Proenvironmental Behavior Increases Subjective Well-Being: Evidence From an Experience-Sampling Study and a Randomized Experiment

Abstract

Two preregistered studies investigated whether engaging in proenvironmental behavior increases a person’s well-being. A 10-day experience-sampling study (7,161 observations from 181 adults in 14 countries, primarily the United States) revealed positive within-person and between-person associations, and a randomized controlled experiment (N = 545 U.S. undergraduates) found that incorporating proenvironmental behavior into individuals’ daily activities increased their experiences of happiness and meaning in life. Indeed, the effect was comparable to incorporating activities selected specifically to elicit such positive states, though these results may be affected by demand characteristics. The studies also offered some tentative preliminary evidence about why such an effect might emerge. There was some support for the hypothesis that proenvironmental behavior affects well-being by creating a “warm glow.” But overall the findings align more closely with the hypothesis that proenvironmental behavior helps to satisfy individuals’ basic psychological needs.

Keywords

environmental values happiness meaning in life self-determination theory sustainability

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aristotle. (2000). Nicomachean ethics ( Irwin

Trans.). Hackett Publishing Company.

Atkin

(2019, June 3). You will have to make sacrifices to save the planet. The New Republic. https://newrepublic.com/article/154036/will-make-sacrifices-save-planet

Bilandzic

Kalch

Soentgen

(2017). Effects of goal framing and emotions on perceived threat and willingness to sacrifice for climate change. Science Communication, 39(4), 466–491. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547017718553

Binder

Blankenberg

A.-K.

(2017). Green lifestyles and subjective well-being: More about self-image than actual behavior? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 137, 304–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2017.03.009

Bissing-Olson

M. J.

Iyer

Fielding

K. S.

Zacher

(2013). Relationships between daily affect and pro-environmental behavior at work: The moderating role of pro-environmental attitude. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(2), 156–175. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1788

Boer

Fischer

(2013). How and when do personal values guide our attitudes and sociality? Explaining cross-cultural variability in attitude-value linkages. Psychological Bulletin, 139(5), 1113–1147. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031347

Bullock

J. G.

Green

D. P.

(2021). The failings of conventional mediation analysis and a design-based alternative. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459211047227

Confucius. (2007). Analects ( B.

Watson

, Trans.). Columbia University Press.

Curran

P. J.

Bauer

D. J.

(2011). The disaggregation of within-person and between-person effects in longitudinal models of change. Annual Review of Psychology, 62(1), 583–619. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100356

10.

De Groot

J. I. M.

Steg

. (2008). Value orientations to explain beliefs related to environmental significant behavior: How to measure egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric value orientations. Environment and Behavior, 40(3), 330–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916506297831

11.

Diener

Wirtz

Tov

Kim-Prieto

Choi

Oishi

Biswas-Diener

(2010). New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97(2), 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9493-y

12.

Doell

K. C.

Conte

Brosch

(2021). Interindividual differences in environmentally relevant positive trait affect impacts sustainable behavior in everyday life. Scientific Reports, 11(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99438-y

13.

Frankl

V. E.

(1966). Self-transcendence as a human phenomenon. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 6(2), 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/002216786600600201

14.

Gollwitzer

P. M.

Sheeran

(2006). Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta-analysis of effects and processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 69–119.

15.

Grimm

(2010). Social desirability bias. In Sheth

J. N.

Malhotra

N. K.

(Eds.), Wiley international encyclopedia of marketing (Vol. 2, pp. 258–259). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444316568.wiem02057

16.

Hektner

J. M.

Schmidt

J. A.

Csikszentmihalyi

(2007). Experience sampling method: Measuring the quality of everyday life. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984201

17.

Hornsey

M. J.

Harris

E. A.

Bain

P. G.

Fielding

K. S.

(2016). Meta-analyses of the determinants and outcomes of belief in climate change. Nature Climate Change, 6(6), 622–626. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2943

18.

Huang

Yang

(2022). Self-transcendence or self-enhancement: People’s perceptions of meaning and happiness in relation to the self. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 152(2), 590–610. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001297

19.

Hui

B. P. H.

J. C. K.

Berzaghi

Cunningham-Amos

L. A.

Kogan

(2020). Rewards of kindness? A meta-analysis of the link between prosociality and well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 146(12), 1084–1116. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000298

20.

Kaiser

F. G.

Byrka

(2011). Environmentalism as a trait: Gauging people’s prosocial personality in terms of environmental engagement. International Journal of Psychology, 46(1), 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2010.516830

21.

Kasser

(2009). Psychological need satisfaction, personal well-being, and ecological sustainability. Ecopsychology, 1(4), 175–180. https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2009.0025

22.

Milloy

(2009). Green hell: How environmentalists plan to control your life and what you can do to stop them. Simon & Schuster.

23.

Nisa

Bélanger

(2019, December 23). Can you change for climate change? Scientific American. https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/can-you-change-for-climate-change/

24.

Prinzing

M. M.

De Freitas

Fredrickson

B. L.

(2022). The ordinary concept of a meaningful life: The role of subjective and objective factors in attributions of meaning. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 17(5), 639–654. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2021.1897866

25.

Reynolds

W. M.

(1982). Development of reliable and valid short forms of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38(1), 119–125. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4679(198201)38:1<119::AID-JCLP2270380118>3.0.CO;2-I

26.

Ryan

R. M.

Deci

E. L.

(2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.

27.

Schwartz

S. H.

(2009). Draft users manual: Proper use of the Schwarz Value Survey. Centre for Cross Cultural Comparisons.

28.

Schwartz

S. H.

Cieciuch

Vecchione

Davidov

Fischer

Beierlein

Ramos

Verkasalo

Lönnqvist

J.-E.

Demirutku

Dirilen-Gumus

Konty

(2012). Refining the theory of basic individual values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(4), 663–688. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029393

29.

Stone

A. A.

Bachrach

C. A.

Jobe

J. B.

Kurtzman

H. S.

Cain

V. S.

(1999). The science of self-report: Implications for research and practice. Psychology Press.

30.

Thaller

Fleiß

Brudermann

(2020). No glory without sacrifice—Drivers of climate (in)action in the general population. Environmental Science & Policy, 114, 7–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.07.014

31.

Underwood

Zahran

(2015). The carbon implications of declining household scale economies. Ecological Economics, 116, 182–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.04.028

32.

van der Linden

. (2018). Warm glow is associated with low- but not high-cost sustainable behaviour. Nature Sustainability, 1(1), 28–30. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-017-0001-0

33.

Venhoeven

L. A.

Bolderdijk

J. W.

Steg

(2016). Why acting environmentally-friendly feels good: Exploring the role of self-image. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 1846. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01846

34.

Vesely

Klöckner

C. A.

(2020). Social desirability in environmental psychology research: Three meta-analyses. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(1395). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01395

35.

Walsch

(2013, October 21). Study shows that human beings are too selfish to fix climate change. Time. https://science.time.com/2013/10/21/why-we-dont-care-about-saving-our-grandchildren-from-climate-change/

36.

Welsch

Kühling

(2010). Pro-environmental behavior and rational consumer choice: Evidence from surveys of life satisfaction. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31, 405–420.

37.

Wilkie

(2019, February 12). Donald Trump attacks Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s Green New Deal at a campaign rally in a preview of things to come for the 2020 election. CNBC. https://www.cnbc.com/2019/02/12/trump-targets-alexandria-ocasio-cortez-green-new-deal-in-campaign-speech.html

38.

Wong

P. T.

(1998). Implicit theories of meaningful life and the development of the personal meaning profile. In Wong

P. T.

Fry

P. S.

(Eds.), The human quest for meaning: A handbook of psychological research and clinical applications (pp. 111–140). Erlbaum.

39.

Wray-Lake

DeHaan

C. R.

Shubert

Ryan

R. M.

(2019). Examining links from civic engagement to daily well-being from a self-determination theory perspective. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 14(2), 166–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2017.1388432

40.

Zawadzki

S. J.

Steg

Bouman

(2020). Meta-analytic evidence for a robust and positive association between individuals’ pro-environmental behaviors and their subjective wellbeing. Environmental Research Letters, 15(12), Article 123007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abc4ae

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.50 MB