large sample analysis using confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Assessment, 17(2), 231–236. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.17.2.231
StrawbridgeW. J.CohenR. D.ShemaS. J.KaplanG. A. (1997). Frequent attendance at religious services and mortality over 28 years. American Journal of Public Health, 87(6), 957–961. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.87.6.957
38.
StrawbridgeW. J.ShemaS. J.CohenR. D.KaplanG. A. (2001). Religious attendance increases survival by improving and maintaining good health behaviors, mental health, and social relationships. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 23(1), 68–74. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324796ABM2301_10
39.
TaylorM. F.BriceJ.BuckN.Prentice-LaneE. (2017). British Household Panel Survey user manual volume A: Introduction, technical report and appendices. University of Essex.
40.
TennantP. W. G.ArnoldK. F.EllisonG. T. H.GilthorpeM. S. (2022). Analyses of ‘change scores’ do not estimate causal effects in observational data. International Journal of Epidemiology, 51(5), 1604–1615. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyab050
41.
University of Essex, Institute for Social and Economic Research. (2023). Understanding Society: Waves 1-13, 2009-2022 and Harmonised BHPS: Waves 1-18, 1991-2009 (Study No. 6614; Version 18) [Data set]. UK Data Service. https://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-6614-19
42.
UsamiS.MurayamaK.HamakerE. L. (2019). A unified framework of longitudinal models to examine reciprocal relations. Psychological Methods, 24(5), 637–657. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000210
43.
VanderWeeleT. J. (2017a). On the promotion of human flourishing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(31), 8148–8156. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1702996114
44.
VanderWeeleT. J. (2017b). Religion and health: A synthesis. In BalboniM. J.PeteetJ. R. (Eds.), Spirituality and religion within the culture of medicine: From evidence to practice (Vol. 419, pp. 357–401). Oxford University Press.
45.
VanderWeeleT. J. (2017c). Religious communities and human flourishing. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(5), 476–481. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417721526
46.
WesterhofG. J.KeyesC. L. M. (2010). Mental illness and mental health: The two continua model across the lifespan. Journal of Adult Development, 17(2), 110–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-009-9082-y
47.
YadenD. B.Batz-BarbarichC. L.NgV.VaziriH.GladstoneJ. N.PawelskiJ. O.TayL. (2022). A meta-analysis of religion/spirituality and life satisfaction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 23(8), 4147–4163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-022-00558-7
48.
ZhangQ.WangL. (2014). Aggregating and testing intra-individual correlations: Methods and comparisons. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 49(2), 130–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2013.870877
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
