Peer relationships and social belonging are particularly important during adolescence. Using a willingness-to-work paradigm to quantify incentive motivation, we examined whether evaluative information holds unique value for adolescents. Participants (N = 102; 12–23 years old) rated peers, predicted how peers rated them, and exerted physical effort to view each peer’s rating. We measured grip force, speed, and opt-out behavior to examine the motivational value of peer feedback, relative to money in a control condition, and to assess how peer desirability and participants’ expectations modulated motivated effort across age. Overall, when compared with adolescents, adults were relatively less motivated for feedback than money. Whereas adults exerted less force and speed for feedback when expecting rejection, adolescents exerted greater force and speed when expecting to be more strongly liked or disliked. These findings suggest that the transition into adulthood is accompanied by a self-protective focus, whereas adolescents are motivated to consume highly informative feedback, even if negative.
AlloyL. B.AbramsonL. Y. (1979). Judgment of contingency in depressed and nondepressed students: Sadder but wiser?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108(4), 441–485. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.108.4.441
2.
AltikulaçS.BosM. G. N.FoulkesL.CroneE. A.van HoornJ. (2019). Age and gender effects in sensitivity to social rewards in adolescents and young adults. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 13, Article 171. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00171
BaumeisterR. F.LearyM. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
5.
BeauregardK. S.DunningD. (1998). Turning up the contrast: Self-enhancement motives prompt egocentric contrast effects in social judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(3), 606–621. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.606
6.
BosD. J.BarnesE. D.SilverB. M.AjodanE. L.Clark-WhitneyE.ScultM. A.PowerJ. D.JonesR. M. (2021). An effort-based social feedback paradigm reveals aversion to popularity in socially anxious participants and increased motivation in adolescents. PLOS ONE, 16(4), Article e0249326. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249326
7.
BrownB. B. (1990). Peer groups and peer cultures. In FeldmanS. S.ElliottG. R. (Eds.), At the threshold: The developing adolescent (pp. 171–196). Harvard University Press.
8.
CairnsR. B.LeungM.-C.BuchananL.CairnsB. D. (1995). Friendships and social networks in childhood and adolescence: Fluidity, reliability, and interrelations. Child Development, 66(5), 1330–1345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1995.tb00938.x
9.
CroneE. A.DahlR. E. (2012). Understanding adolescence as a period of social–affective engagement and goal flexibility. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 13(9), 636–650. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3313
10.
DaveyC. G.AllenN. B.HarrisonB. J.DwyerD. B.YücelM. (2010). Being liked activates primary reward and midline self-related brain regions. Human Brain Mapping, 31(4), 660–668. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20895
11.
DeanerR. O.KheraA. V.PlattM. L. (2005). Monkeys pay per view: Adaptive valuation of social images by rhesus macaques. Current Biology, 15(6), 543–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2005.01.044
12.
EthridgeP.KujawaA.DirksM. A.ArferK. B.KesselE. M.KleinD. N.WeinbergA. (2017). Neural responses to social and monetary reward in early adolescence and emerging adulthood. Psychophysiology, 54(12), 1786–1799. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12957
13.
FoulkesL.BlakemoreS.-J. (2016). Is there heightened sensitivity to social reward in adolescence?Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 40, 81–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2016.06.016
14.
GuyerA. E.ChoateV. R.PineD. S.NelsonE. E. (2012). Neural circuitry underlying affective response to peer feedback in adolescence. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7(1), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsr043
15.
HarterS. (1988). Self-perception profile for adolescents. University of Denver.
16.
HaydenB. Y.ParikhP. C.DeanerR. O.PlattM. L. (2007). Economic principles motivating social attention in humans. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 274(1619), 1751–1756. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2007.0368
17.
HepperE. G.HartC. M.GreggA. P.SedikidesC. (2011). Motivated expectations of positive feedback in social interactions. The Journal of Social Psychology, 151(4), 455–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2010.503722
18.
HughesB. L.BeerJ. S. (2012). Protecting the self: The effect of social-evaluative threat on neural representations of self. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(4), 613–622. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00343
JonesR. M.SomervilleL. H.LiJ.RuberryE. J.LibbyV.GloverG.VossH. U.BallonD. J.CaseyB. J. (2011). Behavioral and neural properties of social reinforcement learning. Journal of Neuroscience, 31(37), 13039–13045. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2972-11.2011
21.
KoolW.McGuireJ. T.RosenZ. B.BotvinickM. M. (2010). Decision making and the avoidance of cognitive demand. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139(4), 665–682. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020198
22.
KurniawanI. T.SeymourB.TalmiD.YoshidaW.ChaterN.DolanR. J. (2010). Choosing to make an effort: The role of striatum in signaling physical effort of a chosen action. Journal of Neurophysiology, 104(1), 313–321. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00027.2010
23.
LaFontanaK. M.CillessenA. H. N. (2010). Developmental changes in the priority of perceived status in childhood and adolescence. Social Development, 19(1), 130–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00522.x
24.
LarsonR. (2001). How U.S. children and adolescents spend time: What it does (and doesn’t) tell us about their development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10(5), 160–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00139
25.
LearyM. R.BaumeisterR. F. (2000). The nature and function of self-esteem: Sociometer theory. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 32, pp. 1–62). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(00)80003-9
26.
MorelliS. A.LeongY. C.CarlsonR. W.KullarM.ZakiJ. (2018). Neural detection of socially valued community members. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 115(32), 8149–8154. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1712811115
27.
NeemannJ.HarterS. (1986). Manual for the self-perception profile for college students. University of Denver.
28.
NivY.DawN. D.JoelD.DayanP. (2007). Tonic dopamine: Opportunity costs and the control of response vigor. Psychopharmacology, 191(3), 507–520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-006-0502-4
29.
PessiglioneM.SchmidtL.DraganskiB.KalischR.LauH.DolanR. J.FrithC. D. (2007). How the brain translates money into force: A neuroimaging study of subliminal motivation. Science, 316(5826), 904–906. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1140459
30.
PfeiferJ. H.MastenC. L.BorofskyL. A.DaprettoM.FuligniA. J.LiebermanM. D. (2009). Neural correlates of direct and reflected self-appraisals in adolescents and adults: When social perspective-taking informs self-perception. Child Development, 80(4), 1016–1038. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01314.x
31.
PoulinF.ChanA. (2010). Friendship stability and change in childhood and adolescence. Developmental Review, 30(3), 257–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2009.01.001
32.
PowersK. E.SomervilleL. H.KelleyW. M.HeathertonT. F. (2013). Rejection sensitivity polarizes striatal–medial prefrontal activity when anticipating social feedback. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(11), 1887–1895. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00446
33.
PrinsteinM. J.AikinsJ. W. (2004). Cognitive moderators of the longitudinal association between peer rejection and adolescent depressive symptoms. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 32(2), 147–158. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JACP.0000019767.55592.63
34.
R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 3.5.2) [Computer software]. https://www.R-project.org/
35.
RijJ.van WielingM.BaayenR. H.Rijn vanH. (2020). itsadug: Interpreting time series and autocorrelated data using GAMMs (Version 2.4) [Computer software]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=itsadug
36.
RodmanA. M.PowersK. E.InselC.KastmanE. K.KabotyanskiK. E.StarkA. M.WorthingtonS.SomervilleL. H. (2021). How adolescents and adults translate motivational value to action: Age-related shifts in strategic physical effort exertion for monetary rewards. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 150(1), 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000769
37.
RodmanA. M.PowersK. E.SomervilleL. H. (2017). Development of self-protective biases in response to social evaluative feedback. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 114(50), 13158–13163. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1712398114
38.
SalamoneJ. D.CorreaM.FarrarA.MingoteS. M. (2007). Effort-related functions of nucleus accumbens dopamine and associated forebrain circuits. Psychopharmacology, 191(3), 461–482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-006-0668-9
39.
SchmidtL.LebretonM.Cléry-MelinM.-L.DaunizeauJ.PessiglioneM. (2012). Neural mechanisms underlying motivation of mental versus physical effort. PLOS Biology, 10(2), Article e1001266. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001266
40.
SebastianC.BurnettS.BlakemoreS.-J. (2008). Development of the self-concept during adolescence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(11), 441–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.07.008
41.
SebastianC.VidingE.WilliamsK. D.BlakemoreS.-J. (2010). Social brain development and the affective consequences of ostracism in adolescence. Brain and Cognition, 72(1), 134–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2009.06.008
42.
SilkJ. S.StroudL. R.SiegleG. J.DahlR. E.LeeK. H.NelsonE. E. (2012). Peer acceptance and rejection through the eyes of youth: Pupillary, eyetracking and ecological data from the chatroom interact task. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7(1), 93–105. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsr044
43.
SomervilleL. H. (2013). The teenage brain: Sensitivity to social evaluation. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(2), 121–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413476512
44.
SomervilleL. H.HeathertonT. F.KelleyW. M. (2006). Anterior cingulate cortex responds differentially to expectancy violation and social rejection. Nature Neuroscience, 9(8), 1007–1008. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1728
45.
SomervilleL. H.JonesR. M.RuberryE. J.DykeJ. P.GloverG.CaseyB. J. (2013). The medial prefrontal cortex and the emergence of self-conscious emotion in adolescence. Psychological Science, 24(8), 1554–1562. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613475633
46.
SpreckelmeyerK. N.KrachS.KohlsG.RademacherL.IrmakA.KonradK.KircherT.GründerG. (2009). Anticipation of monetary and social reward differently activates mesolimbic brain structures in men and women. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 4(2), 158–165. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsn051
47.
TamirD. I.HughesB. L. (2018). Social rewards: From basic social building blocks to complex social behavior. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(6), 700–717. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691618776263
WangD.LiuT.ShiJ. (2020). Neural dynamic responses of monetary and social reward processes in adolescents. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 14, Article 141. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00141
50.
WangD.MaY. (2020). Oxytocin facilitates valence-dependent valuation of social evaluation of the self. Communications Biology, 3, Article 433. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-020-01168-w
51.
WillG.-J.RutledgeR. B.MoutoussisM.DolanR. J. (2017). Neural and computational processes underlying dynamic changes in self-esteem. Elife, 6, Article e28098. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.28098
52.
WoodS. N. (2003). Thin plate regression splines. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 65(1), 95–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9868.00374
53.
WoodS. N. (2017). Generalized additive models: An introduction with R (2nd ed.). CRC Press.
54.
WoodS. N. (2019). Package “mgcv”: Mixed GAM computation vehicle with automatic smoothness estimation (Version 1.8-31) [Computer software]. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/mgcv/
55.
YoonL.SomervilleL. H.KimH. (2018). Development of MPFC function mediates shifts in self-protective behavior provoked by social feedback. Nature Communications, 9(1), Article 3086. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05553-2
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
