Physical Effort Exertion for Peer Feedback Reveals Evolving Social Motivations From Adolescence to Young Adulthood

Abstract

Peer relationships and social belonging are particularly important during adolescence. Using a willingness-to-work paradigm to quantify incentive motivation, we examined whether evaluative information holds unique value for adolescents. Participants (N = 102; 12–23 years old) rated peers, predicted how peers rated them, and exerted physical effort to view each peer’s rating. We measured grip force, speed, and opt-out behavior to examine the motivational value of peer feedback, relative to money in a control condition, and to assess how peer desirability and participants’ expectations modulated motivated effort across age. Overall, when compared with adolescents, adults were relatively less motivated for feedback than money. Whereas adults exerted less force and speed for feedback when expecting rejection, adolescents exerted greater force and speed when expecting to be more strongly liked or disliked. These findings suggest that the transition into adulthood is accompanied by a self-protective focus, whereas adolescents are motivated to consume highly informative feedback, even if negative.

Keywords

adolescent peer feedback social motivation effort open data open materials

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alloy

L. B.

Abramson

L. Y.

(1979). Judgment of contingency in depressed and nondepressed students: Sadder but wiser? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108(4), 441–485. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.108.4.441

Altikulaç

Bos

M. G. N.

Foulkes

Crone

E. A.

van Hoorn

(2019). Age and gender effects in sensitivity to social rewards in adolescents and young adults. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 13, Article 171. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00171

Arnett

J. J.

(1999). Adolescent storm and stress, reconsidered. American Psychologist, 54(5), 317–326. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.54.5.317

Baumeister

R. F.

Leary

M. R.

(1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497

Beauregard

K. S.

Dunning

(1998). Turning up the contrast: Self-enhancement motives prompt egocentric contrast effects in social judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(3), 606–621. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.606

Bos

D. J.

Barnes

E. D.

Silver

B. M.

Ajodan

E. L.

Clark-Whitney

Scult

M. A.

Power

J. D.

Jones

R. M.

(2021). An effort-based social feedback paradigm reveals aversion to popularity in socially anxious participants and increased motivation in adolescents. PLOS ONE, 16(4), Article e0249326. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249326

Brown

B. B.

(1990). Peer groups and peer cultures. In Feldman

S. S.

Elliott

G. R.

(Eds.), At the threshold: The developing adolescent (pp. 171–196). Harvard University Press.

Cairns

R. B.

Leung

M.-C.

Buchanan

Cairns

B. D.

(1995). Friendships and social networks in childhood and adolescence: Fluidity, reliability, and interrelations. Child Development, 66(5), 1330–1345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1995.tb00938.x

Crone

E. A.

Dahl

R. E.

(2012). Understanding adolescence as a period of social–affective engagement and goal flexibility. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 13(9), 636–650. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3313

10.

Davey

C. G.

Allen

N. B.

Harrison

B. J.

Dwyer

D. B.

Yücel

(2010). Being liked activates primary reward and midline self-related brain regions. Human Brain Mapping, 31(4), 660–668. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20895

11.

Deaner

R. O.

Khera

A. V.

Platt

M. L.

(2005). Monkeys pay per view: Adaptive valuation of social images by rhesus macaques. Current Biology, 15(6), 543–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2005.01.044

12.

Ethridge

Kujawa

Dirks

M. A.

Arfer

K. B.

Kessel

E. M.

Klein

D. N.

Weinberg

(2017). Neural responses to social and monetary reward in early adolescence and emerging adulthood. Psychophysiology, 54(12), 1786–1799. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12957

13.

Foulkes

Blakemore

S.-J.

(2016). Is there heightened sensitivity to social reward in adolescence? Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 40, 81–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2016.06.016

14.

Guyer

A. E.

Choate

V. R.

Pine

D. S.

Nelson

E. E.

(2012). Neural circuitry underlying affective response to peer feedback in adolescence. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7(1), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsr043

15.

Harter

(1988). Self-perception profile for adolescents. University of Denver.

16.

Hayden

B. Y.

Parikh

P. C.

Deaner

R. O.

Platt

M. L.

(2007). Economic principles motivating social attention in humans. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 274(1619), 1751–1756. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2007.0368

17.

Hepper

E. G.

Hart

C. M.

Gregg

A. P.

Sedikides

(2011). Motivated expectations of positive feedback in social interactions. The Journal of Social Psychology, 151(4), 455–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2010.503722

18.

Hughes

B. L.

Beer

J. S.

(2012). Protecting the self: The effect of social-evaluative threat on neural representations of self. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(4), 613–622. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00343

19.

Izuma

Saito

D. N.

Sadato

(2008). Processing of social and monetary rewards in the human striatum. Neuron, 58(2), 284–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2008.03.020

20.

Jones

R. M.

Somerville

L. H.

Ruberry

E. J.

Libby

Glover

Voss

H. U.

Ballon

D. J.

Casey

B. J.

(2011). Behavioral and neural properties of social reinforcement learning. Journal of Neuroscience, 31(37), 13039–13045. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2972-11.2011

21.

Kool

McGuire

J. T.

Rosen

Z. B.

Botvinick

M. M.

(2010). Decision making and the avoidance of cognitive demand. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139(4), 665–682. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020198

22.

Kurniawan

I. T.

Seymour

Talmi

Yoshida

Chater

Dolan

R. J.

(2010). Choosing to make an effort: The role of striatum in signaling physical effort of a chosen action. Journal of Neurophysiology, 104(1), 313–321. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00027.2010

23.

LaFontana

K. M.

Cillessen

A. H. N.

(2010). Developmental changes in the priority of perceived status in childhood and adolescence. Social Development, 19(1), 130–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00522.x

24.

Larson

(2001). How U.S. children and adolescents spend time: What it does (and doesn’t) tell us about their development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10(5), 160–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00139

25.

Leary

M. R.

Baumeister

R. F.

(2000). The nature and function of self-esteem: Sociometer theory. In Zanna

M. P.

(Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 32, pp. 1–62). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(00)80003-9

26.

Morelli

S. A.

Leong

Y. C.

Carlson

R. W.

Kullar

Zaki

(2018). Neural detection of socially valued community members. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 115(32), 8149–8154. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1712811115

27.

Neemann

Harter

(1986). Manual for the self-perception profile for college students. University of Denver.

28.

Niv

Daw

N. D.

Joel

Dayan

(2007). Tonic dopamine: Opportunity costs and the control of response vigor. Psychopharmacology, 191(3), 507–520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-006-0502-4

29.

Pessiglione

Schmidt

Draganski

Kalisch

Lau

Dolan

R. J.

Frith

C. D.

(2007). How the brain translates money into force: A neuroimaging study of subliminal motivation. Science, 316(5826), 904–906. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1140459

30.

Pfeifer

J. H.

Masten

C. L.

Borofsky

L. A.

Dapretto

Fuligni

A. J.

Lieberman

M. D.

(2009). Neural correlates of direct and reflected self-appraisals in adolescents and adults: When social perspective-taking informs self-perception. Child Development, 80(4), 1016–1038. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01314.x

31.

Poulin

Chan

(2010). Friendship stability and change in childhood and adolescence. Developmental Review, 30(3), 257–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2009.01.001

32.

Powers

K. E.

Somerville

L. H.

Kelley

W. M.

Heatherton

T. F.

(2013). Rejection sensitivity polarizes striatal–medial prefrontal activity when anticipating social feedback. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(11), 1887–1895. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00446

33.

Prinstein

M. J.

Aikins

J. W.

(2004). Cognitive moderators of the longitudinal association between peer rejection and adolescent depressive symptoms. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 32(2), 147–158. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JACP.0000019767.55592.63

34.

R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 3.5.2) [Computer software]. https://www.R-project.org/

35.

Rij

van Wieling

Baayen

R. H.

Rijn van

(2020). itsadug: Interpreting time series and autocorrelated data using GAMMs (Version 2.4) [Computer software]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=itsadug

36.

Rodman

A. M.

Powers

K. E.

Insel

Kastman

E. K.

Kabotyanski

K. E.

Stark

A. M.

Worthington

Somerville

L. H.

(2021). How adolescents and adults translate motivational value to action: Age-related shifts in strategic physical effort exertion for monetary rewards. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 150(1), 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000769

37.

Rodman

A. M.

Powers

K. E.

Somerville

L. H.

(2017). Development of self-protective biases in response to social evaluative feedback. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 114(50), 13158–13163. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1712398114

38.

Salamone

J. D.

Correa

Farrar

Mingote

S. M.

(2007). Effort-related functions of nucleus accumbens dopamine and associated forebrain circuits. Psychopharmacology, 191(3), 461–482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-006-0668-9

39.

Schmidt

Lebreton

Cléry-Melin

M.-L.

Daunizeau

Pessiglione

(2012). Neural mechanisms underlying motivation of mental versus physical effort. PLOS Biology, 10(2), Article e1001266. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001266

40.

Sebastian

Burnett

Blakemore

S.-J.

(2008). Development of the self-concept during adolescence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(11), 441–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.07.008

41.

Sebastian

Viding

Williams

K. D.

Blakemore

S.-J.

(2010). Social brain development and the affective consequences of ostracism in adolescence. Brain and Cognition, 72(1), 134–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2009.06.008

42.

Silk

J. S.

Stroud

L. R.

Siegle

G. J.

Dahl

R. E.

Lee

K. H.

Nelson

E. E.

(2012). Peer acceptance and rejection through the eyes of youth: Pupillary, eyetracking and ecological data from the chatroom interact task. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7(1), 93–105. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsr044

43.

Somerville

L. H.

(2013). The teenage brain: Sensitivity to social evaluation. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(2), 121–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413476512

44.

Somerville

L. H.

Heatherton

T. F.

Kelley

W. M.

(2006). Anterior cingulate cortex responds differentially to expectancy violation and social rejection. Nature Neuroscience, 9(8), 1007–1008. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1728

45.

Somerville

L. H.

Jones

R. M.

Ruberry

E. J.

Dyke

J. P.

Glover

Casey

B. J.

(2013). The medial prefrontal cortex and the emergence of self-conscious emotion in adolescence. Psychological Science, 24(8), 1554–1562. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613475633

46.

Spreckelmeyer

K. N.

Krach

Kohls

Rademacher

Irmak

Konrad

Kircher

Gründer

(2009). Anticipation of monetary and social reward differently activates mesolimbic brain structures in men and women. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 4(2), 158–165. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsn051

47.

Tamir

D. I.

Hughes

B. L.

(2018). Social rewards: From basic social building blocks to complex social behavior. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(6), 700–717. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691618776263

48.

Wang

Liu

Shi

(2017). Development of monetary and social reward processes. Scientific Reports, 7(1), Article 11128. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-11558-6

49.

Wang

Liu

Shi

(2020). Neural dynamic responses of monetary and social reward processes in adolescents. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 14, Article 141. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00141

50.

Wang

(2020). Oxytocin facilitates valence-dependent valuation of social evaluation of the self. Communications Biology, 3, Article 433. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-020-01168-w

51.

Will

G.-J.

Rutledge

R. B.

Moutoussis

Dolan

R. J.

(2017). Neural and computational processes underlying dynamic changes in self-esteem. Elife, 6, Article e28098. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.28098

52.

Wood

S. N.

(2003). Thin plate regression splines. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 65(1), 95–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9868.00374

53.

Wood

S. N.

(2017). Generalized additive models: An introduction with R (2nd ed.). CRC Press.

54.

Wood

S. N.

(2019). Package “mgcv”: Mixed GAM computation vehicle with automatic smoothness estimation (Version 1.8-31) [Computer software]. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/mgcv/

55.

Yoon

Somerville

L. H.

Kim

(2018). Development of MPFC function mediates shifts in self-protective behavior provoked by social feedback. Nature Communications, 9(1), Article 3086. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05553-2

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

2.86 MB