Transparency Is Now the Default at Psychological Science

Alter G. Gonzalez R. (2018). Responsible practices for data sharing. American Psychologist, 73(2), 146–156. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000258

Bakker M. Veldkamp C. L. S. Assen M. A. L. M. van Crompvoets E. A. V. Ong H. H. Nosek B. A. Soderberg C. K. Mellor D. Wicherts J. M. (2020). Ensuring the quality and specificity of preregistrations. PLOS Biology, 18(12), Article e3000937. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000937

Bauer P. J. (2020). Expanding the reach of Psychological Science. Psychological Science, 31(1), 3–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619898664

Bauer P. J. (2021). Why it is important to know how the sausage is made: Benefits, risks, and responsibilities of using third-party data. Psychological Science, 32(6), 861–862. https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976211021594

Bauer P. J. (2022). Psychological Science stepping up a level. Psychological Science, 33(2), 179–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976221078527

Bauer P. J. (2023). Attention to authenticity: An essential analogue to focus on rigor and replicability. Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/095679762312208

Borghi J. A. Van Gulick A. E. (2021). Data management and sharing: Practices and perceptions of psychology researchers. PLOS ONE, 16(5), Article e0252047. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252047

Claesen A. Gomes S. Tuerlinckx F. Vanpaemel W. (2021). Comparing dream to reality: An assessment of adherence of the first generation of preregistered studies. Royal Society Open Science, 8(10), 211037. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.211037

Crüwell S. Apthorp D. Baker B. J. Colling L. Elson M. Geiger S. J. Lobentanzer S. Monéger J. Patterson A. Schwarzkopf D. S. Zaneva M. Brown N. J. L. (2023). What’s in a badge? A computational reproducibility investigation of the open data badge policy in one issue of Psychological Science. Psychological Science, 34(4), 512–522. https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976221140828

Eich E. (2014). Business not as usual. Psychological Science, 25(1), 3–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613512465

Fidler F. Thomason N. Cumming G. Finch S. Leeman J. (2004). Editors can lead researchers to confidence intervals, but can’t make them think: Statistical reform lessons from medicine. Psychological Science, 15(2), 119–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.01502008.x

Hardwicke T. E. Bohn M. MacDonald K. Hembacher E. Nuijten M. B. Peloquin B. N. deMayo B. E. Long B. Yoon E. J. Frank M. C. (2021). Analytic reproducibility in articles receiving open data badges at the journal Psychological Science: An observational study. Royal Society Open Science, 8(1), 201494. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201494

Hardwicke T. E. Mathur M. B. MacDonald K. Nilsonne G. Banks G. C. Kidwell M. C. Hofelich Mohr A. Clayton E. Yoon E. J. Henry Tessler M. Lenne R. L. Altman S. Long B. Frank M. C. (2018). Data availability, reusability, and analytic reproducibility: Evaluating the impact of a mandatory open data policy at the journal Cognition. Royal Society Open Science, 5(8), 180448. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.180448

Hardwicke T. E. Wagenmakers E.-J. (2023). Reducing bias, increasing transparency and calibrating confidence with preregistration. Nature Human Behaviour, 7(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01497-2

Homewood C. (2023). Investigating issues with reproducibility in journal articles published in Psychological Science [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/6d5nq

Kidwell M. C. Lazarević L. B. Baranski E. Hardwicke T. E. Piechowski S. Falkenberg L.-S. Kennett C. Slowik A. Sonnleitner C. Hess-Holden C. Errington T. M. Fiedler S. Nosek B. A. (2016). Badges to acknowledge open practices: A simple, low-cost, effective method for increasing transparency. PLOS Biology, 14(5), Article e1002456. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456

Lindsay D. S. (2017). Sharing data and materials in Psychological Science. Psychological Science, 28(6), 699–702. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617704015

Lindsay D. S. (2019). Swan song editorial. Psychological Science, 30(12), 1669–1673. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619893653

Meyer M. N. (2018). Practical tips for ethical data sharing. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(1), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917747656

Nosek B. A. Beck E. D. Campbell L. Flake J. K. Hardwicke T. E. Mellor D. T. van ’t Veer A. E. Vazire S. (2019). Preregistration is hard, and worthwhile. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(10), 815–818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.07.009

TARG Meta-Research Group. (2022). Discrepancy review: A feasibility study of a novel peer review intervention to reduce undisclosed discrepancies between registrations and publications. Royal Society Open Science, 9, 20142. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.220142

Thibault R. T. Pennington C. R. Munafò M. R. (2023). Reflections on preregistration: Core criteria, badges, complementary workflows. Journal of Trial and Error. https://doi.org/10.36850/mr6

Towse J. N. Ellis D. A. Towse A. S. (2020). Opening Pandora’s box: Peeking inside psychology’s data sharing practices, and seven recommendations for change. Behavior Research Methods, 53, 1455–1468. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-020-01486-1

van den Akker O. R. van Assen M. A. L. M. Enting M. de Jonge M. Ong H. H. Rüffer F. Schoenmakers M. Stoevenbelt A. H. Wicherts J. M. Bakker M . (2023). Selective hypothesis reporting in psychology: Comparing preregistrations and corresponding publications. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 6(3), 25152459231187988. https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459231187988

Vazire S. (2019). Do we want to be credible or incredible? APS Observer, 33. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/do-we-want-to-be-credible-or-incredible

Vazire S. (2023). The next chapter for Psychological Science. Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976231221558

Vilhuber L. (2020). Reproducibility and replicability in economics. Harvard Data Science Review, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.4f6b9e67

Willroth E. C. Atherton O. E. (2023). Best laid plans: A guide to reporting preregistration deviations [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/dwx69