A long-standing debate concerns whether developmental dyscalculia is characterized by core deficits in processing nonsymbolic or symbolic numerical information as well as the role of domain-general difficulties. Heterogeneity in recruitment and diagnostic criteria make it difficult to disentangle this issue. Here, we selected children (n = 58) with severely compromised mathematical skills (2 SD below average) but average domain-general skills from a large sample referred for clinical assessment of learning disabilities. From the same sample, we selected a control group of children (n = 42) matched for IQ, age, and visuospatial memory but with average mathematical skills. Children with dyscalculia showed deficits in both symbolic and nonsymbolic number sense assessed with simple computerized tasks. Performance in the digit-comparison task and the numerosity match-to-sample task reliably separated children with developmental dyscalculia from controls in cross-validated logistic regression (area under the curve = .84). These results support a number-sense-deficit theory and highlight basic numerical abilities that could be targeted for early identification of at-risk children as well as for intervention.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Association.
2.
AnobileG.ArrighiR.BurrD. C. (2019). Simultaneous and sequential subitizing are separate systems, and neither predicts math abilities. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 178, 86–103. https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.jecp.2018.09.017
3.
AshkenaziS.Rosenberg-LeeM.MetcalfeA. W.SwigartA. G.MenonV. (2013). Visuo-spatial working memory is an important source of domain-general vulnerability in the development of arithmetic cognition. Neuropsychologia, 51(11), 2305–2317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.06.031
4.
AstleD. E.Fletcher-WatsonS. (2020). Beyond the core-deficit hypothesis in developmental disorders. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29(5), 431–437. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721420925518
5.
AttoutL.MajerusS. (2015). Working memory deficits in developmental dyscalculia: The importance of serial order. Child Neuropsychology, 21(4), 432–450. https://doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2014.922170
6.
BiancardiA.NicolettiC.BachmannC. (2016). BDE 2-Batteria Discalculia Evolutiva: Test per la diagnosi dei disturbi dell’elaborazione numerica e del calcolo in età evolutiva–8-13 anni. [Developmental Dyscalculia Battery: Test for diagnosing numerical processing and calculation disorders in childhood - 8-13 y.o.]. Edizioni Centro Studi Erickson.
7.
BugdenS.AnsariD. (2016). Probing the nature of deficits in the ‘approximate number system’ in children with persistent developmental dyscalculia. Developmental Science, 19(5), 817–833. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12324
De SmedtB.NoëlM.-P.GilmoreC.AnsariD. (2013). How do symbolic and non-symbolic numerical magnitude processing skills relate to individual differences in children’s mathematical skills? A review of evidence from brain and behavior. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 2(2), 48–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2013.06.001
10.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA.-G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.
FuW.DolfiS.DecarliG.SpironelliC.ZorziM. (2022). Electrophysiological signatures of numerosity encoding in a delayed match-to-sample task. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 15, Article 750582. http://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.750582
13.
GearyD. C.HoardM. K.NugentL.Byrd-CravenJ. (2008). Development of number line representations in children with mathematical learning disability. Developmental Neuropsychology, 33(3), 277–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/87565640801982361
14.
GilmoreC.AttridgeN.ClaytonS.CraggL.JohnsonS.MarlowN.SimmsV.InglisM. (2013). Individual differences in inhibitory control, not non-verbal number acuity, correlate with mathematics achievement. PLOS ONE, 8(6), Article e67374. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067374
15.
HalberdaJ.MazzoccoM. M. M.FeigensonL. (2008). Individual differences in non-verbal number acuity correlate with maths achievement. Nature, 455(7213), 665–668. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07246
16.
KaufmannL.MazzoccoM. M.DowkerA.von AsterM.GöbelS.GrabnerR. H.HenikA.JordanN. C.Karmiloff-SmithA. D.KucianK.RubinstenO.SzücsD.ShalevR.NuerkH. C. (2013). Dyscalculia from a developmental and differential perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, Article 516. https://doi.org/10.3389%2Ffpsyg.2013.00516
17.
KorkmanM.KirkU.KempS. (2007). NEPSY-II: A developmental neuropsychological assessment. The Psychological Corporation.
LanderlK.BevanA.ButterworthB. (2004). Developmental dyscalculia and basic numerical capacities: A study of 8-9-year-old students. Cognition, 93(2), 99–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2003.11.004
20.
LanderlK.FusseneggerB.MollK.WillburgerE. (2009). Dyslexia and dyscalculia: Two learning disorders with different cognitive profiles. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103(3), 309–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2009.03.006
21.
LyonsI. M.PriceG. R.VaessenA.BlomertL.AnsariD. (2014). Numerical predictors of arithmetic success in grades 1-6. Developmental Science, 5, 714–726. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12152
22.
MammarellaI. C.ToffaliniE.CaviolaS.CollingL.SzűcsD. (2021). No evidence for a core deficit in developmental dyscalculia or mathematical learning disabilities. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 62(6), 704–714. https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fjcpp.13397
23.
MoreyR. D.RouderJ. N.JamilT. (2015). BayesFactor: Computation of Bayes factors for common designs (R package Version 0.9.12-2). https://rdrr.io/cran/BayesFactor/
24.
MorsanyiK.van BersB. M.McCormackT.McGourtyJ. (2018). The prevalence of specific learning disorder in mathematics and comorbidity with other developmental disorders in primary school-age children. British Journal of Psychology, 109, 917–940. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12322
25.
PerryC.ZorziM.ZieglerJ. C. (2019). Understanding dyslexia through personalized large-scale computational models. Psychological Science, 30(3), 386–395. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0956797618823540
26.
PetersL.AnsariD. (2019). Are specific learning disorders truly specific, and are they disorders?Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 17, Article 100115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2019.100115
PiazzaM.FacoettiA.TrussardiA. N.BertelettiI.ConteS.LucangeliD.DehaeneS.ZorziM. (2010). Developmental trajectory of number acuity reveals a severe impairment in developmental dyscalculia. Cognition, 116(1), 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.03.012
29.
RafteryA. E. (1995). Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociological Methodology, 25, 111–163. https://doi.org/10.2307%2F271063
30.
ReeveR.ReynoldsF.HumberstoneJ.ButterworthB. (2012). Stability and change in markers of core numerical competencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(4), 649–666. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027520
31.
Reigosa-CrespoV.Valdés-SosaM.ButterworthB.EstévezN.RodríguezM.SantosE.TorresP.SuárezR.LageA. (2012). Basic numerical capacities and prevalence of developmental dyscalculia: The Havana Survey. Developmental Psychology, 48(1), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025356
32.
RousselleL.NoëlM.-P. (2007). Basic numerical skills in children with mathematics learning disabilities: A comparison of symbolic vs non-symbolic number magnitude processing. Cognition, 102(3), 361–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.01.005
33.
SasanguieD.VosH. (2018). About why there is a shift from cardinal to ordinal processing in the association with arithmetic between first and second grade. Developmental Science, 21(5), Article e12653. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12653
34.
SchneiderM.BeeresK.CobanL.MerzS.SchmidtS. S.StrickerJ.De SmedtB. (2017). Associations of non-symbolic and symbolic numerical magnitude processing with mathematical competence: A meta-analysis. Developmental Science, 20, Article e12372. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12372
SellaF.SasanguieD.ReynvoetB. (2020). Judging the order of numbers relies on familiarity rather than activating the mental number line. Acta Psychologica, 204, Article 103014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103014
38.
SieglerR. S.OpferJ. E. (2003). The development of numerical estimation: Evidence for multiple representations of numerical quantity. Psychological Science, 14(3), 237–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.02438
39.
SzűcsD.DevineA.SolteszF.NobesA.GabrielF. (2013). Developmental dyscalculia is related to visuo-spatial memory and inhibition impairment. Cortex, 49(10), 2674–2688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2013.06.007
40.
VanbinstK.GhesquièreP.SmedtB. D. (2012). Numerical magnitude representations and individual differences in children’s arithmetic strategy use. Mind, Brain, and Education, 6(3), 129–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-228X.2012.01148.x
41.
VandierendonckA. (2017). A comparison of methods to combine speed and accuracy measures of performance: A rejoinder on the binning procedure. Behavior Research Methods, 49(2), 653–673. https://doi.org/10.3758%2Fs13428-016-0721-5
42.
WechslerD. (2003). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (4th ed.). The Psychological Corporation.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
