Understanding how initiatives to support Black-owned businesses are received, and why, has important social and economic implications. To address this, we designed three experiments to investigate the role of antiegalitarian versus egalitarian ideologies among White American adults. In Study 1 (N = 199), antiegalitarianism (vs. egalitarianism) predicted viewing initiatives supporting a Black-owned business as less fair, but only when the business was competing with other (presumably White-owned) businesses. In Study 2 (N = 801), antiegalitarianism predicted applying survival-of-the-fittest market beliefs, particularly to Black-owned businesses. Antiegalitarianism also predicted viewing initiatives supporting Black-owned businesses as less fair than initiatives that targeted other (presumably White-owned) businesses, especially for tangible (vs. symbolic) support that directly impacts the success of a business. In Study 3 (N = 590), antiegalitarianism predicted rejecting a program investing in Black-owned businesses. These insights demonstrate how antiegalitarian ideology can have the effect of maintaining race-based inequality, hindering programs designed to reduce that inequality.
AzevedoF.JostJ. T.RothmundT.SterlingJ. (2019). Neoliberal ideology and the justification of inequality in capitalist societies: Why social and economic dimensions of ideology are intertwined. Journal of Social Issues, 75(1), 49–88.
2.
BatesT. (2015). Contested terrain: The role of preferential policies in opening government and corporate procurement markets to Black-owned businesses. Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race, 12(1), 137–159.
3.
BatesT.FarhatJ.CaseyC. (2021). The economic development potential of minority-owned businesses. Economic Development Quarterly, 36(1), 43–56.
4.
BoneS. A.ChristensenG. L.WilliamsJ. D. (2014). Rejected, shackled, and alone: The impact of systemic restricted choice on minority consumers’ construction of self. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(2), 451–474.
5.
BradfordW. D. (2014). The “myth” that black entrepreneurship can reduce the gap in wealth between black and white families. Economic Development Quarterly, 28(3), 254–269.
6.
BrownN. D.Jacoby-SenghorD. S. (2022). Majority members misperceive even “win-win” diversity policies as unbeneficial to them. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 122(6), 1075–1097.
7.
BrownN. D.Jacoby-SenghorD. S.RaymundoI. (2022). If you rise, I fall: Equality is prevented by the misperception that it harms advantaged groups. Science Advances, 8(18), Article eabm2385. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abm2385
ChatterjiA. K.ChayK. Y.FairlieR. W. (2014). The impact of city contracting set-asides on Black self-employment and employment. Journal of Labor Economics, 32(3), 507–561.
10.
CrockettD. (2021). Racial oppression and racial projects in consumer markets: A racial formation theory approach. Journal of Consumer Research, 49(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucab050
11.
DavisJ. F. (2017). Selling whiteness? A critical review of the literature on marketing and racism. Journal of Marketing Management, 34, 134–177.
DoleacJ. L.SteinL. C. (2013). The visible hand: Race and online market outcomes. The Economic Journal, 123(572), F469–F492.
14.
DuckittJ. (2001). A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 41–113.
15.
DuckittJ. (2006). Differential effects of right wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation on outgroup attitudes and their mediation by threat from and competitiveness to outgroups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(5), 684–696.
16.
EdelmanB.LucaM.SvirskyD. (2017). Racial discrimination in the sharing economy: Evidence from a field experiment. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 9(2), 1–22.
17.
EssesV. M.JacksonL. M.ArmstrongT. L. (1998). Intergroup competition and attitudes toward immigrants and immigration: An instrumental model of group conflict. Journal of Social Issues, 54(4), 699–724.
18.
FairlieR.RobbA.RobinsonD. T. (2021). Black and white: Access to capital among minority-owned start-ups. Management Science, 68(4), 2377–2400.
HatemiP. K.MedlandS. E.KlemmensenR.OskarssonS.LittvayL.DawesC. T.. . . MartinN. G. (2014). Genetic influences on political ideologies: Twin analyses of 19 measures of political ideologies from five democracies and genome-wide findings from three populations. Behavior Genetics, 44, 282–294.
22.
HayesA. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Publications.
23.
HoA. K.SidaniusJ.KteilyN.Sheehy-SkeffingtonJ.PrattoF.HenkelK. E.. . . StewartA. L. (2015). The nature of social dominance orientation: Theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO7 scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(6), 1003–1028.
JohnsonG. D.ThomasK. D.HarrisonA. K.GrierS. A. (Eds.). (2019). Race in the marketplace: Crossing critical boundaries. Springer.
26.
JostJ. T.GlaserJ.KruglanskiA. W.SullowayF. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 339–375.
27.
KteilyN. S.Sheehy-SkeffingtonJ.HoA. K. (2017). Hierarchy in the eye of the beholder: (Anti-) egalitarianism shapes perceived levels of social inequality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(1), 136.
28.
KteilyN. S.SidaniusJ.LevinS. (2011). Social dominance orientation: Cause or ‘mere effect’? Evidence for SDO as a causal predictor of prejudice and discrimination against ethnic and racial outgroups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(1), 208–214.
29.
LitmanL.RobinsonJ.AbberbockT. (2017). TurkPrime.com: A versatile crowdsourcing data acquisition platform for the behavioral sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 49(2), 433–442.
30.
LucasB. J.KteilyN. S. (2018). (Anti-)egalitarianism differentially predicts empathy for members of advantaged versus disadvantaged groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114(5), 665–692.
MesserC.ShriverT.AdamsA. (2018). The destruction of Black Wall Street: Tulsa’s 1921 riot and the eradication of accumulated wealth. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 77(3–4), 789–819.
33.
MontoyaA. K. (2019). Moderation analysis in two-instance repeated measures designs: Probing methods and multiple moderator models. Behavior Research Methods, 51(1), 61–82.
34.
NkomoS. M. (1992). The emperor has no clothes: Rewriting “race in organizations.” The Academy of Management Review, 17(3), 487–513. https://doi.org/10.2307/258720
35.
NopperT. K. (2011). Minority, Black and non-Black people of color: ‘New’ color-blind racism and the US Small Business Administration’s approach to minority business lending in the post-civil rights era. Critical Sociology, 37(5), 651–671. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920510380068
36.
OgboluM. N.SinghR. P. (2019). Studying consumer ethnocentrism as a factor for depressed rates of Black entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Diversity, 19(5). https://doi.org/10.33423/jbd.v19i5.2647
PooleS.GrierS.ThomasK.SobandeF.EkpoA.TrujilloT.AddingtonL.Weekes-LaidlowM.HendersonG. R. (2021). Operationalizing critical race theory in the marketplace. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 40(2), 126–142.
40.
PrattoF.SidaniusJ.StallworthL. M.MalleB. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763.
41.
RothsteinR. (2017). The color of law. Liveright.
42.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (1999). Social dominance: An inter-group theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge University Press.
43.
SmithD.JamesC.GriffithsM. (2021). Co-brand partnerships making space for the next black girl: Backlash in social justice branding. Psychology & Marketing, 38(12), 2314–2326.
44.
SpillerS. A.FitzsimonsG. J.LynchJ. G.Jr.McClellandG. H. (2013). Spotlights, floodlights, and the magic number zero: Simple effects tests in moderated regression. Journal of Marketing Research, 50(2), 277–288.
45.
StephanW. G.StephanC. W. (2000). An integrated threat theory of prejudice. In OskampS. (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 23–46). Erlbaum.
YounkinP.KuppuswamyV. (2019). Discounted: The effect of founder race on the price of new products. Journal of Business Venturing, 34(2), 389–412.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
