Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

To solicit support for nature and wildlife conservation, mission-driven organizations rely on professional nature and wildlife imagery in their media outlets and campaigns. We investigated whether—and if so, why—the aesthetics of images increase social media engagement (e.g., number of likes) and the extent to which images elicit moral concern for nature and wildlife. In Study 1 (N = 782 U.S. adults), we trained a neural network to predict image aesthetics in National Geographic’s Instagram data and identified image-specific attributes that influence aesthetics. We found that image aesthetics predicted engagement with the Instagram posts. In Study 2 (N = 775 U.S. adults), we established the causal effect of aesthetics on engagement and moral concern, which is explained by self-transcendent emotions (awe and inspiration) and purity associated with an image. Study 3 (N = 406 U.S. adults) replicated the results, showing that our key effects were stronger for individuals who place higher importance on beauty. By demonstrating the moral significance of image aesthetics, we highlight the potential of the beauty of nature to invigorate global conservation efforts.

Keywords

nature and wildlife imagery aesthetics awe inspiration purity machine learning deep learning image processing open data preregistered

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bastian

Costello

Loughnan

Hodson

(2012). When closing the human–animal divide expands moral concern: The importance of framing. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(4), 421–429. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611425106

Berger

Milkman

K. L.

(2012). What makes online content viral? Journal of Marketing Research, 49(2), 192–205. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.10.0353

Bloch

P. H.

Brunel

F. F.

Arnold

T. J.

(2003). Individual differences in the centrality of visual product aesthetics: Concept and measurement. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(4), 551–565. https://doi.org/10.1086/346250

Bradley

M. M.

Lang

P. J.

(1994). Measuring emotion: The Self-Assessment Manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 25(1), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7916(94)90063-9

Bradski

Kaehler

(2008). Learning OpenCV: Computer vision with the OpenCV library. O’Reilly.

Crimston

C. R.

Bain

P. G.

Hornsey

M. J.

Bastian

(2016). Moral expansiveness: Examining variability in the extension of the moral world. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(4), 636–653. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000086

Dutton

(2014). A Darwinian theory of beauty. Philosophy and Literature, 38(1), A314–A318.

Faul

Erdfelder

Lang

A.-G.

Buchner

(2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.

Faust

N. T.

Chatterjee

Christopoulos

G. I.

(2019). Beauty in the eyes and the hand of the beholder: Eye and hand movements’ differential responses to facial attractiveness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 85, Article 103884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103884

10.

Feinberg

Willer

(2013). The moral roots of environmental attitudes. Psychological Science, 24(1), 56–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612449177

11.

Goodwin

G. P.

(2015). Experimental approaches to moral standing. Philosophy Compass, 10(12), 914–926. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12266

12.

Hayes

A. F.

(2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.

13.

Holbrook

M. B.

Batra

(1987). Assessing the role of emotions as mediators of consumer responses to advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(3), 404–420. https://doi.org/10.1086/209123

14.

Hou

J.-R.

Zhang

J. J.

Zhang

(2019). Can title images predict the emotions and the performance of crowdfunding projects? In Bui

(Chair), Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 4439–4448). https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2019.538

15.

Jiang

Sedikides

(2021). Awe motivates authentic-self pursuit via self-transcendence: Implications for prosociality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000381

16.

Kellert

S. R.

(1996). The value of life: Biological diversity and human society. Island Press.

17.

Kellert

S. R.

Wilson

E. O.

(1993). The biophilia hypothesis. Island Press.

18.

Keltner

Haidt

(2003). Approaching awe, a moral, spiritual, and aesthetic emotion. Cognition and Emotion, 17(2), 297–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930302297

19.

Kim

H.-R.

Kim

Y.-S.

Kim

S. J.

Lee

I.-K.

(2018). Building emotional machines: Recognizing image emotions through deep neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 20(11), 2980–2992. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMM.2018.2827782

20.

Klebl

Luo

Bastian

(2022). Beyond aesthetic judgment: Beauty increases moral standing through perceptions of purity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 48(6), 954–967. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211023648

21.

Klebl

Luo

Tan

N. P.-J.

Ping Ern

J. T.

Bastian

(2021). Beauty of the beast: Beauty as an important dimension in the moral standing of animals. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 75, Article 101624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101624

22.

Xie

(2020). Is a picture worth a thousand words? An empirical study of image content and social media engagement. Journal of Marketing Research, 57(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022243719881113

23.

Lindell

A. K.

Lindell

K. L.

(2014). Beauty captures the attention of the beholder. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 26(7), 768–780. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2014.963111

24.

Lundy

Schenkel

Akrie

T. N.

Walker

A. M.

(2010). How important is beauty to you? The development of the Desire for Aesthetics Scale. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 28, 73–92. https://doi.org/10.2190/EM.28.1.e

25.

Mosleh

Pennycook

Rand

D. G.

(2020). Self-reported willingness to share political news articles in online surveys correlates with actual sharing on Twitter. PLOS ONE, 15(2), Article e0228882. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228882

26.

Nelson-Coffey

S. K.

Ruberton

P. M.

Chancellor

Cornick

J. E.

Blascovich

Lyubomirsky

(2019). The proximal experience of awe. PLOS ONE, 14(5), Article e0216780. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216780

27.

Piazza

Landy

J. F.

Goodwin

G. P.

(2014). Cruel nature: Harmfulness as an important, overlooked dimension in judgments of moral standing. Cognition, 131(1), 108–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.12.013

28.

Piff

P. K.

Dietze

Feinberg

Stancato

D. M.

Keltner

(2015). Awe, the small self, and prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(6), 883–899. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000018

29.

Rocklage

M. D.

Rucker

D. D.

Nordgren

L. F.

(2018). The Evaluative Lexicon 2.0: The measurement of emotionality, extremity, and valence in language. Behavior Research Methods, 50(4), 1327–1344. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0975-6

30.

Rottman

Kelemen

Young

(2015). Hindering harm and preserving purity: How can moral psychology save the planet? Philosophy Compass, 10(2), 134–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12195

31.

Sherman

L. E.

Hernandez

L. M.

Greenfield

P. M.

Dapretto

(2018). What the brain ‘Likes’: Neural correlates of providing feedback on social media. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 13(7), 699–707. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsy051

32.

Shiota

M. N.

Keltner

Mossman

(2007). The nature of awe: Elicitors, appraisals, and effects on self-concept. Cognition and Emotion, 21(5), 944–963. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930600923668

33.

Shiota

M. N.

Thrash

T. M.

Danvers

A. F.

Dombrowski

J. T.

(2014). Transcending the self: Awe, elevation, and inspiration. In Tugade

M. M.

Shiota

M. N.

Kirby

L. D.

(Eds.), Handbook of positive emotions (pp. 362–377). Guilford Press.

34.

Small

D. A.

Verrochi

N. M.

(2009). The face of need: Facial emotion expression on charity advertisements. Journal of Marketing Research, 46(6), 777–787. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.46.6.777

35.

Tangney

J. P.

Stuewig

Mashek

D. J.

(2007). Moral emotions and moral behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 58(1), 345–372. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070145

36.

Teixeira

Picard

el Kaliouby

(2014). Why, when, and how much to entertain consumers in advertisements? A web-based facial tracking field study. Marketing Science, 33(6), 809–827. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2014.0854

37.

Thrash

T. M.

Elliot

A. J.

(2003). Inspiration as a psychological construct. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 871–889. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.871

38.

Thrash

T. M.

Maruskin

L. A.

Cassidy

S. E.

Fryer

J. W.

Ryan

R. M.

(2010). Mediating between the muse and the masses: Inspiration and the actualization of creative ideas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(3), 469–487. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017907

39.

Wang

Jia

Yin

Cai

(2013). Interpretable aesthetic features for affective image classification. In Lovell

Suter

(Chairs), 2013 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (pp. 3230–3234). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIP.2013.6738665

40.

Whissell

(2009). Using the revised Dictionary of Affect in Language to quantify the emotional undertones of samples of natural language. Psychological Reports, 105(2), 509–521. https://doi.org/10.2466/PR0.105.2.509-521

41.

Wilson

E. O.

(1984). Biophilia (Rev. ed.). Harvard University Press.

42.

Zhang

Lee

Singh

P. V.

Srinivasan

(2021). What makes a good image? Airbnb demand analytics leveraging interpretable image features. Management Science. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.4175

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.14 MB

The Moral Significance of Aesthetics in Nature Imagery

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material