New technology invariably provokes concerns over potential societal impacts. Even as risks often fail to materialize, the fear continues. The current research explored the psychological underpinnings of this pattern. Across four studies (N = 2,454 adults recruited via Amazon Mechanical Turk), we found evidence for the role of status quo thinking in evaluating technology. In Study 1, we experimentally manipulated the reported age of unfamiliar technology and found that people evaluate it more favorably when it is described as originating before (vs. after) their birth. In Studies 2 through 4, participants’ age at the time of invention strongly predicts attitudes toward a wide range of real-world technologies. Finally, we found that individual differences in status-quo-based decision-making moderated evaluations of technology. These studies provide insight into how people respond to the rapidly changing technological landscape.
BatesD.MächlerM.BolkerB.WalkerS. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1). https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
2.
boydd. (2014). It’s complicated: The social lives of networked teens. Yale University Press.
3.
BuhrmesterM. D.TalaifarS.GoslingS. D. (2018). An evaluation of Amazon’s Mechanical Turk, its rapid rise, and its effective use. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13, 149–154.
4.
CarrN. (2020). The shallows: What the Internet is doing to our brains. W. W. Norton.
5.
CecuttiL.ChemeroA.LeeS. W. (2021). Technology may change cognition without necessarily harming it. Nature Human Behaviour, 5(8), 973–975.
6.
ChmielewskiM.KuckerS. C. (2020). An MTurk crisis? Shifts in data quality and the impact on study results. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(4), 464–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619875149
7.
EidelmanS.CrandallC. S. (2012). Bias in favor of the status quo. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6(3), 270–281.
8.
EidelmanS.CrandallC. S.PattershallJ. (2009). The existence bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(5), 765–775.
9.
EidelmanS.PattershallJ.CrandallC. S. (2010). Longer is better. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(6), 993–998.
FrancioliS. P.NorthM. S. (2021). Youngism: The content, causes, and consequences of prejudices toward younger adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 150(12), 2591–2612. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001064
12.
HolbrookM. B.SchindlerR. M. (1989). Some exploratory findings on the development of musical tastes. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(1), 119–124.
13.
HussakL. J.CimpianA. (2015). An early-emerging explanatory heuristic promotes support for the status quo. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(5), 739–752.
14.
IyengarS. S.WellsR. E.SchwartzB. (2006). Doing better but feeling worse: Looking for the “best” job undermines satisfaction. Psychological Science, 17(2), 143–150.
15.
JohnsonE. J.GoldsteinD. (2003). Do defaults save lives?Science, 302, 1338–1339.
16.
JostJ. T. (2020). A theory of system justification. Harvard University Press.
17.
JostJ. T.GlaserJ.KruglanskiA. W.SullowayF. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 339–375.
18.
KayA. C.GaucherD.PeachJ. M.LaurinK.FriesenJ.ZannaM. P.SpencerS. J. (2009). Inequality, discrimination, and the power of the status quo: Direct evidence for a motivation to see the way things are as the way they should be. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(3), 421–434.
LakensD.EtzA. J. (2017). Too true to be bad: When sets of studies with significant and nonsignificant findings are probably true. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(8), 875–881.
21.
LiangY.LeeS. A. (2017). Fear of autonomous robots and artificial intelligence: Evidence from national representative data with probability sampling. International Journal of Social Robotics, 9(3), 379–384.
22.
LitmanL.RobinsonJ.AbberbockT. (2017). TurkPrime.com: A versatile crowdsourcing data acquisition platform for the behavioral sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 49, 433–442.
23.
MadrianB. C.SheaD. F. (2001). The power of suggestion: Inertia in 401(k) participation and savings behavior. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(4), 1149–1187. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355301753265543
24.
OrbenA. (2020). The Sisyphean cycle of technology panics. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(5), 1143–1157.
25.
PetersonC. (2021). What is your earliest memory? It depends. Memory, 29(6), 811–822.
26.
Plato. (1972). Phaedrus (HackforthR., Trans.). Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 360 B.C.E.)
27.
ProtzkoJ.SchoolerJ. W. (2019). Kids these days: Why the youth of today seem lacking. Science Advances, 5(10), Article eaav5916.
28.
RaoR. S.ChandyR. K.PrabhuJ. C. (2008). The fruits of legitimacy: Why some new ventures gain more from innovation than others. Journal of Marketing, 72(4), 58–75.
29.
SamuelsonW.ZeckhauserR. (1988). Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1(1), 7–59.
30.
SimmonsJ. (2014, April4). MTurk vs. the lab: Either way we need big samples. Data Colada. http://datacolada.org/18
31.
SimonH. A. (1956). Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review, 63, 129–138.
32.
SuriG.SheppesG.SchwartzC.GrossJ. J. (2013). Patient inertia and the status quo bias: When an inferior option is preferred. Psychological Science, 24(9), 1763–1769.
33.
TverskyA.ShafirE. (1992). Choice under conflict: The dynamics of deferred decision. Psychological Science, 3(6), 358–361.
34.
TwengeJ. M. (2018). iGen: Why today’s super-connected kids are growing up less rebellious, more tolerant, less happy – and completely unprepared for adulthood. Atria Books.
35.
WarnerR. H.KiddooK. L. (2014). Are the latter-day saints too latter day? Perceived age of the Mormon Church and attitudes toward Mormons. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 17(1), 67–78.
36.
WartellaE.RobbM. (2008). Historical and recurring concerns about children’s use of the mass media. In CalvertS. L.WilsonB. J. (Eds.), The handbook of children, media, and development (pp. 5–26). Blackwell.
