From an early age, children are willing to pay a personal cost to punish others for violations that do not affect them directly. Various motivations underlie such “costly punishment”: People may punish to enforce cooperative norms (amplifying punishment of in-groups) or to express anger at perpetrators (amplifying punishment of out-groups). Thus, group-related values and attitudes (e.g., how much one values fairness or feels out-group hostility) likely shape the development of group-related punishment. The present experiments (N = 269, ages 3−8 from across the United States) tested whether children’s punishment varies according to their parents’ political ideology—a possible proxy for the value systems transmitted to children intergenerationally. As hypothesized, parents’ self-reported political ideology predicted variation in the punishment behavior of their children. Specifically, parental conservatism was associated with children’s punishment of out-group members, and parental liberalism was associated with children’s punishment of in-group members. These findings demonstrate how differences in group-related ideologies shape punishment across generations.
AckermanJ. M.ShapiroJ. R.NeubergS. L.KenrickD. T.BeckerD. V.GriskeviciusV.ManerJ. K.SchallerM. (2006). They all look the same to me (unless they’re angry): From out-group homogeneity to out-group heterogeneity. Psychological Science, 17(10), 836–840. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01790.x
2.
AlfordJ. R.FunkC. L.HibbingJ. R. (2005). Are political orientations genetically transmitted?American Political Science Review, 99(2), 153–167.
3.
BatesD.MächlerM.BolkerB.WalkerS. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1). https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
4.
BerndsenM.GauselN. (2015). When majority members exclude ethnic minorities: The impact of shame on the desire to object to immoral acts. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(6), 728–741.
5.
BernhardH.FehrE.FischbacherU. (2006). Group affiliation and altruistic norm enforcement. American Economic Review, 96(2), 217–221.
6.
BlakeP. R.McAuliffeK.WarnekenF. (2014). The developmental origins of fairness: The knowledge-behavior gap. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(11), 559–561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.08.003
7.
BoydR.GintisH.BowlesS.RichersonP. J. (2003). The evolution of altruistic punishment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 100, 3531–3535.
8.
BrandtM. J.CrawfordJ. T. (2016). Answering unresolved questions about the relationship between cognitive ability and prejudice. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(8), 884–892. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616660592
9.
CardenS. W.HoltzmanN. S.StrubeM. J. (2017). CAHOST: An Excel workbook for facilitating the Johnson-Neyman technique for two-way interactions in multiple regression. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 1293. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01293
10.
CarlsmithK. M.DarleyJ. M.RobinsonP. H. (2002). Why do we punish? Deterrence and just deserts as motives for punishment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(2), 284–299.
11.
Cavalli-SforzaL. L.FeldmanM. W.ChenK. H.DornbuschS. M. (1982). Theory and observation in cultural transmission. Science, 218(4567), 19–27.
12.
ChatmanC. M.HippelW. (2001). Attributional mediation of in-group bias. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 267–272.
13.
ChettyR.FriedmanJ. N.HendrenN.JonesM. R.PorterS. R. (2018). The opportunity atlas: Mapping the childhood roots of social mobility (No. w25147). National Bureau of Economic Research.
14.
ConfinoD.Schori-EyalN.GurT.Falomir-PichastorJ. M. (2022). Retribution versus rehabilitation as motives for support of offender’s punishment: The moderating role of mindsets about malleability. Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/23743603.2022.2026215
15.
CowellJ. M.DecetyJ. (2015). Precursors to morality in development as a complex interplay between neural, socioenvironmental, and behavioral facets. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 112(41), 12657–12662. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1508832112
16.
De ZavalaA. G.CislakA.WesolowskaE. (2010). Political conservatism, need for cognitive closure, and intergroup hostility. Political Psychology, 31(4), 521–541.
17.
DeltonA. W.KrasnowM. M. (2017). The psychology of deterrence explains why group membership matters for third-party punishment. Evolution and Human Behavior, 38(6), 734–743.
18.
DunhamY.BaronA. S.CareyS. (2011). Consequences of “minimal” group affiliations in children. Child Development, 82(3), 793–811.
19.
DunleaJ. P.HeiphetzL. (2021). Children’s and adults’ views of punishment as a path to redemption. Child Development, 92(4), e398–e415.
FeldmanS.StennerK. (1997). Perceived threat and authoritarianism. Political Psychology, 18, 741–770.
22.
GelmanS. A.TaylorM. G.NguyenS. P. (2004). Mother-child conversations about gender: Understanding the acquisition of essentialist beliefs. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 69(1), 1–14.
23.
GerberM. M.JacksonJ. (2013). Retribution as revenge and retribution as just deserts. Social Justice Research, 26(1), 61–80.
24.
GrahamJ.HaidtJ.NosekB. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 1029–1046.
25.
HenrichJ.McElreathR.BarrA.EnsmingerJ.BarrettC.BolyanatzA.ZikerJ. (2006). Costly punishment across human societies. Science, 312(5781), 1767–1770.
26.
HirshJ. B.DeYoungC. G.XuX.PetersonJ. B. (2010). Compassionate liberals and polite conservatives: Associations of agreeableness with political ideology and moral values. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(5), 655–664. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210366854
27.
HussakL. J.CimpianA. (2018). Investigating the origins of political views: Biases in explanation predict conservative attitudes in children and adults. Developmental Science, 21(3), Article e12567. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12567
28.
JohnsonP. O.FayL. C. (1950). The Johnson-Neyman technique, its theory and application. Psychometrika, 15(4), 349–367.
29.
JordanJ. J.McAuliffeK.WarnekenF. (2014). Development of in-group favoritism in children’s third-party punishment of selfishness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 111(35), 12710–12715.
30.
JostJ. T.BanajiM. R.NosekB. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25(6), 881–919. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00402.x
31.
JostJ. T.GlaserJ.KruglanskiA. W.SullowayF. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 339–375. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339
32.
JostJ. T.NamH. H.AmodioD. M.Van BavelJ. J. (2014). Political neuroscience: The beginning of a beautiful friendship. Political Psychology, 35(Suppl 1), 3–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12162
33.
KimM.DecetyJ.WuL.BaekS.SankeyD. (2021). Neural computations in children’s third-party interventions are modulated by their parents’ moral values. NPJ Science of Learning, 6(1), Article 38. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-021-00116-5
34.
KingA.MarunaS. (2009). Is a conservative just a liberal who has been mugged? Exploring the origins of punitive views. Punishment & Society, 11(2), 147–169.
35.
LeshinR. A.LeslieS. J.RhodesM. (2021). Does it matter how we speak about social kinds? A large, pre-registered, online experimental study of how language shapes the development of essentialist beliefs. Child Development, 92(4), 531–547.
36.
LingemanJ.FreemanC.AdolphK. E. (2014). Datavyu (Version 1.2.2) [Computer software]. https://datavyu.org/
37.
MarshallJ.YudkinD. A.CrockettM. J. (2020). Children punish third parties to satisfy both consequentialist and retributive motives. Nature Human Behavior, 5, 361–368.
38.
MathewS.BoydR. (2011). Punishment sustains large-scale cooperation in prestate warfare. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(28), 11375–11380.
39.
McAuliffeK.BlakeP. R.WarnekenF. (2014). Children reject inequity out of spite. Biology Letters, 10(12), Article 20140743. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2014.0743
40.
McAuliffeK.DunhamY. (2017). Fairness overrides group bias in children’s second-party punishment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146(4), 485–494. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000244
41.
McAuliffeK.DunhamY. (2021). Children favor punishment over restoration. Developmental Science, 24(5), Article e13093. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.13093
42.
MeeusenC.BoonenJ. (2022). Facilitators of intergenerational similarity in social and political attitudes: The role of discussion, sophistication, attitudinal homogeneity, and gender. Acta Politica, 57, 277–297. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-020-00186-0
43.
MischA.PaulusM.DunhamY. (2021). Anticipation of future cooperation eliminates minimal ingroup bias in children and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 150(10), 2036–2056. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000899
44.
PiffP. K.MartinezA. G.KeltnerD. (2012). Me against we: In-group transgression, collective shame, and in-group-directed hostility. Cognition & Emotion, 26(4), 634–649.
45.
R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 4.0) [Computer software]. http://www.R-project.org
46.
Reifen TagarM.FedericoC.LyonsK.LudekeS.KoenigM. (2014). Heralding the authoritarian? Orientation toward authority in early childhood. Psychological Science, 25(4), 883–892.
47.
RhodesM.ChalikL. (2013). Social categories as markers of intrinsic interpersonal obligations. Psychological Science, 24(6), 999–1006. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612466267
48.
RhodesM.GelmanS. A. (2009). A developmental examination of the conceptual structure of animal, artifact, and human social categories across two cultural contexts. Cognitive Psychology, 59, 294–274.
49.
RhodesM.RizzoM.Foster-HansonE.MotyK.LeshinR.WangM. M.BenitezJ.OcampoJ. D. (2020). Advancing developmental science via unmoderated remote research with children. Journal of Cognition and Development, 21(4), 477–493.
50.
RicoG.JenningsM. K. (2016). The formation of left-right identification: Pathways and correlates of parental influence. Political Psychology, 37, 237–252.
51.
RobinsonC. C.MandlecoB.OlsenS. F.HartC. H. (1995). Authoritative, authoritarian, and permissive parenting practices: Development of a new measure. Psychological Reports, 77(3), 819–830. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1995.77.3.819
52.
RokeachM. (1973). The nature of human values. Free Press.
53.
SchmidtM. F.RakoczyH.TomaselloM. (2012). Young children enforce social norms selectively depending on the violator’s group affiliation. Cognition, 124(3), 325–333.
54.
SegallG.BirnbaumD.DeebI.DiesendruckG. (2015). The intergenerational transmission of ethnic essentialism: How parents talk counts the most. Developmental Science, 18(4), 543–555. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12235
55.
ShinadaM.YamagishiT.OhmuraY. (2004). False friends are worse than bitter enemies: “Altruistic” punishment of in-group members. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25(6), 379–393.
56.
TajfelH. (1970). Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Scientific American, 223(5), 96–103.
57.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In AustinW. G.WorchelS. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–37). Brooks/Cole.
58.
VaishA.MissanaM.TomaselloM. (2011). Three-year-old children intervene in third-party moral transgressions. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 29(1), 124–130.
59.
YamagishiT.KiyonariT. (2000). The group as the container of generalized reciprocity. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(2), 116–132.
60.
YudkinD. A.BavelJ. V.RhodesM. (2020). Young children police group members at personal cost. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 149(1), 182–191. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000613
61.
YudkinD. A.RothmundT.TwardawskiM.ThallaN.Van BavelJ. (2016). Reflexive intergroup bias in third-party punishment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145, 1448–1459.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
