Four preregistered experiments (N = 4,307) explored whether anti-Christian bias claims can discreetly signal White allyship among Christian American adults. In Experiments 1 and 2, reading about anti-Christian bias led White, but not Black, Christians to perceive more anti-White bias. Experiments 3 and 4 demonstrate the connection between Christian and White can be leveraged by politicians in the form of a racial dog whistle. In Experiment 3, White Christians perceived a politician concerned about anti-Christian bias as caring more about anti-White bias and more willing to fight for White people (relative to a control). This politician was also perceived as less offensive than a politician concerned about anti-White bias. In Experiment 4, Black Christians perceived a politician concerned about anti-Christian bias as less offensive than one concerned about anti-White bias yet still unlikely to fight for Black people. Results suggest “anti-Christian bias” can provide a relatively palatable way to signal allegiance to White people.
Al-KireR.PasekM.TsangJ.-A.LemanJ.RowattW. (2022). Protecting America’s borders: Christian nationalism, threat, and attitudes toward immigrants in the United States. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 25(2), 354–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220978291
2.
ApfelbaumE. P.NortonM. I.SommersS. R. (2012). Racial color blindness: Emergence, practice, and implications. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(3), 205–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411434980
3.
BhatP.KlenO. (2020). Covert hate speech: White nationalists and dog whistle communication on Twitter. In BouvierG.RosenbaumJ. E. (Eds.), Twitter, the public sphere, and the chaos of online deliberation (pp. 151–172). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41421-4_7
4.
BlodornA.O’BrienL. T. (2013). Evaluations of White American versus Black American discrimination claimants’ political views and prejudicial attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(2), 211–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.11.004
5.
ButlerA. (2021). White evangelical racism: The politics of morality in America. University of North Carolina Press.
6.
ButzD. A.CarvalhoJ. D. (2015). Examining the psychological separation of church and state: The American—Christian effect. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 7(2), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037706
7.
ChandlerJ.RosenzweigC.MossA. J.RobinsonJ.LitmanL. (2019). Online panels in social science research: Expanding sampling methods beyond Mechanical Turk. Behavior Research Methods, 51(5), 2022–2038.
8.
CraigM. A.RuckerJ. M.RichesonJ. A. (2018). Racial and political dynamics of an approaching “majority-minority” United States. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 677(1), 204–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716218766269
9.
DanboldF.OnyeadorI. N.UnzuetaM. M. (2022). Dominant groups support digressive victimhood claims to counter accusations of discrimination. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 98, Article 104233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104233
10.
DavisJ. T.PerryS. L. (2021). White Christian nationalism and relative political tolerance for racists. Social Problems, 68(3), 513–534. https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spaa002
Haney-LópezI. (2014). Dog whistle politics: How coded racial appeals have reinvented racism and wrecked the middle class. Oxford University Press.
16.
JonesR. P. (2016). The end of White Christian America. Simon & Schuster.
17.
KaiserC. R.MillerC. T. (2001). Stop complaining! The social costs of making attributions to discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(2), 254–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201272010
18.
MendelbergT. (2001). The race card: Campaign strategy, implicit messages, and the norm of equality. Princeton University Press.
MontgomeryJ. M.NyhanB.TorresM. (2018). How conditioning on posttreatment variables can ruin your experiment and what to do about it. American Journal of Political Science, 62(3), 760–775. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12357
21.
NtetaT. M.LisiR.TarsiM. R. (2016). Rendering the implicit explicit: Political advertisements, partisan cues, race, and white public opinion in the 2012 presidential election. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 4(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2015.1050407
PerryS. L. (2023). Mating call, dog whistle, trigger: Asymmetric alignments, race, and the use of reactionary religious rhetoric in American politics. Sociological Theory, 41(1), 56–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/073527512311536
RenyT. T.ValenzuelaA. A.CollingwoodL. (2020). “No, you’re playing the race card”: Testing the effects of anti-Black, anti-Latino, and anti-immigrant appeals in the post-Obama era. Political Psychology, 41(2), 283–302. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12614
29.
ScarboroughW. J.SinR.RismanB. (2019). Attitudes and the stalled gender revolution: Egalitarianism, traditionalism, and ambivalence from 1977 through 2016. Gender & Society, 33(2), 173–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/08912432188096
30.
SherkatD. E. (2017). Intersecting identities and support for same-sex marriage in the United States. Social Currents, 4(4), 380–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329496516663221
ValentinoN. A.HutchingsV. L.WhiteI. K. (2002). Cues that matter: How political ads prime racial attitudes during campaigns. American Political Science Review, 96(1), 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055402004240
WettsR.WillerR. (2019). Who is called by the dog whistle? Experimental evidence that racial resentment and political ideology condition responses to racially encoded messages. Socius, 5, 2378023119866268. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023119866268
37.
WhiteI. K. (2007). When race matters and when it doesn’t: Racial group differences in response to racial cues. American Political Science Review, 101(2), 339–354. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055407070177
38.
WhiteheadA. L.ScheitleC. P. (2018). We the (Christian) people: Christianity and American identity from 1996 to 2014. Social Currents, 5(2), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329496517725333
39.
WilkinsC. L.KaiserC. R. (2014). Racial progress as threat to the status hierarchy: Implications for perceptions of anti-White bias. Psychological Science, 25(2), 439–446. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613508412
40.
WilkinsC. L.WellmanJ. D.KaiserC. R. (2013). Status legitimizing beliefs predict positivity toward Whites who claim anti-White bias. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(6), 1114–1119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.05.017
41.
WilkinsC. L.WellmanJ. D.ToosiN. R.MillerC. A.LisnekJ. A.MartinL. A. (2022). Is LGBT progress seen as an attack on Christians? Examining Christian/sexual orientation zero-sum beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 122(1), 73–101. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000363
42.
ZouL. X.CheryanS. (2017). Two axes of subordination: A new model of racial position. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(5), 696–717. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000080
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
