The Next Chapter for Psychological Science

Aly M. Colunga E. Crockett M. J. Goldrick M. Gomez P. Kung F. Y. McKee P. C. Pérez M. Stilwell S. M. Diekman A. B. (2023). Changing the culture of peer review for a more inclusive and equitable psychological science. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 152(12), 3546–3565. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001461

Bauer P. J. (2020a). A call for greater sensitivity in the wake of a publication controversy. Psychological Science, 31(7), 767–769. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620941482

Bauer P. J. (2020b). Expanding the reach of Psychological Science. Psychological Science, 31(1), 3–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619898664

Bauer P. J. (2021). Why it is important to know how the sausage is made: Benefits, risks, and responsibilities of using third-party data. Psychological Science, 32(6), 861–862. https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976211021594

Bauer P. J. (2022). Psychological science stepping up a level. Psychological Science, 33(2), 179–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976221078527

Bauer P. J. (2023). Responding to the Association for Psychological Science Strategic Plan, 2022–2027. Psychological Science, 34(1), 3–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976221133816

Corneille O. Havemann J. Henderson E. L. IJzerman H. Hussey I. Orban de Xivry J. J. Lotter L. D. (2023). Beware “persuasive communication devices” when writing and reading scientific articles. eLife, 12, Article e88654.

Eich E. (2014). Business not as usual. Psychological Science, 25(1), 3–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613512465

Hardwicke T. E. Vazire S. (2023). Transparency is now the default at Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976231221573

Hoekstra R. Vazire S. (2021). Aspiring to greater intellectual humility in science. Nature Human Behaviour, 5, 1602–1607. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01203-8

Lewis N. A. Jr. Wai J. (2021). Communicating what we know and what isn’t so: Science communication in psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(6), 1242–1254.

Lindsay D. S. (2015). Replication in Psychological Science. Psychological Science, 26(12), 1827–1832. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615616374

Lindsay D. S. (2017). Sharing data and materials in Psychological Science. Psychological Science, 28(6), 699–702. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617704015

Lindsay D. S. (2019). Swan song editorial. Psychological Science, 30(12), 1669–1673. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619893653

Longino H. E. (1990). Science as social knowledge: Values and objectivity in scientific inquiry. Princeton University Press.

Roberts S. O. Bareket-Shavit C. Dollins F. A. Goldie P. D. Mortenson E. (2020). Racial inequality in psychological research: Trends of the past and recommendations for the future. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(6), 1295–1309. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620927709

Srivastava S. (2012). A Pottery Barn rule for scientific journals. The Hardest Science. https://thehardestscience.com/2012/09/27/a-pottery-barn-rule-for-scientific-journals/#:~:text=Proposed%3A%20Once%20a%20journal%20has,is%20not%20dependent%20on%20outcome

Tiokhin L. Panchanathan K. Smaldino P. E. Lakens D. (2023). Shifting the level of selection in science. Perspectives on Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916231182568

Vazire S. (2019). Do we want to be credible or incredible? APS Observer, 33. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/do-we-want-to-be-credible-or-incredible

Vazire S. Schiavone S. R. Bottesini J. G. (2022). Credibility beyond replicability: Improving the four validities in psychological science. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 31(2), 162–168.