Much of human learning happens through interaction with other people, but little is known about how this process is reflected in the brains of students and teachers. Here, we concurrently recorded electroencephalography (EEG) data from nine groups, each of which contained four students and a teacher. All participants were young adults from the northeast United States. Alpha-band (8–12 Hz) brain-to-brain synchrony between students predicted both immediate and delayed posttest performance. Further, brain-to-brain synchrony was higher in specific lecture segments associated with questions that students answered correctly. Brain-to-brain synchrony between students and teachers predicted learning outcomes at an approximately 300-ms lag in the students’ brain activity relative to the teacher’s brain activity, which is consistent with the time course of spoken-language comprehension. These findings provide key new evidence for the importance of collecting brain data simultaneously from groups of learners in ecologically valid settings.
BabikerA.FayeI.MumtazW.MalikA. S.SatoH. (2019). EEG in classroom: EMD features to detect situational interest of students during learning. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 78(12), 16261–16281.
2.
BabiloniF.AstolfiL. (2014). Social neuroscience and hyperscanning techniques: Past, present and future. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 44, 76–93.
3.
BalconiM.PezardL.NandrinoJ. L.VanutelliM. E. (2017). Two is better than one: The effects of strategic cooperation on intra-and inter-brain connectivity by fNIRS. PLOS ONE, 12(11), Article e0187652. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187652
4.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall.
5.
BevilacquaD.DavidescoI.WanL.ChalonerK.RowlandJ.DingM.PoeppelD.DikkerS. (2019). Brain-to-brain synchrony and learning outcomes vary by student-teacher dynamics: Evidence from a real-world classroom electroencephalography study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 31(3), 401–411. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01274
6.
BoudewynM. A.CarterC. S. (2018). I must have missed that: Alpha-band oscillations track attention to spoken language. Neuropsychologia, 117, 148–155.
7.
BurgessA. P. (2013). On the interpretation of synchronization in EEG hyperscanning studies: A cautionary note. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, Article 881. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00881
8.
ClarkeA. R.BarryR. J.DupuyF. E.McCarthyR.SelikowitzM.HeavenP. C. (2011). Childhood EEG as a predictor of adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Clinical Neurophysiology, 122(1), 73–80.
9.
CohenS. S.MadsenJ.TouchanG.RoblesD.LimaS. F. A.HeninS.ParraL. C. (2018). Neural engagement with online educational videos predicts learning performance for individual students. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 155, 60–64.
10.
CohenS. S.ParraL. C. (2016). Memorable audiovisual narratives synchronize sensory and supramodal neural responses. eNeuro, 3(6). https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0203-16.2016
11.
DelormeA.MakeigS. (2004). EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134(1), 9–21.
12.
DikkerS.HaegensS.BevilacquaD.DavidescoI.WanL.KaggenL.McClintockJ.ChalonerK.DingM.WestT.PoeppelD. (2020). Morning brain: Real-world neural evidence that high school class times matter. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 15(11), 1193–1202.
13.
DikkerS.SilbertL. J.HassonU.ZevinJ. D. (2014). On the same wavelength: Predictable language enhances speaker–listener brain-to-brain synchrony in posterior superior temporal gyrus. The Journal of Neuroscience, 34(18), 6267–6272.
14.
DikkerS.WanL.DavidescoI.KaggenL.OostrikM.McClintockJ.RowlandJ.MichalareasG.Van BavelJ. J.DingM.PoeppelD. (2017). Brain-to-brain synchrony tracks real-world dynamic group interactions in the classroom. Current Biology, 27(9), 1375–1380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.04.002
15.
DumasG.NadelJ.SoussignanR.MartinerieJ.GarneroL. (2010). Inter-brain synchronization during social interaction. PLOS ONE, 5(8), Article e12166. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012166
16.
ForrinN. D.HuynhA. C.SmithA. C.CyrE. N.McLeanD. B.Siklos-WhillansJ.RiskoE. F.SmilekD.MacLeodC. M. (2021). Attention spreads between students in a learning environment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 27(2), 276–291.
17.
GwilliamsL. (2020). How the brain composes morphemes into meaning. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 375(1791), Article 20190311. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0311
18.
HaegensS.HändelB. F.JensenO. (2011). Top-down controlled alpha band activity in somatosensory areas determines behavioral performance in a discrimination task. The Journal of Neuroscience, 31(14), Article 5197. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5199-10.2011
19.
HaegensS.NácherV.LunaR.RomoR.JensenO. (2011). α-oscillations in the monkey sensorimotor network influence discrimination performance by rhythmical inhibition of neuronal spiking. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 108(48), 19377–19382.
20.
HamiltonA. F. (2021). Hyperscanning: Beyond the hype. Neuron, 109(3), 404–407.
21.
HamreB. K.PiantaR. C. (2006). Student-teacher relationships. In BearG. G.MinkeK. M. (Eds.), Children’s needs III: Development, prevention, and intervention (pp. 59–71). National Association of School Psychologists.
22.
HariR.HenrikssonL.MalinenS.ParkkonenL. (2015). Centrality of social interaction in human brain function. Neuron, 88(1), 181–193.
23.
HassonU.FurmanO.ClarkD.DudaiY.DavachiL. (2008). Enhanced intersubject correlations during movie viewing correlate with successful episodic encoding. Neuron, 57(3), 452–462.
24.
HassonU.GhazanfarA.GalantucciB.GarrodS.KeysersC. (2012). Brain-to-brain coupling: A mechanism for creating and sharing a social world. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(2), 114–121.
25.
JammalamadakaS. R.SenGuptaA. (2001). Topics in circular statistics. World Scientific.
26.
JensenO.MazaheriA. (2010). Shaping functional architecture by oscillatory alpha activity: Gating by inhibition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4, Article 186. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2010.00186
27.
JungT.-P.HumphriesC.LeeT.-W.MakeigS.McKeownM. J.IraguiV.SejnowskiT. J. (1997). Extended ICA removes artifacts from electroencephalographic recordings. In JordanM. I.KearnsM. J.SollaS. A. (Eds.), NIPS’97: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (pp. 894–900). MIT Press.
28.
KlimeschW.SausengP.HanslmayrS. (2007). EEG alpha oscillations: The inhibition–timing hypothesis. Brain Research Reviews, 53(1), 63–88.
29.
KoL.-W.KomarovO.HairstonW. D.JungT.-P.LinC.-T. (2017). Sustained attention in real classroom settings: An EEG study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11, Article 388. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00388
LiuJ.ZhangR.GengB.ZhangT.YuanD.OtaniS.LiX. (2019). Interplay between prior knowledge and communication mode on teaching effectiveness: Interpersonal neural synchronization as a neural marker. NeuroImage, 193, 93–102.
32.
LiuY.PiazzaE. A.SimonyE.ShewokisP. A.OnaralB.HassonU.AyazH. (2017). Measuring speaker–listener neural coupling with functional near infrared spectroscopy. Scientific Reports, 7, Article 43293. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep43293
33.
MartinF.SunT.TurkM.RitzhauptA. D. (2021). A meta-analysis on the effects of synchronous online learning on cognitive and affective educational outcomes. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 22(3), 205–242.
34.
MeeuwissenE. B.TakashimaA.FernándezG.JensenO. (2011). Increase in posterior alpha activity during rehearsal predicts successful long-term memory formation of word sequences. Human Brain Mapping, 32(12), 2045–2053.
35.
MeshulamM.HasenfratzL.HillmanH.LiuY.-F.NguyenM.NormanK. A.HassonU. (2021). Neural alignment predicts learning outcomes in students taking an introduction to computer science course. Nature Communications, 12(1), Article 1922. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22202-3
36.
OostenveldR.FriesP.MarisE.SchoffelenJ.-M. (2011). FieldTrip: Open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2011, Article 156869. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/156869
PanY.DikkerS.GoldsteinP.ZhuY.YangC.HuY. (2020). Instructor-learner brain coupling discriminates between instructional approaches and predicts learning. NeuroImage, 211, Article 116657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116657
39.
PanY.NovembreG.OlssonA. (2022). The interpersonal neuroscience of social learning. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 17(3), 680–695. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916211008429
40.
PérezA.DumasG.KaradagM.DuñabeitiaJ. A. (2019). Differential brain-to-brain entrainment while speaking and listening in native and foreign languages. Cortex, 111, 303–315.
41.
PetersonA. T.BeymerP. N.PutnamR. T. (2018). Synchronous and asynchronous discussions: Effects on cooperation, belonging, and affect. Online Learning, 22(4), 7–25.
PoulsenA. T.KamronnS.DmochowskiJ.ParraL. C.HansenL. K. (2017). EEG in the classroom: Synchronised neural recordings during video presentation. Scientific Reports, 7, Article 43916. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep43916
44.
RedcayE.SchilbachL. (2019). Using second-person neuroscience to elucidate the mechanisms of social interaction. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 20(8), 495–505.
45.
RifkinJ. L.NunnC. L.GaramszegiL. Z. (2012). Do animals living in larger groups experience greater parasitism? A meta-analysis. The American Naturalist, 180(1), 70–82.
46.
SchilbachL.TimmermansB.ReddyV.CostallA.BenteG.SchlichtT.VogeleyK. (2013). Toward a second-person neuroscience 1. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(4), 393–414.
47.
Shamay-TsooryS. G.SaportaN.Marton-AlperI. Z.GvirtsH. Z. (2019). Herding brains: A core neural mechanism for social alignment. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(3), 174–186.
48.
ShteynbergG. (2015). Shared attention. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(5), 579–590.
49.
ShultzS.DunbarR. I. (2007). The evolution of the social brain: Anthropoid primates contrast with other vertebrates. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 274(1624), 2429–2436.
50.
StephensG. J.SilbertL. J.HassonU. (2010). Speaker–listener neural coupling underlies successful communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 107(32), Article 14425. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1008662107
51.
TomaselloM. (1995). Joint attention as social cognition. In MooreC.DunhamP. J. (Eds.), Joint attention: Its origins and role in development (pp. 103–130). Routledge.
52.
VygotskyL. S. (1986). Thought and language (Rev. ed; KozulinA., Ed. and Trans.). MIT Press. (Original work published 1934)
53.
WassS. V.NoreikaV.GeorgievaS.ClacksonK.BrightmanL.NutbrownR.CovarrubiasL. S.LeongV. (2018). Parental neural responsivity to infants’ visual attention: How mature brains influence immature brains during social interaction. PLOS Biology, 16(12), Article e2006328. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2006328
54.
ZhengL.ChenC.LiuW.LongY.ZhaoH.BaiX.ZhangZ.HanZ.LiuLGuoT.ChenB.DingG.LuC. (2018). Enhancement of teaching outcome through neural prediction of the students’ knowledge state. Human Brain Mapping, 39(7), 3046–3057.
55.
ZhouX.PanY.ZhangR.BeiL.LiX. (2021). Mortality threat mitigates interpersonal competition: An EEG-based hyperscanning study. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 16(6), 621–631.
56.
ZhuY.LeongV.HouY.ZhangD.PanY.HuY. (2021). Instructor–learner neural synchronization during elaborated feedback predicts learning transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(6), 1427–1441.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
