American Psychological Association Committee on International Relations in Psychology. (2015). Going international: A practical guide for psychologists. Book 2: Engaging in international collaborative research. Office of International Affairs. https://www.apa.org/international/resources/publications/research.pdf
3.
ArnettJ. J. (2008). The neglected 95%: Why American psychology needs to become less American. American Psychologist, 63(7), 602–614. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.63.7.602
CheekN. N. (2017). Scholarly merit in a global context: The nation gap in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6), 1133–1137. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617708233
RadM. S.MartinganoA. J.GingesJ. (2018). Toward a psychology of Homo sapiens: Making psychological science more representative of the human population. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 115(45), 11401–11405. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1721165115
12.
SimonsD. J.ShodaY.LindsayD. S. (2017). Constraints on generality (COG): A proposed addition to all empirical papers. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6), 1123–1128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617708630
ZárateM. A.HallG. N.PlautV. C. (2017). Researchers of color, fame, and impact. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6), 1176–1178. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617710511